ASIC warns major banks’ fees-for-no-service reviews are incomplete and delayed

Maria Nikolova

Most of the institutions are yet to complete reviews to identify systemic FFNS failures beyond those already identified and reported to ASIC since 2013.

The Australian Securities & Investments Commission (ASIC) has earlier today published an update on review programs undertaken by AMP, ANZ, CBA, Macquarie, NAB and Westpac regarding fees-for-no-service (FFNS) failures.

ASIC warns that that most of the institutions are yet to complete reviews to identify systemic FFNS failures beyond those already identified and reported to ASIC since 2013. The reports are delayed and incomplete, the regulator warns.

ASIC Commissioner Danielle Press commented:

“These reviews have been unreasonably delayed. ASIC acknowledges that they are large scale reviews – they relate to systemic failures over long periods with reviews going back six to 10 years and cover 36 licensees from the six institutions that currently authorise more than 7,000 advisers However, we believe the institutions have failed to sufficiently prioritise and resource their reviews, particularly as ASIC advised them to commence the reviews in mid-2015 or early 2016”.

Some of the main reasons for delays by the institutions include poor record-keeping and systems within the institutions, which mean that in many cases they have been unable to access customer files for review, or failures by some institutions to implement customer-centric methodologies to identify and compensate customers. Also, some institutions have taken a “legalistic approach” to determination of the services they were required to provide.

ASIC’s FFNS supervisory work includes overseeing the institutions’ programs to compensate customers impacted by the reported failures to provide advice services paid for by customers, as well as the institutions’ reviews to determine if there were further systemic FFNS failures on top of those already identified and reported to ASIC.

Under the compensation programs, AMP, ANZ, CBA, NAB and Westpac have collectively paid or offered about $350 million in compensation to customers who were charged financial advice fees for no service at the end of January 2019. Additionally, the institutions have provisioned more than $800 million towards potential compensation for further systemic FFNS failures. However, these reviews are incomplete.

Let’s recall that, since 2014, ASIC has supervised the FFNS compensation programs of 32 Australian financial services (AFS) licensees. As at end-January 2019, the licensees have paid or offered about $316 million in FFNS compensation to more than 120,000 customers who were charged fees for personal advice. Of this, some $235 million has come from licensees owned by the institutions. Separately, NAB’s superannuation trustee, NULIS Nominees (Australia) Ltd, has paid or offered over $116 million in relation to ‘plan service fees’ for general advice.

Along with supervision of the compensation programs and further reviews undertaken by the institutions, ASIC is also carrying out a number of FFNS investigations and plans to take enforcement action against licensees that have engaged in misconduct.

The regulator says it will continue to supervise and report on the institutions’ further reviews into FFNS failures.

Read this next

Fintech

TNS brings full-stack market data management to EMEA

“We are also delighted to have Ben Myers join our London-based TNS Financial Markets team as Head of Strategic Sales for EMEA, to bolster our presence in the region.”

Chainwire

Velocity Labs and Ramp Network facilitate fiat to crypto onramp on Polkadot via Asset Hub support

Velocity Labs is proud to announce a fiat to crypto onramp using Ramp Network through the integration of Asset Hub. Through it, Ramp will be able to service any parachain in the Polkadot ecosystem.

Executive Moves

INFINOX hires Mayne Ayliffe as Global Head of HR

“I look forward to working with our teams around the world to develop a strategic HR agenda that supports high performance and is centred on human motivation.”

Fintech

Sterling to provide risk and margin support for fixed income

“Firms must have the tools to effectively manage their risk across all asset classes. As yields rise, we see more exposure from clients in the fixed income space. We understand their need to measure and mitigate risk in a highly regulated environment.”

Retail FX

FXOpen launches HK share CFDs: Tencent, Alibaba, Xiaomi, Baidu

Hong Kong share CFDs will be commission-free for a limited period of time.

Retail FX

IronFX Celebrates an Award-Winning Start to 2024 with a Series of Industry Recognitions

IronFX, a global leader in online trading, has embarked on 2024 with a spectacular display of accolades that highlight its commitment to excellence and innovation in the competitive financial services sector.

Industry News

FIA urges CFTC to regulate use cases rather than AI itself

“We urge the CFTC to refrain from crafting new regulations that generally regulate AI because this approach presents certain well-known pitfalls. By approaching the issue from the perspective of AI as a technology, rather than the use case for the technology, corresponding regulations would likely necessitate a definition of AI. We anticipate that any attempt to properly define AI would be very challenging and require considerable resources.”

Education, Inside View

The Power of Public Relations in Finance: Shaping Perceptions & Building Reputation

It’s safe to say that the finance industry has faced its share of reputation crises over the years, from the 2008 financial collapse to the many scandals around irresponsible lending, political corruption, and even Ponzi schemes. 

Digital Assets

Crossover’s crypto ECN executed over $3 billion in Q1 2024

“Our growth is also driving continued increases in the percentages of trades that are ‘Order Crossing Order’ (OXO). Currently, roughly 10% of all trades executed on CROSSx are OXO, another differentiator in our platform’s capacity. This capacity and our unique execution model provide value to both the market maker and taker, as evidenced by our commercial model.”

<