JPMorgan seeks to dismiss claims it helped Ponzi scammer Renwick Haddow

Maria Nikolova

JPMorgan seeks to respond to allegations brought by more than 200 Chinese investors defrauded by Renwick Haddow.

JPMorgan Chase

In line with their previously voiced plans, JPMorgan Chase & Co. (NYSE:JPM) and JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. have sought to dismiss a complaint alleging that the banks helped Ponzi scammer Renwick Haddow.

On Monday, May 14, 2018, the banks filed their Motion to Dismiss a case brought by more than 200 Chinese investors defrauded by Renwick Haddow’s Bar Works entities.

Let’s recall that, according to the plaintiffs, JPMorgan had actual knowledge of the “Bar Works” fraud. The most solid facts which are seen to support the bank’s actual knowledge involve the notoriety and infamy of the Bar Works scheme’s mastermind, Renwick Haddow. He is also known for other fraudulent schemes, including ones involving Bitcoin. The plaintiffs insist that JPMorgan had been aware of Haddow’s true identity and his fraudulent activities while he presented himself under a fake name in communications with “Bar Works” investors.

The defrauded investors assert that JPMorgan aided and abetted Haddow. Their theory is that the bank was required to police transactions in the two Bar Works accounts to protect them from losses, and failed to do so.

In their Motion filed yesterday, however, the banks note that New York law is clear about the obligations of banks. According to the defendants, banks are not, as a general rule, obligated to protect third parties from the misdeeds of their accountholders. A civil action against a bank can be maintained only in the narrow circumstance where the complaint pleads facts sufficient to show that the bank had both actual knowledge of the accountholder’s fraud and substantially assisted it by engaging in conduct beyond the provision of ordinary banking services.

According to JPMorgan, the allegations of the complaint are insufficient to plead that the banks had actual knowledge of Haddow’s alleged scheme. Rather, the complaint is said to be predicated on allegations that the bank should have learned of Haddow’s scheme based on anti-money laundering (AML) laws that require banks to detect and report suspicious activity to the government. These allegations are insufficient as a matter of law: AML laws do not give rise to a private right of action; they do not give rise to duties to private parties; and, in all events, the caselaw is clear that allegations that a bank supposedly ignored “red flags”—which is what the complaint alleges—do not rise to the level of actual knowledge, JPMorgan argues.

Furthermore, according to the defendants, the law is well settled that allegations that a bank provided banking services are insufficient as a matter of law to plead substantial assistance.

JPMorgan argues that the plaintiffs’ claims for unjust enrichment and gross negligence should be dismissed, as the defrauded investors did not have a relationship with JPMorgan sufficient to support unjust enrichment; nor have they pleaded facts showing that the bank was unjustly enriched. Also, according to JPMorgan, the plaintiffs fail to state a claim for gross negligence, because the bank did not owe them any duty.

A response by the plaintiffs is expected by June 25, 2018.

Read this next

Metaverse Gaming NFT

DCentral Miami brings together all of Web3, NFT, DeFi, Metaverse

The world’s biggest Web3 meeting entitled DCENTRAL Miami is set to take place November 28-29, featuring a lineup of some of the biggest and most influential names in the blockchain space.

Digital Assets

Crypto ban expands across UK banks as Starling joins ‎crackdown

UK digital bank Starling has banned ‎all customer payments related to cryptocurrencies, another blow for the crypto traders ‎who recently saw a sizable number of banks deciding not to ‎finance the wobbly asset class.‎


Markets Direct at FIA EXPO 2022: Traders know what they want from brokers

The FIA Expo 2022, one of the most prestigious events within the global derivatives trading industry, took place in Chicago on 14 & 15 November.


FIA Expo 2022: TNS addresses public cloud limitations with hybrid infrastructure

November is the month of the FIA Expo, one of the largest futures and options conferences in the world, bringing together regulators, exchanges, software vendors, and brokers in one place: the Sheraton Grand Chicago Riverwalk. 

Retail FX

Italy’s regulator blacks out Finance CapitalFX, MFCapitalFX

Italy’s Commissione Nazionale per le Società e la Borsa (CONSOB) has shut down new websites in an ongoing clampdown against firms it accuses of illegally promoting investment products in the country.

Retail FX

Suspected leader of Honk Kong ramp-and-dump scam appears in court

A leader of a sophisticated ramp-and-dump scheme made his first court appearance in a Hong Kong court today, charged with market manipulation and various criminal offences. The case stems from an earlier joint operation of Hong Kong’s financial watchdog, the Securities and Futures Commission (SFC), and the local police. 

Institutional FX

Cboe’s James Arrante discusses growing demand for fixed income, FX algo

We caught up with James Arrante, senior director of FX & US treasuries product and business management at Cboe Global Markets, to uncover emerging trends in the FX and fixed income markets and learn more about the bourse operator’s recent initiatives.

Retail FX

Eurotrader acquires UK broker Petra Asset Management

Eurotrader Group has formally entered into the UK market with the acquisition of FCA-regulated broker, previously named Petra Asset Management Ltd. The new entity operates under the brand name Eurotrade Capital Ltd.

Inside View, Retail FX

The Game of Chess Continues – OPEC, China and the Oil Market

Over the past decade, the US has been complaining about the amount of power which the BRIC group, and specifically China, has on the global economy. BRIC stands for Brazil, Russia, India and China; these were the world’s fastest growing economies. Only in the past 10 months, the US has turned their attention toward OPEC due to the prices of fuel. Nevertheless, China seems to have a strong influence even over the price of crude oil.