Ex-customer of Interactive Brokers insists he is entitled to comprehensive review of source code

Maria Nikolova

According to Robert Scott Batchelar, a protective order proposed by Interactive Brokers hampers his ability to hire experts willing to review and offer opinions regarding the source code.

FinanceFeeds has been monitoring a lawsuit targeting online trading major Interactive Brokers Group, Inc. (IEX:IBKR), with the plaintiff – a former client of Interactive, claiming he and a purported class of customers of Interactive Brokers LLC were harmed by alleged “flaws” in the computerized system used by the brokerage to close out (i.e., liquidate) positions in customer brokerage accounts that have margin deficiencies.

Over the last several months, the dispute has focused on access of the plaintiff to the defendants’ source code and related materials.

The plaintiff – Robert Scott Batchelar, has stated that he seeks access to the defendants’ Source Code so that his counsel and outside experts may have independent access to such materials for the purposes of this litigation. He is seeking discovery related to Interactive Brokers’ “Auto-Liquidation Software source code” and related explanations of its workings and explanations of related computer database inputs and outputs. The parties have made multiple good-faith efforts to eliminate the need for Court intervention but have failed to arrive at a mutually satisfactory resolution.

The brokerage, however, requested that the Court enter a supplemental protective order. According to the defendants, allowing the plaintiff to use the information his counsel and experts may learn from reviewing Interactive Brokers’ Source Code in other unrelated proceedings would defeat much of the purpose of entering into a supplemental protective order. The Source Code, Interactive Brokers argues, is highly proprietary and any public disclosure of it would severely impact the brokerage’s closely guarded trade secrets.

On July 2, 2019, Batchelar filed his Response to Defendants’ Motion for Entry of Supplemental Protective Order with the Connecticut District Court. In the document, seen by FinanceFeeds, the plaintiff argues against Interactive Brokers’ motion for a supplemental protective order,

According to the plaintiff, in an effort to hamper the necessary review of the Source Code, the brokerage has included language in its proposed Supplemental Protective Order that is not necessary to protect its confidential information, but, instead, is designed to hamper the plaintiff’s ability to hire experts willing to review and offer opinions regarding the Source Code. This, according to Batchelar, threatens to destroy the expert’s and the plaintiff’s counsel’s ability to work in future litigation involving the Source Code and against the defendants.

Further, according to Batchelar, the defendants have also proposed a disclosure and objection procedure that is unnecessarily time consuming and onerous, particularly in light of the very short, thirty-day, window in which the plaintiff’s experts must complete their review of the Source Code and prepare written opinions.

In particular, according to the plaintiff, Interactive’s proposal seeks to impermissibly:

  • (1) preclude Plaintiff’s ability to hire Source Code qualifiable experts;
  • (2) prejudge whether an expert could ever be Source Code qualified;
  • (3) prospectively prohibit—in all circumstances—Plaintiff’s counsel and Plaintiff’s Source Code qualified expert’s from future practice in litigation involving the Source Code against Defendants;
  • (4) prejudge, based on unknown future facts, whether Plaintiff’s non-Source Code qualified experts could ever rely upon the opinions or observations of Source Code qualified experts;
  • (5) prevent Plaintiff’s counsel from using their legal assistants and staff to assist with Defendants’ Source Code; and
  • (6) prejudge, again based on unknown future facts, whether documents and court proceedings should be closed to the public.

The plaintiff proposes that his version of a protective order is entered by the Court.

Read this next

Digital Assets

Binance executives sue Nigerian authorities over rights violation

Two senior executives from Binance have filed a lawsuit against against Nigeria’s national security adviser’s office and its anti-corruption agency, alleging violations of their fundamental rights.

Retail FX

Banxso announces 8.7% interest rate on deposits in South Africa

“With Banxso, they can enjoy the benefits of both worlds – earning competitive interest and having the freedom to trade, all within the same platform.”

Industry News

FINRA to publish transaction details in U.S. Treasury securities

“Consistent with our longstanding practice, FINRA is introducing greater transparency in a calibrated and careful manner, benefiting liquidity and resilience in this critical market while also mitigating potential information leakage concerns.”

Institutional FX

OpenYield launches “cheap and easy” fixed income trading for brokers

“We’re on a mission to make bonds cheap and easy to trade, and are excited about the opportunity to build generational capital markets infrastructure.”

Digital Assets

Sumsub and Mercuryo publish a guide for VASPs: “Mastering Travel Rule Compliance”

“At Sumsub, we’ve concentrated our efforts on filling the gap in understanding the complexity of Travel Rule regulation and helping organizations find the best solution to stay safe and compliant while minimizing costs and avoiding potential risks of non-compliance. This guide we created with Mercuryo, our trusted partner, is the ultimate navigation tool all VASPs can consult.”

Digital Assets

Bitget Wallet Leads with Record Swap Volume & New Crypto Innovations

This week, Bitget Wallet achieved a milestone by surpassing Metamask with a record 388,757 Swap order transactions, securing the global lead. The significant 7-day trading volume, almost 68,000 more than its rival, underscores its liquidity and user trust. This robust activity signals Bitget Wallet’s prominent role and reliability in the dynamic crypto market.

Digital Assets

Embarking on a Digital Currency Journey

Imagine you’ve stumbled upon a treasure map, leading you to untold riches hidden in the vastness of the internet. Instead of gold coins and jewel-encrusted goblets, this treasure comes in the form of digital currencies, the modern-day loot coveted by many.

Reviews

Traders Union Experts Share The Trading Analyst Review For 2024

Navigating options trading in rapidly shifting markets poses a considerable challenge. This is where options trading alert services become invaluable. They aid traders in keeping abreast of evolving opportunities and market trends. In this assessment, Traders Union experts scrutinize The Trading Analyst alert service to ascertain its efficacy. 

Digital Assets

BlockDAG’s Presale Achieves $9.9M: Aiming For A 5000-Fold ROI As Cardano’s Price Rises And Fantom Launches Sonic

Explore Cardano’s surge, Sonic’s efficiency, and why BlockDAG’s growth makes it the top crypto choice. A deep dive into the future of blockchain investments.

<