JPMorgan secures dismissal of lawsuit brought by victims of Ponzi scammer Renwick Haddow

Maria Nikolova

Victims of Haddow fail to substantiate their claims that JPMorgan aided the scammer.

JPMorgan Chase

JPMorgan Chase & Co. (NYSE:JPM) and JPMorgan Chase Bank have managed to secure dismissal of a case launched against them by hundreds of victims of Ponzi scammer Renwick Haddow. The banks have been accused of helping Haddow.

Earlier today, Judge Naomi Reice Buchwald of the New York Southern District Court signed an order granting the defendant banks’ motion to dismiss.

Let’s recall that the plaintiffs – Hongying Zhao and 244 other individuals, have brought this action against JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. (JPMC) and its holding company JP Morgan Chase & Co.  The First Amended Complaint asserts the following claims against both defendants: (1) knowing participation in a breach of trust, (2) aiding and abetting embezzlement, (3) aiding and abetting breach of fiduciary duty, (4) aiding and abetting conversion, (5) aiding and abetting fraud, (6) unjust enrichment, (7) commercial bad faith, and (8) gross negligence.

The defendants have filed a motion to dismiss the FAC pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 9(b) and 12(b)(6).

The Complaint’s primary allegation is that defendants were willfully blind to the fact that non-party Renwick Haddow and his company “Bar Works” were perpetrating a fraud on their investors. On or about February 4, 2016, Haddow opened depository bank accounts for two Bar Works entities at JPMC (the “622 account” or the “379 account”). The plaintiffs mention several examples of account activity that they allege alerted or should have alerted JPMC to the fraudulent nature of the Bar Works enterprise. According to the Complaint, transaction activity from Haddow’s accounts at JPMC generated tens of thousands of dollars in transaction fees for the bank. The plaintiffs further allege that fees associated with the transactions constituted a “large percentage of the wired amount.” As a result of JPMC’s actions, plaintiffs allege that they lost nearly $17 million in capital that they had invested in Bar Works.

In her ruling, the Judge first turned to plaintiffs’ knowing participation in a breach of trust (Count I) and aiding and abetting breach of fiduciary duty (Count III) claims. Central to Counts I and III is the existence and breach of a fiduciary relationship, the Judge said. However, neither the Complaint nor the brief in opposition to defendants’ motion to dismiss clearly articulate plaintiffs’ theory under which a fiduciary relationship existed between plaintiffs and either Haddow or the Bar Works entities.

Even assuming that there was a fiduciary relationship between investors and Haddow, these claims fail for the additional reasons that plaintiffs do not adequately plead that defendants had actual knowledge of that relationship, the Court says. A necessary predicate of actual knowledge of a breach of fiduciary duty is knowledge of a fiduciary relationship itself. Plaintiffs allege that defendants knew that Haddow and/or Bar Works “were using the 622 Account and the 379 Account as fiduciary accounts,” and that Bar Works had failed to “invest customer property pursuant to [the PPM], which defendants had seen”.

The Judge noted that merely stating that JPMorgan knew Haddow was using the bank’s accounts as fiduciary accounts is plainly conclusory (and elides the fact that the JPMC accounts were ordinary depository accounts rather than specially designated fiduciary or trust accounts). Also, the mere fact that JPMorgan had access to the private placement memorandum (PPM) is irrelevant without sufficiently particular factual allegations that the PPM contained specific indications that the relationship between Haddow and/or Bar Works and investors rose to the level of fiduciary.

The Judge also said that the plaintiffs fail to adequately allege that JPMorgan had actual knowledge of any breach of obligations running from Haddow or Bar Works to plaintiffs. The plaintiffs’ argument that JPMorgan’s knowledge of frequent withdrawals, wire transfers to accounts in countries recognized as money laundering havens, and the single transfer recall request constitute “actual knowledge” of a breach of fiduciary duty or fraudulent scheme was also found to be unpersuasive.

Read this next

Retail FX

Weekly Roundup: eToro links up with Elon Musk, US crackdown on Russian FX

Let’s take a look back at top stories that dominated the financial markets in our Weekly Round coverage. This week’s digest takes a deep dive into the most recent events and trends within the Forex, Fintech, and cryptocurrency.

blockdag

Must-Watch Top 5 Crypto Picks for Q2 2024 Featuring BlockDAG, Toncoin, Solana and More

Dive into BlockDAG’s meteoric rise and explore other promising altcoins like Pepe, Toncoin, Solana, and Render for superior returns.

Retail FX

Clone of Admiral Markets draws FCA attention

The United Kingdom’s financial markets watchdog today unmasked another fraudulent entity, this time bringing to light a clone firm that has been posing as FCA-‎authorised brand, Admiral Markets UK Ltd.

Digital Assets

Gemini Earn users to recover $2.18 billion in crypto payouts

Cryptocurrency exchange Gemini has agreed to pay $50 million worth of digital assets to investors in its Gemini Earn program as part of a settlement with the New York Attorney General (NYAG), announced on Friday.

Fundamental Analysis, Market News, Tech and Fundamental

Global FX Market Summary: British Pound (GBP) Weakness, US Inflation, Euro, USD June 14 ,2024

British Pound weakens due to lower inflation expectations, potential policy changes from Reform Party, and broader economic concerns.

blockdag

Q2 2024’s Top 5 Cryptos to Buy: BlockDAG, Pepe, Toncoin, Solana and Render

Learn about 2024’s Q2 top 5 cryptos. Explore potential high-return and advancements of altcoins like BlockDAG, Pepe, Toncoin, Solana, and Render.

Fundamental Analysis, Tech and Fundamental, Technical Analysis

GBPCAD Technical Analysis Report 14 June, 2024

GBPCAD currency pair can be expected to fall further toward the next support level 1.7250, former strong resistance from last year.

Digital Assets

Binance acquitted of tax evasion in Nigeria, now faces AML charges

Nigeria has dropped tax evasion charges against two Binance executives, Tigran Gambaryan and Nadeem Anjarwalla, after the world’s largest cryptocurrency exchange appointed a local representative to handle court processes related to the allegations.

Digital Assets

Trezor launches new hardware wallet ‘Safe 5’ with fresh security features

Crypto hardware wallet manufacturer Trezor announced on Friday the launch of its latest flagship product, the Trezor Safe 5, featuring upgraded security to promote self-custody of digital assets.

<