Defrauded Chinese investors insist JPMorgan provided substantial assistance to Ponzi scammer

Maria Nikolova

Although JPMorgan had no fiduciary duty to the investors defrauded by Renwick Haddow, the bank is said to have nevertheless provided substantial assistance to the scammer as its nonfeasance amounts to knowing facilitation of a crime.

A case targeting JPMorgan Chase & Co. (NYSE:JPM) and JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. over their alleged aiding and abetting “Bar Works” – a Ponzi scheme operated by Renwick Haddow, continues at the New York Southern District Court. After the defendants sought to rebuff the accusations earlier this month by arguing that they did not provide any substantial assistance to Haddow, the plaintiffs have replied to this attempt for defense.

On Wednesday, March 14, 2018, the counsel for the 245 plaintiffs in the action, captioned ZHAO et al v. JPMorgan Chase & Co., et al (1:17-cv-08570), filed a Letter with the Court.

In the Letter, addressed to the Honorable Naomi Reice Buchwald, the plaintiffs argue again that JPMorgan had actual knowledge of the “Bar Works” fraud. The most solid facts which are seen to support the bank’s actual knowledge involve the notoriety and infamy of the Bar Works scheme’s mastermind, Renwick Haddow. He is also known for other fraudulent schemes, including ones involving Bitcoin. The plaintiffs insist that JPMorgan had been aware of Haddow’s true identity and his fraudulent activities while he presented himself under a fake name in communications with “Bar Works” investors.

The plaintiffs expect that discovery of documents will substantiate their allegations, that a known international fraudster, an individual banned from acting as a company director in his home country, attracted the notice of JPMorgan employees following standard banking practices and the bank’s own KYC/AML policies. Plaintiffs expect to find routine alerts triggered by the defendants’ transaction monitoring system, the contents of the defendants’ KYC file on Renwick Haddow, internal communications among the bank’s employees discussing Haddow’s prior schemes, and other internal documents and communications indicating the bank’s actual knowledge.

The plaintiffs also note the transfers to luxury goods purveyors and foreign accounts outside of the scope of Bar Works’ business, including binary options firms. These, the plaintiffs say, cannot be presumed routine or typical banking transactions, and amounted to substantial assistance.

Substantial assistance occurs when a defendant affirmatively assists, helps conceal or fails to act when required to do so, thus enabling the breach to occur. The general rule is that mere inaction of an alleged aider and abettor constitutes substantial assistance only if the defendant owes a fiduciary duty directly to the plaintiff. JPMorgan has argued that it owes no such duty to the plaintiffs in this case. In their latest Letter, the defrauded investors note New York courts have found substantial assistance, even without a fiduciary duty owed to the plaintiff, when such nonfeasance amounts to knowing facilitation of a crime.

Given the fees that JPMorgan received from Haddow’s bank account transactions, the plaintiffs argue that, at the pleading stage, they have managed to state a sufficient claim under New York law for negligence and unjust enrichment against the bank.

Previously filed documents indicate that the plaintiffs claim combined $16,907,626.00 in damages.

Read this next

Metaverse Gaming NFT

DCentral Miami brings together all of Web3, NFT, DeFi, Metaverse

The world’s biggest Web3 meeting entitled DCENTRAL Miami is set to take place November 28-29, featuring a lineup of some of the biggest and most influential names in the blockchain space.

Digital Assets

Crypto ban expands across UK banks as Starling joins ‎crackdown

UK digital bank Starling has banned ‎all customer payments related to cryptocurrencies, another blow for the crypto traders ‎who recently saw a sizable number of banks deciding not to ‎finance the wobbly asset class.‎


Markets Direct at FIA EXPO 2022: Traders know what they want from brokers

The FIA Expo 2022, one of the most prestigious events within the global derivatives trading industry, took place in Chicago on 14 & 15 November.


FIA Expo 2022: TNS addresses public cloud limitations with hybrid infrastructure

November is the month of the FIA Expo, one of the largest futures and options conferences in the world, bringing together regulators, exchanges, software vendors, and brokers in one place: the Sheraton Grand Chicago Riverwalk. 

Retail FX

Italy’s regulator blacks out Finance CapitalFX, MFCapitalFX

Italy’s Commissione Nazionale per le Società e la Borsa (CONSOB) has shut down new websites in an ongoing clampdown against firms it accuses of illegally promoting investment products in the country.

Retail FX

Suspected leader of Honk Kong ramp-and-dump scam appears in court

A leader of a sophisticated ramp-and-dump scheme made his first court appearance in a Hong Kong court today, charged with market manipulation and various criminal offences. The case stems from an earlier joint operation of Hong Kong’s financial watchdog, the Securities and Futures Commission (SFC), and the local police. 

Institutional FX

Cboe’s James Arrante discusses growing demand for fixed income, FX algo

We caught up with James Arrante, senior director of FX & US treasuries product and business management at Cboe Global Markets, to uncover emerging trends in the FX and fixed income markets and learn more about the bourse operator’s recent initiatives.

Retail FX

Eurotrader acquires UK broker Petra Asset Management

Eurotrader Group has formally entered into the UK market with the acquisition of FCA-regulated broker, previously named Petra Asset Management Ltd. The new entity operates under the brand name Eurotrade Capital Ltd.

Inside View, Retail FX

The Game of Chess Continues – OPEC, China and the Oil Market

Over the past decade, the US has been complaining about the amount of power which the BRIC group, and specifically China, has on the global economy. BRIC stands for Brazil, Russia, India and China; these were the world’s fastest growing economies. Only in the past 10 months, the US has turned their attention toward OPEC due to the prices of fuel. Nevertheless, China seems to have a strong influence even over the price of crude oil.