FSCS concludes investigations into practices of Pentagon Capital Management

Maria Nikolova

The compensation scheme has determined that protected claims may exist against Pentagon, depending on when investments were made.

The UK Financial Services Compensation Scheme (FSCS) has published an update into the matter concerning failed fund manager Pentagon Capital Management plc.

FSCS says it has now concluded its investigations into the practices of Pentagon. The investigations have focussed on correspondence sent by Pentagon to investors in 2003 and 2004 offering assurances to them that Pentagon were not engaged in any unlawful trading practices. FSCS has determined that protected claims may exist against Pentagon, depending on when investments were made.

Claims already submitted against Pentagon will shortly be passed to FSCS’s claims processing teams for assessment.

Pentagon, which was active in the UK and the US, entered administration in June 2012. Pentagon was based in the United Kingdom and operated as an independent financial advisor (IFA) and fund manager for several regulated and unregulated investment funds.

The entity provided financial advice to its clients and, as a result of this advice, investors purchased an investment bond, arranged by Pentagon. The investment bond would provide benefits linked to certain unit-linked funds managed by Pentagon themselves.

In the fall of 2003, the United States Securities & Exchange Commission (SEC) started investigating allegations of late trading against several firms in the United States.

The Financial Services Authority (FSA), the predecessor of the FCA, also initiated an investigation into late trading in UK-authorised Collective Investment Schemes (CIS). In March 2004, the FSA concluded that there was no evidence of late trading in UK-authorised CIS. Following this announcement Pentagon sent letters to its investors reassuring them of the soundness of Pentagon’s investment strategy and drawing investors’ attention to the conclusions reached by FSA.

In 2008, Pentagon learned that the SEC were to take legal action against them and commenced winding down its various funds. On February 2, 2012 the SEC’s claim that Pentagon were engaged in late trading between 1999 and 2003 was upheld. Pentagon was ordered to pay a fine of $76.8 million. The entity then entered administration on June 28, 2012.

Read this next

Fintech

TNS brings full-stack market data management to EMEA

“We are also delighted to have Ben Myers join our London-based TNS Financial Markets team as Head of Strategic Sales for EMEA, to bolster our presence in the region.”

Chainwire

Velocity Labs and Ramp Network facilitate fiat to crypto onramp on Polkadot via Asset Hub support

Velocity Labs is proud to announce a fiat to crypto onramp using Ramp Network through the integration of Asset Hub. Through it, Ramp will be able to service any parachain in the Polkadot ecosystem.

Executive Moves

INFINOX hires Mayne Ayliffe as Global Head of HR

“I look forward to working with our teams around the world to develop a strategic HR agenda that supports high performance and is centred on human motivation.”

Fintech

Sterling to provide risk and margin support for fixed income

“Firms must have the tools to effectively manage their risk across all asset classes. As yields rise, we see more exposure from clients in the fixed income space. We understand their need to measure and mitigate risk in a highly regulated environment.”

Retail FX

FXOpen launches HK share CFDs: Tencent, Alibaba, Xiaomi, Baidu

Hong Kong share CFDs will be commission-free for a limited period of time.

Retail FX

IronFX Celebrates an Award-Winning Start to 2024 with a Series of Industry Recognitions

IronFX, a global leader in online trading, has embarked on 2024 with a spectacular display of accolades that highlight its commitment to excellence and innovation in the competitive financial services sector.

Industry News

FIA urges CFTC to regulate use cases rather than AI itself

“We urge the CFTC to refrain from crafting new regulations that generally regulate AI because this approach presents certain well-known pitfalls. By approaching the issue from the perspective of AI as a technology, rather than the use case for the technology, corresponding regulations would likely necessitate a definition of AI. We anticipate that any attempt to properly define AI would be very challenging and require considerable resources.”

Education, Inside View

The Power of Public Relations in Finance: Shaping Perceptions & Building Reputation

It’s safe to say that the finance industry has faced its share of reputation crises over the years, from the 2008 financial collapse to the many scandals around irresponsible lending, political corruption, and even Ponzi schemes. 

Digital Assets

Crossover’s crypto ECN executed over $3 billion in Q1 2024

“Our growth is also driving continued increases in the percentages of trades that are ‘Order Crossing Order’ (OXO). Currently, roughly 10% of all trades executed on CROSSx are OXO, another differentiator in our platform’s capacity. This capacity and our unique execution model provide value to both the market maker and taker, as evidenced by our commercial model.”

<