Ex-Deutsche Bank traders accused of spoofing oppose admission of co-conspirator statements at trial

Maria Nikolova

The proffered evidence fails to demonstrate that the alleged conspiracy existed or that the alleged co-conspirators were parties to any agreement to commit fraud, according to James Vorley and Cedric Chanu.

Former Deutsche Bank precious metals traders James Vorley and Cedric Chanu, who stand accused of spoofing, have replied to a motion by the United States Government regarding admission of co- conspirator statements at trial.

The motion was submitted by the US Government in March 2020. The government’s proffer strives to include a comprehensive list of the co-conspirator statements that it plans to introduce as part of its case-in-chief, as well as some statements necessary to put the conspiratorial declarations in context.

There are two categories of statements that the government plans to introduce: (1) statements in electronic communications between and among the defendants and their co-conspirators; and (2) verbal communications among the defendants and their co-conspirators introduced through a cooperating witness, David Liew, who was a member of the charged conspiracy.

On July 31, 2020, James Vorley and Cedric Chanu submitted their opposition to the Government’s Motion for Preliminary Admission of Co-Conspirator Statements.

According to the defendants, the proffer falls short of demonstrating the existence of a criminal conspiracy. They insist that the Government ignores a key disputed issue in this case: whether the charged conduct involved an implied fraudulent misrepresentation.

In order to show the defendants and their alleged co-conspirators were engaged in a conspiracy to defraud other market participants, the government must present evidence that those orders conveyed a material misrepresentation to other market participants about their intent.

The proffered evidence, the defendants say, fails to demonstrate that the alleged conspiracy existed or that the alleged co-conspirators were parties to any agreement to commit fraud. The government repeatedly asserts that the various traders on the precious metals desk engaged in “deceptive trading,” as if this demonstrates that they had an agreement to or knew that they were engaging in fraud. But evidence that employees on Deutsche Bank’s precious metals desk discussed or engaged in “deceptive trading” does not remotely establish that they conspired to misrepresent anything to other traders, Vorley and Chanu say.

“The false equivalence of “deceptive trading” with fraud ignores the fact that trading is a competitive enterprise in which traders must actively conceal their strategies in order to be successful”, the defendants argue.

Vorley and Chanu explain that an “iceberg order,” which reveals only part of the amount a trader intends to buy or sell, is deceptive in that it hides, and thereby expressly misrepresents, true available supply or demand. Likewise, traders may “shred” large orders into a series of smaller orders to be executed over time in order to disguise the true size of the order. Yet such “deceptive trading” is widely accepted as perfectly lawful, the defendants say.

Vorley and Chanu insist that even the government’s cooperating witness, David Liew, who has pleaded guilty, will testify that entering visible orders opposite iceberg orders—the trading he now describes as “spoofing”—was described to him as a legitimate technique to gather market information or to clear risk, and he did not believe at the time that he was involved in market manipulation, fraud, or any other criminal activity.

Further, the defendants argue that the various statements the government seeks to admit into evidence appear to have been selected based on search terms such as “spoof” and “manipulate.” They are presented without context (or even time stamps), and they are replete with unexplained, imperceptible jargon and ambiguity, Vorley and Chanu say.

“With respect to the majority of the statements, the government has not even bothered to state what they are supposed to mean, much less how they advanced the objectives of the alleged conspiracy”, the defendants add.

The government’s motion to admit the proffered statements preliminarily under Rule 801(d)(2)(E) should therefore be denied, Vorley and Chanu say.

The lawsuit continues at the Illinois Northern District Court.

Read this next

Retail FX

Banxso announces 8.7% interest rate on deposits in South Africa

“With Banxso, they can enjoy the benefits of both worlds – earning competitive interest and having the freedom to trade, all within the same platform.”

Industry News

FINRA to publish transaction details in U.S. Treasury securities

“Consistent with our longstanding practice, FINRA is introducing greater transparency in a calibrated and careful manner, benefiting liquidity and resilience in this critical market while also mitigating potential information leakage concerns.”

Institutional FX

OpenYield launches “cheap and easy” fixed income trading for brokers

“We’re on a mission to make bonds cheap and easy to trade, and are excited about the opportunity to build generational capital markets infrastructure.”

Digital Assets

Sumsub and Mercuryo publish a guide for VASPs: “Mastering Travel Rule Compliance”

“At Sumsub, we’ve concentrated our efforts on filling the gap in understanding the complexity of Travel Rule regulation and helping organizations find the best solution to stay safe and compliant while minimizing costs and avoiding potential risks of non-compliance. This guide we created with Mercuryo, our trusted partner, is the ultimate navigation tool all VASPs can consult.”

Digital Assets

Bitget Wallet Leads with Record Swap Volume & New Crypto Innovations

This week, Bitget Wallet achieved a milestone by surpassing Metamask with a record 388,757 Swap order transactions, securing the global lead. The significant 7-day trading volume, almost 68,000 more than its rival, underscores its liquidity and user trust. This robust activity signals Bitget Wallet’s prominent role and reliability in the dynamic crypto market.

Digital Assets

Embarking on a Digital Currency Journey

Imagine you’ve stumbled upon a treasure map, leading you to untold riches hidden in the vastness of the internet. Instead of gold coins and jewel-encrusted goblets, this treasure comes in the form of digital currencies, the modern-day loot coveted by many.

Reviews

Traders Union Experts Share The Trading Analyst Review For 2024

Navigating options trading in rapidly shifting markets poses a considerable challenge. This is where options trading alert services become invaluable. They aid traders in keeping abreast of evolving opportunities and market trends. In this assessment, Traders Union experts scrutinize The Trading Analyst alert service to ascertain its efficacy. 

Digital Assets

BlockDAG’s Presale Achieves $9.9M: Aiming For A 5000-Fold ROI As Cardano’s Price Rises And Fantom Launches Sonic

Explore Cardano’s surge, Sonic’s efficiency, and why BlockDAG’s growth makes it the top crypto choice. A deep dive into the future of blockchain investments.

Digital Assets

US, UK probe $20 billion Tether transfers tied to Russian exchange.

U.S. and UK authorities are investigating the movement of $20 billion in the USD-pegged stablecoin tether (USDT) through Moscow-based exchange Garantex.

<