ESMA to reassess TC-CCPs recognition decisions, including ones about UK-based CCPs

Maria Nikolova

In particular, ESMA will assess whether the classes of OTC derivatives cleared by recognised TC-CCPs should be subject to the clearing obligation as foreseen in EMIR.

MiFID II implementation likely to be set back even further

The European Securities and Markets Authority (ESMA) today published its 2020 Supervision Work Programme, detailing the areas of focus for its supervision this year.

The list of priorities for 2020 includes supervision of Third Country Central Clearing Counterparties (CCPs) & Central Securities Depositories (CSDs).

During 2019, ESMA issued several communications regarding Brexit confirming that ESMA considered that the conditions for recognition under Article 25 of EMIR were met by the three UK-based CCPs in case of a no-deal Brexit. Therefore, it has adopted decisions to recognise them as TC-CCPs under EMIR.

The Brexit deadline was extended several times. Given the nature of the current extension and the high level of uncertainty as to the final timing and conditions of Brexit, ESMA will issue further announcements and adjust and update its contingency measures (i.e. the conditional recognition decisions) for the UK-based CCPs as matters develop.

Further to the necessary steps of reviewing and checking the data received and issuing corresponding follow-up requests, ESMA has finalised its analysis on potential risks recognised TC-CCPs might bring to the EU and has identified areas of monitoring focus for the following years.

In March 2019, the European Parliament, the Council and the European Commission reached a political agreement on the review of the regulatory framework for the authorisation and supervision of CCPs established in Title III of Regulation 648/2012 (EMIR 2.2). EMIR 2.2 entered into force on January 1, 2020.

This review of EMIR introduces a new category of TC-CCPs, the systemically important or likely to become systemically important CCPs (Tier 2 CCPs), which in order to be recognised under Article 25 of EMIR, have to comply, among other things, with the EMIR requirements set out in Article 16 and Titles IV and V of EMIR. Those Tier 2 CCPs will be under ESMA’s ongoing direct supervision whereas Tier 1 CCPs will be subject to the currently applicable regime of recognition and on-going monitoring.

The European Commission will adopt a delegated act in accordance with Article 82 of EMIR to further specify the criteria set out in Article 25(2a) of EMIR. The same applies with regards to a delegated act on comparable compliance minimum elements to be assessed and modalities and conditions to carry out the assessment as well as one for fees associated to application and annual fees for recognised TC-CCPs.

Once the delegated acts on tiering and comparable compliance will be in force, ESMA will be able to exercise its powers fully and execute the new recognition process for the new TC-CCP applicants and also for the TC-CCPs which are already recognised and for which ESMA has 18 months to review the recognition decision.

In this context, ESMA says that, in 2020, it will focus on re-assessing the current TC-CCPs recognition decisions, including the UK-based CCPs ones as appropriate, and then perform the corresponding supervisory and monitoring actions depending on the tier where each TC-CCP stands.

In particular, ESMA will assess whether the classes of OTC derivatives cleared by recognised TC-CCPs should be subject to the clearing obligation as foreseen in EMIR.

ESMA will also have to establish and manage a college to facilitate the sharing of information on TC-CCPs, within four months of the entry into force of the tiering delegated act.

Read this next

Financewire

Kinesis Mint becomes the official partner for the House of Mandela

Kinesis Mint, the certified independent precious metals mint and refinery of Kinesis, the monetary system backed by 1:1 allocated gold and silver, has been appointed the exclusive coin producer for the House of Mandela.

Chainwire

Kadena Announces Annelise Osborne as Chief Business Officer

Kadena, the only scalable Layer-1 Proof-of-Work blockchain, expands its leadership team by onboarding Annelise Osborne as Kadena’s new Chief Business Officer (CBO).

Fintech

TNS brings full-stack market data management to EMEA

“We are also delighted to have Ben Myers join our London-based TNS Financial Markets team as Head of Strategic Sales for EMEA, to bolster our presence in the region.”

Chainwire

Velocity Labs and Ramp Network facilitate fiat to crypto onramp on Polkadot via Asset Hub support

Velocity Labs is proud to announce a fiat to crypto onramp using Ramp Network through the integration of Asset Hub. Through it, Ramp will be able to service any parachain in the Polkadot ecosystem.

Executive Moves

INFINOX hires Mayne Ayliffe as Global Head of HR

“I look forward to working with our teams around the world to develop a strategic HR agenda that supports high performance and is centred on human motivation.”

Fintech

Sterling to provide risk and margin support for fixed income

“Firms must have the tools to effectively manage their risk across all asset classes. As yields rise, we see more exposure from clients in the fixed income space. We understand their need to measure and mitigate risk in a highly regulated environment.”

Retail FX

FXOpen launches HK share CFDs: Tencent, Alibaba, Xiaomi, Baidu

Hong Kong share CFDs will be commission-free for a limited period of time.

Retail FX

IronFX Celebrates an Award-Winning Start to 2024 with a Series of Industry Recognitions

IronFX, a global leader in online trading, has embarked on 2024 with a spectacular display of accolades that highlight its commitment to excellence and innovation in the competitive financial services sector.

Industry News

FIA urges CFTC to regulate use cases rather than AI itself

“We urge the CFTC to refrain from crafting new regulations that generally regulate AI because this approach presents certain well-known pitfalls. By approaching the issue from the perspective of AI as a technology, rather than the use case for the technology, corresponding regulations would likely necessitate a definition of AI. We anticipate that any attempt to properly define AI would be very challenging and require considerable resources.”

<