Is the P&L model dead and buried? Not by a VERY long way

The rapid shift away from remunerating sales staff, partners, affiliates and introducers on net deposit a couple of years ago took effect in order that the retail FX industry could emulate the institutional sector and provide retail clients with an ethical trading system, whilst providing a more steady stream of income for the broker, and […]

The rapid shift away from remunerating sales staff, partners, affiliates and introducers on net deposit a couple of years ago took effect in order that the retail FX industry could emulate the institutional sector and provide retail clients with an ethical trading system, whilst providing a more steady stream of income for the broker, and encouraging longer term relationships for all parties.

So much emphasis has been placed on this, that it has become widely understood across the entire industry that the ‘profit and loss’ model is a think of the past.

This is very much not the case at all, and in order to investigate, FinanceFeeds conducted extensive research in Shanghai, China, the center of attention for all industry participants worldwide.

Whilst most affiliates and introducers in the region are insistent on ensuring that their clients remain with them long term, and contrary to popular belief, are very cautious when entering into a deal with a broker to ensure that their clients will be catered for with their best interests in mind, this giant, fabulous and advanced financial powerhouse is home to some very large companies which operate their business purely on net client loss.

Whilst it most certainly could be argued that a profit and loss deal between broker and introducing agent is potentially against client interest, it is also most certainly worthy of consideration that it is not in the best interest of a broker from not only a risk management point of view but also a cash flow perspective.

If an introducing agent is remunerated on spread mark up, or commission as a revenue share, this ensures a steady income stream for the introducing agent, however, if remuneration is conducted on a profit and loss model, and there is a month in which many clients make a profit, then no commission would be due at all, and the introducing agent would be saddled with operating costs and staff salaries, but have no income.

Let’s put some figures on it. FinanceFeeds research has concluded that in Shanghai alone, there are approximately 10 introducers which would like to operate on a profit and loss model, however western brokerages which have a large share of the Chinese IB market do not operate with this method therefore they (and their customers) are targets for those which do.

Three companies in downtown Shanghai which prefer the profit and loss model have a net deposit amount of around $30 million per year, with clients purely trading using EAs.

IB commission is roughly $20 million per annum per firm, and there are approximately $100 million in assets under management within each company. The business model takes into consideration that clients will lose a combined total of approximately $70 million per year, hence the net deposit figure.

Remarkable indeed, and perhaps not as unsustainable as was once thought as word travels very quickly in China if things go awry for customers.

 

 

Read this next

Retail FX

Banxso announces 8.7% interest rate on deposits in South Africa

“With Banxso, they can enjoy the benefits of both worlds – earning competitive interest and having the freedom to trade, all within the same platform.”

Industry News

FINRA to publish transaction details in U.S. Treasury securities

“Consistent with our longstanding practice, FINRA is introducing greater transparency in a calibrated and careful manner, benefiting liquidity and resilience in this critical market while also mitigating potential information leakage concerns.”

Institutional FX

OpenYield launches “cheap and easy” fixed income trading for brokers

“We’re on a mission to make bonds cheap and easy to trade, and are excited about the opportunity to build generational capital markets infrastructure.”

Digital Assets

Sumsub and Mercuryo publish a guide for VASPs: “Mastering Travel Rule Compliance”

“At Sumsub, we’ve concentrated our efforts on filling the gap in understanding the complexity of Travel Rule regulation and helping organizations find the best solution to stay safe and compliant while minimizing costs and avoiding potential risks of non-compliance. This guide we created with Mercuryo, our trusted partner, is the ultimate navigation tool all VASPs can consult.”

Digital Assets

Bitget Wallet Leads with Record Swap Volume & New Crypto Innovations

This week, Bitget Wallet achieved a milestone by surpassing Metamask with a record 388,757 Swap order transactions, securing the global lead. The significant 7-day trading volume, almost 68,000 more than its rival, underscores its liquidity and user trust. This robust activity signals Bitget Wallet’s prominent role and reliability in the dynamic crypto market.

Digital Assets

Embarking on a Digital Currency Journey

Imagine you’ve stumbled upon a treasure map, leading you to untold riches hidden in the vastness of the internet. Instead of gold coins and jewel-encrusted goblets, this treasure comes in the form of digital currencies, the modern-day loot coveted by many.

Reviews

Traders Union Experts Share The Trading Analyst Review For 2024

Navigating options trading in rapidly shifting markets poses a considerable challenge. This is where options trading alert services become invaluable. They aid traders in keeping abreast of evolving opportunities and market trends. In this assessment, Traders Union experts scrutinize The Trading Analyst alert service to ascertain its efficacy. 

Digital Assets

BlockDAG’s Presale Achieves $9.9M: Aiming For A 5000-Fold ROI As Cardano’s Price Rises And Fantom Launches Sonic

Explore Cardano’s surge, Sonic’s efficiency, and why BlockDAG’s growth makes it the top crypto choice. A deep dive into the future of blockchain investments.

Digital Assets

US, UK probe $20 billion Tether transfers tied to Russian exchange.

U.S. and UK authorities are investigating the movement of $20 billion in the USD-pegged stablecoin tether (USDT) through Moscow-based exchange Garantex.

<