Do leverage restrictions imposed by regulators really protect retail clients? – Guest Editorial

Natalia Zakharova

“Clients who feel that they have enough competence to trade or just looking for fast returns are pushed towards offshore brokers, who are still able to offer 1:500 leverage. Some brokers are reputable and hold other licenses and just have an offshore entity, but some are just bucket shops” says FXOpen executive Natalia Zakharova

By Natalia Zakharova, Head of Business Development, FXOpen

Several years of regulatory wrangling has culminated in yet another blow to the CFD market, this time at the hands of Australian regulatory authority ASIC, which has today passed new regulations severely limiting how CFDs are sold, executed and marketed, and restricting leverage considerably.

Many FX brokerages worldwide had understood for a very long time now that this was likely to occur, the earliest example of which was explained to FinanceFeeds five years ago by Australian senior FX executive David Batten who raised some very important points concerning ASIC’s clampdown on margin electronic trading firms.

A few years later, Britain’s FCA made significant restrictions to the method by which CFDs are marketed and sold, causing many of the large companies in the UK to form a lobby group, working with the regulator to attempt to reach a middle ground, one of which was IG Group, led by Peter Hetherington who resigned very soon afterwards after a quarter of a century with the firm. Perhaps the David and Goliath battle between the exchanges which were encouraging regulators to bear down on CFD firms so that they could get the retail client bases back onto exchanges.

This would have been the only method by which it would be possible to do that, as electronic trading firms are far more attractive to retail traders than expensive, slow and bureaucratic exchanges.

Now, Australia is following suit in a move that is likely to have a significant impact on the second largest CFD market in the world after the UK, meaning that now, all CFD providers, given that Australia and the United Kingdom are the main target markets, may well have to reconsider their product range.

As far as this new legislation is concerned, ASIC has made a product intervention order imposing conditions on the issue and distribution of CFDs to retail clients.

ASIC’s recent order which was implemented in the latter part of 2020 strengthened consumer protections by reducing CFD leverage available to retail clients and by targeting CFD product features and sales practices that amplify retail clients’ CFD losses. It also brings Australian practice into line with protections in force in comparable markets elsewhere.

Almost all reputable regulators impose leverage restrictions, with ASIC being the most recent one to introduce 1:30 max. leverage available to retails clients.

The clients will be forced to either prove that they are eligible to trade with 1:500 leverage or will have to settle with 1:30 or 1:20, with potentially minimized risks as well as potentially minimized profits.

The regulators say that their decision is based on the number of complaints they receive from the clients, involving insufficient risk warnings and misleading marketing campaigns.

And the restricted leverage and additional regulatory oversight and reporting should provide clients with the much needed protection.

But does this really work in the end?

Trading forex on margin has always been known as a high risk, high reward activity and that is one of the reasons it attracts so many customers.

Clients who feel that they have enough competence to trade or just looking for fast returns are pushed towards offshore brokers, who are still able to offer 1:500 leverage. Some brokers are reputable and hold other licenses and just have an offshore entity, but some are just bucket shops.

While offered the desired leverage, the customers expose themselves to other risks: potential manipulation of prices, inability to turn to a regulator with a complaint, unfair business practices, lack of security of funds.

So the question really is if someone keeps track if the money that the clients have “saved” by trading with 1:30 leverage offsets the losses other customers have incurred when being forced to trade with a shady broker in pursuit of 1:500 trading.

Food for thought and regulators should bear this in mind and consult with the brokerage industry instead of using a steamroller approach which results in more harm than good.

The subject matter and the content of this article are solely the views of the author. FinanceFeeds does not bear any legal responsibility for the content of this article and they do not reflect the viewpoint of FinanceFeeds or its editorial staff.

Read this next

Metaverse Gaming NFT

DCentral Miami brings together all of Web3, NFT, DeFi, Metaverse

The world’s biggest Web3 meeting entitled DCENTRAL Miami is set to take place November 28-29, featuring a lineup of some of the biggest and most influential names in the blockchain space.

Digital Assets

Crypto ban expands across UK banks as Starling joins ‎crackdown

UK digital bank Starling has banned ‎all customer payments related to cryptocurrencies, another blow for the crypto traders ‎who recently saw a sizable number of banks deciding not to ‎finance the wobbly asset class.‎

Interviews

Markets Direct at FIA EXPO 2022: Traders know what they want from brokers

The FIA Expo 2022, one of the most prestigious events within the global derivatives trading industry, took place in Chicago on 14 & 15 November.

Interviews

FIA Expo 2022: TNS addresses public cloud limitations with hybrid infrastructure

November is the month of the FIA Expo, one of the largest futures and options conferences in the world, bringing together regulators, exchanges, software vendors, and brokers in one place: the Sheraton Grand Chicago Riverwalk. 

Retail FX

Italy’s regulator blacks out Finance CapitalFX, MFCapitalFX

Italy’s Commissione Nazionale per le Società e la Borsa (CONSOB) has shut down new websites in an ongoing clampdown against firms it accuses of illegally promoting investment products in the country.

Retail FX

Suspected leader of Honk Kong ramp-and-dump scam appears in court

A leader of a sophisticated ramp-and-dump scheme made his first court appearance in a Hong Kong court today, charged with market manipulation and various criminal offences. The case stems from an earlier joint operation of Hong Kong’s financial watchdog, the Securities and Futures Commission (SFC), and the local police. 

Institutional FX

Cboe’s James Arrante discusses growing demand for fixed income, FX algo

We caught up with James Arrante, senior director of FX & US treasuries product and business management at Cboe Global Markets, to uncover emerging trends in the FX and fixed income markets and learn more about the bourse operator’s recent initiatives.

Retail FX

Eurotrader acquires UK broker Petra Asset Management

Eurotrader Group has formally entered into the UK market with the acquisition of FCA-regulated broker, previously named Petra Asset Management Ltd. The new entity operates under the brand name Eurotrade Capital Ltd.

Inside View, Retail FX

The Game of Chess Continues – OPEC, China and the Oil Market

Over the past decade, the US has been complaining about the amount of power which the BRIC group, and specifically China, has on the global economy. BRIC stands for Brazil, Russia, India and China; these were the world’s fastest growing economies. Only in the past 10 months, the US has turned their attention toward OPEC due to the prices of fuel. Nevertheless, China seems to have a strong influence even over the price of crude oil.

<