Major US stock exchanges fail to dismiss market manipulation allegations in HFT case

Maria Nikolova

New York Court denies the motion to dismiss by BATS Global Markets, Chicago Stock Exchange Direct Edge ECN, New York Stock Exchange, NYSE Arca, Nasdaq OMX BX, and the Nasdaq Stock Market LLC.

Several major US stock exchanges have failed to nix allegations against them in a high-frequency trading case. On Tuesday, May 28, 2019, Judge Jesse M. Furman of the New York Southern District Court denied the Exchanges’ motion to dismiss.

In four actions originally filed in New York, various investors (the plaintiffs) brought claims under Sections 6(b) and 10(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 against seven stock exchanges – BATS Global Markets, Inc., Chicago Stock Exchange, Inc., Direct Edge ECN, LLC, New York Stock Exchange, LLC, NYSE Arca, Inc., Nasdaq OMX BX, Inc., and the Nasdaq Stock Market LLC (collectively, the “Exchanges”) – and two Barclays entities, Barclays PLC and Barclays Capital, Inc.

Section 10(b) of the Exchange Act makes it unlawful “for any person, directly or indirectly, . . . to use or employ, in connection with the purchase or sale of any security . . . any manipulative or deceptive device or contrivance in contravention of such rules and regulations as the [Securities and Exchange] Commission may prescribe as necessary or appropriate in the public interest or for the protection of investors.”

The investors allege that the Exchanges are violating the federal securities laws by providing services to high-frequency trading (HFT) firms in a way that amounts to actionable “market manipulation.” In particular, the investors argue that by providing (or selling) HFT firms services that allow those firms to execute allegedly harmful trading strategies more successfully, the Exchanges have engaged in conduct that adds up to an unlawful manipulative scheme under Securities and Exchange Commission Rule 10b-5 and are therefore liable under Section 10(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.

Of particular relevance to the claims that remain are three services that the Exchanges sell to HFT firms: proprietary data feeds, “co-location” services, and “complex order types.” The crux of the plaintiffs’ Section 10(b) claim is that the Exchanges developed these products and services, sold them to HFT firms and failed to fully disclose these facts to the plaintiffs. The plaintiffs allege that, as a result, they were induced to trade based on artificial price signals, only to see their trades execute at worse prices than advertised, and that the Exchanges’ role in that overall scheme makes them liable to the plaintiffs under Section 10(b) and Rule 10b-5.

In 2015, this Court dismissed Plaintiffs’ claims in their entirety. The plaintiffs then appealed the dismissal of their Section 10(b) claims against the Exchanges. The Court of Appeals vacated the Court’s judgment dismissing Plaintiffs’ claims against the Exchanges, holding that the Exchanges were not absolutely immune from liability for the conduct alleged.

In denying the Exchanges’ Motion to Dismiss on Tuesday, the Court turned to the Exchanges’ arguments with respect to the merits of the plaintiffs’ claims. In doing so, the Court referred to the decision by the Second Circuit, which held that the plaintiffs have “sufficiently pled that the Exchanges created a fraudulent scheme that benefited HFT firms and the Exchanges, sold the products and services at rates that only the HFT firms could afford, and failed to fully disclose to the investing public how those products and services could be used on their trading platforms.”

That holding, Judge Jesse M. Furman said. is obviously binding on the District Court and, thus, conclusively resolves whether the plaintiffs adequately allege the first element of a Section 10(b) market-manipulation claim: that the Exchanges engaged in “manipulative acts.”

The Court concluded that the plaintiffs plausibly allege that the Exchanges’ alleged misconduct was a proximate cause of the economic loss they suffered by trading in the manipulated securities markets hosted on the Exchanges’ platforms. The Court found that the zone of foreseeable risk created by the Exchanges’ allegedly manipulative scheme included the risk that investors trading on the Exchanges’ platforms would be victimized by the very products and services that the scheme allegedly concealed.

The case continues at the New York Southern District Court. 

  • Read this next

    Retail FX

    eToro revives IPO plans after failed $10B SPAC merger

    Israeli social trading network eToro is actively exploring options for a public market listing, according to CEO Yoni Assia in an exclusive interview with CNBC.

    Digital Assets

    Meme Coin Communities Gear Up for the CoinMarketCap Crypto Awards

    CoinMarketCap’s Crypto Awards 2024, the first edition of a new annual event, is captivating the global crypto community. This is especially true for the Meme Coin Of The Year category, where voting has become a battleground for the most passionate and vibrant communities in the crypto space.

    Digital Assets

    Sui Recognized as 2024 Blockchain Solution of the Year at AIBC Eurasia Awards

    The Layer-1 Received the Top Honor at the Eurasia Awards While Experiencing a Period of Unprecedented Growth and Recognition

    Crypto Insider

    Vitalik Buterin, Sandeep Nailwal Lead Decentralized AGI Summit, Address Centralized AI Risks at ETHDenver

    Sentient and Symbolic Capital’s Decentralized AGI Summit will feature leading Decentralized AI authorities like Vitalik Buterin and Sandeep Nailwal.

    Digital Assets

    Aethir Unveils Its First Decentralized AI Node Sale

    Aethir, a leader in decentralized GPU cloud infrastructure, has announced its highly anticipated Node Sale.

    Market News

    Weekly data: Oil and Gold. How they might be affected in the short term?

    This preview of weekly data looks at USOIL and XAUUSD where economic data coming up later this week are the main market drivers for the near short-term outlook.

    Digital Assets

    BitForex goes offline after mysterious $57 million withdrawal

    BitForex, the Hong Kong-based cryptocurrency exchange, abruptly went offline following a mysterious withdrawal of $57 million from its hot wallets. Blockchain detective ZachXBT was among the first to spotlight this, revealing that BitForex has ceased withdrawal transactions and its team appears to be unresponsive.

    Digital Assets

    Should the largest Bitcoin trade be priced in BTC or USD?

    Three days ago, the Bitcoin network witnessed a staggering transaction of 26,139 BTC, valued at $1.347 billion. This recent transaction contrasts sharply with a notable event from 2011, where 500,000 BTC were moved, then valued at around $1.13 million.

    Market News

    EURUSD volatility abound as more Americans buy houses whilst Europe lags behind

    EURUSD volatility has been on the rise, reflecting contrasting trends between the United States and Europe, particularly in the housing market.

    <