Gallant Capital Markets bankruptcy trustee accuses AFX of strategic games to delay proceedings

Maria Nikolova

The recent havoc involving AFX’s legal counsel is said to be another tactic to delay the proceedings and avoid turning over $1.4 million to Gallant.

The recent motion by Douglas E Spelfogel, a member of the law firm of Foley & Lardner LLP, counsel for defendants AFX Capital Markets Ltd., AFX Capital U.S. Corp. and STO Super Trading Online, in a lawsuit which is related to the bankruptcy of Gallant Capital Markets, has attracted the opposition of the counsel for the bankruptcy trustee.

Let’s recall that, Douglas E Spelfogel has asked to withdraw as counsel for AFX, because “the AFX Parties have not paid for significant legal services rendered to them and Foley has received no response to numerous requests over the last two months with respect to the same and with respect to matters arising in the Adversary Proceeding generally”.

In addition, Spelfogel has requested that that “all proceedings in this Adversary Proceeding be stayed pending the hearing of this Application and for a period of thirty (30) days thereafter in order to permit the AFX Parties to obtain new counsel”. It is this point that has sparked the concerns of the counsel for the bankruptcy trustee.

On Wednesday, October 31, 2018, Joseph S. Maniscalco, a member of the law firm of LaMonica Herbst & Maniscalco, LLP (LHM), counsel for Esther DuVal, in her capacity as the Chapter 11 Trustee of the Gallant Capital Markets, Ltd. Bankruptcy estate, filed an affirmation in opposition to Spelfogel’s request with the New York Eastern Bankruptcy Court.

In this document, Maniscalco insists that there can be no doubt that AFX is engaging in a systematic delay of the proceeding so that it can continue to obtain the benefit of money improperly taken from Gallant’s account. The trustee’s counsel alleges that AFX is playing games with different counsels, including White and Williams, LLP (WW), who are said to have been retained to represent the AFX Parties in this proceeding.

“It appears that the AFX Parties are seemingly playing games with their different counsels, the Trustee and this Court. This systematic patterned delay by the AFX Parties appears to be intentional”, the counsel for the trustee argues.

The only rational explanation, according to Maniscalco, is that AFX is stalling so as to avoid the turnover of $1.4 million that it improperly took from Gallant Capital Markets’ account.

“In fact, the AFX Parties were merely delaying at the time when the Debtors demanded their funds to be wired”, the counsel for the trustee explains.

First, AFX claimed it did not recognize the wire instructions. Then, AFX did not recognize the beneficiary of the wire transfer. And finally, after weeks of delay and cash flow liquidity issues, Gallant Capital Markets filed for bankruptcy and AFX then used that as a reason for not turning over the funds.

Now AFX is said to be continuing to delay even though the Filing Date (of the bankruptcy case) was 20 months ago. By changing counsel because of the purported lack of communication and failure to pay basis, AFX is said to be forecasting its strategy, and if allowed, may do the same thing with WW. This behavior by the AFX Parties should not be rewarded without an appropriate inquiry under the abusive circumstances of this case, the counsel for the bankruptcy trustee argues.

Accordingly, the Trustee respectfully requests that the Court (i) deny the Application to Withdraw until the relevant facts are fully disclosed by Foley and AFX, and (ii) require that AFX have a representative at any final hearing on the Motion to Withdraw to (a) explain AFX’s refusal to date to participate in or even discuss mediation despite its counsel’s representations to the Court, and (b) confirm that AFX’s action in this case going forward will be good faith participation in the process as opposed to more delay tactics and cat and mouse game strategy that costs the Debtors’ estates and their creditors.

Under the Complaint against AFX, throughout 2015 and 2016, Gallant deposited approximately $2.35 million (for its benefit) into a Gallant account maintained at AFX. Within the two-week period prior to Gallant’s commencement of its bankruptcy case, there was a balance of approximately $2.4 million in the Gallant account at AFX. Around that time, Gallant made multiple demands upon Defendants for the turnover of Gallant’s funds—all of which were disregarded.

Nevertheless, AFX withdrew the remaining balance, without authorization and without basis, on the Filing Date—in violation of the automatic stay. This case involves core issues whereby the Trustee is seeking a turnover of Gallant property and recovery of assets of the Gallant estate, and enforcement of the automatic stay.

The case is captioned Duval v. AFX Capital Markets Ltd. et al (1:18-ap-01038).

Read this next

Metaverse Gaming NFT

DCentral Miami brings together all of Web3, NFT, DeFi, Metaverse

The world’s biggest Web3 meeting entitled DCENTRAL Miami is set to take place November 28-29, featuring a lineup of some of the biggest and most influential names in the blockchain space.

Digital Assets

Crypto ban expands across UK banks as Starling joins ‎crackdown

UK digital bank Starling has banned ‎all customer payments related to cryptocurrencies, another blow for the crypto traders ‎who recently saw a sizable number of banks deciding not to ‎finance the wobbly asset class.‎


Markets Direct at FIA EXPO 2022: Traders know what they want from brokers

The FIA Expo 2022, one of the most prestigious events within the global derivatives trading industry, took place in Chicago on 14 & 15 November.


FIA Expo 2022: TNS addresses public cloud limitations with hybrid infrastructure

November is the month of the FIA Expo, one of the largest futures and options conferences in the world, bringing together regulators, exchanges, software vendors, and brokers in one place: the Sheraton Grand Chicago Riverwalk. 

Retail FX

Italy’s regulator blacks out Finance CapitalFX, MFCapitalFX

Italy’s Commissione Nazionale per le Società e la Borsa (CONSOB) has shut down new websites in an ongoing clampdown against firms it accuses of illegally promoting investment products in the country.

Retail FX

Suspected leader of Honk Kong ramp-and-dump scam appears in court

A leader of a sophisticated ramp-and-dump scheme made his first court appearance in a Hong Kong court today, charged with market manipulation and various criminal offences. The case stems from an earlier joint operation of Hong Kong’s financial watchdog, the Securities and Futures Commission (SFC), and the local police. 

Institutional FX

Cboe’s James Arrante discusses growing demand for fixed income, FX algo

We caught up with James Arrante, senior director of FX & US treasuries product and business management at Cboe Global Markets, to uncover emerging trends in the FX and fixed income markets and learn more about the bourse operator’s recent initiatives.

Retail FX

Eurotrader acquires UK broker Petra Asset Management

Eurotrader Group has formally entered into the UK market with the acquisition of FCA-regulated broker, previously named Petra Asset Management Ltd. The new entity operates under the brand name Eurotrade Capital Ltd.

Inside View, Retail FX

The Game of Chess Continues – OPEC, China and the Oil Market

Over the past decade, the US has been complaining about the amount of power which the BRIC group, and specifically China, has on the global economy. BRIC stands for Brazil, Russia, India and China; these were the world’s fastest growing economies. Only in the past 10 months, the US has turned their attention toward OPEC due to the prices of fuel. Nevertheless, China seems to have a strong influence even over the price of crude oil.