Major US stock exchanges fail to dismiss market manipulation allegations in HFT case

Maria Nikolova

New York Court denies the motion to dismiss by BATS Global Markets, Chicago Stock Exchange Direct Edge ECN, New York Stock Exchange, NYSE Arca, Nasdaq OMX BX, and the Nasdaq Stock Market LLC.

Several major US stock exchanges have failed to nix allegations against them in a high-frequency trading case. On Tuesday, May 28, 2019, Judge Jesse M. Furman of the New York Southern District Court denied the Exchanges’ motion to dismiss.

In four actions originally filed in New York, various investors (the plaintiffs) brought claims under Sections 6(b) and 10(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 against seven stock exchanges – BATS Global Markets, Inc., Chicago Stock Exchange, Inc., Direct Edge ECN, LLC, New York Stock Exchange, LLC, NYSE Arca, Inc., Nasdaq OMX BX, Inc., and the Nasdaq Stock Market LLC (collectively, the “Exchanges”) – and two Barclays entities, Barclays PLC and Barclays Capital, Inc.

Section 10(b) of the Exchange Act makes it unlawful “for any person, directly or indirectly, . . . to use or employ, in connection with the purchase or sale of any security . . . any manipulative or deceptive device or contrivance in contravention of such rules and regulations as the [Securities and Exchange] Commission may prescribe as necessary or appropriate in the public interest or for the protection of investors.”

The investors allege that the Exchanges are violating the federal securities laws by providing services to high-frequency trading (HFT) firms in a way that amounts to actionable “market manipulation.” In particular, the investors argue that by providing (or selling) HFT firms services that allow those firms to execute allegedly harmful trading strategies more successfully, the Exchanges have engaged in conduct that adds up to an unlawful manipulative scheme under Securities and Exchange Commission Rule 10b-5 and are therefore liable under Section 10(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.

Of particular relevance to the claims that remain are three services that the Exchanges sell to HFT firms: proprietary data feeds, “co-location” services, and “complex order types.” The crux of the plaintiffs’ Section 10(b) claim is that the Exchanges developed these products and services, sold them to HFT firms and failed to fully disclose these facts to the plaintiffs. The plaintiffs allege that, as a result, they were induced to trade based on artificial price signals, only to see their trades execute at worse prices than advertised, and that the Exchanges’ role in that overall scheme makes them liable to the plaintiffs under Section 10(b) and Rule 10b-5.

In 2015, this Court dismissed Plaintiffs’ claims in their entirety. The plaintiffs then appealed the dismissal of their Section 10(b) claims against the Exchanges. The Court of Appeals vacated the Court’s judgment dismissing Plaintiffs’ claims against the Exchanges, holding that the Exchanges were not absolutely immune from liability for the conduct alleged.

In denying the Exchanges’ Motion to Dismiss on Tuesday, the Court turned to the Exchanges’ arguments with respect to the merits of the plaintiffs’ claims. In doing so, the Court referred to the decision by the Second Circuit, which held that the plaintiffs have “sufficiently pled that the Exchanges created a fraudulent scheme that benefited HFT firms and the Exchanges, sold the products and services at rates that only the HFT firms could afford, and failed to fully disclose to the investing public how those products and services could be used on their trading platforms.”

That holding, Judge Jesse M. Furman said. is obviously binding on the District Court and, thus, conclusively resolves whether the plaintiffs adequately allege the first element of a Section 10(b) market-manipulation claim: that the Exchanges engaged in “manipulative acts.”

The Court concluded that the plaintiffs plausibly allege that the Exchanges’ alleged misconduct was a proximate cause of the economic loss they suffered by trading in the manipulated securities markets hosted on the Exchanges’ platforms. The Court found that the zone of foreseeable risk created by the Exchanges’ allegedly manipulative scheme included the risk that investors trading on the Exchanges’ platforms would be victimized by the very products and services that the scheme allegedly concealed.

The case continues at the New York Southern District Court. 

Read this next

Retail FX

Financial Commission adds FX broker Bold Prime to membership roster

The Financial Commission today announced that it has added Bold Prime to its member roster, which is made up of online brokerages operating in FX, derivatives and cryptocurrency markets.

Digital Assets

Despite crypto winter, Cake DeFi paid out $58 million in Q2 rewards

According to its latest ‘Transparency Report,’ Cake DeFi continued its growth trajectory in the three months through June 2022, even as the entire crypto industry experienced macro challenges this quarter.

Retail FX

SimpleFX Review: Cryptos, Spreads, Pros & Cons

SimpleFX combines years of Forex and cryptocurrency experience with a focus on offering resources to retail traders. 

Retail FX

Ironbeam becomes CME clearing member and launches MT5

“The direct clearing aspect along with our low-latency proprietary trading tools and technology solutions make Ironbeam the ideal trading destination.”

Institutional FX

Top 0.07%: oneZero makes it to Inc. 5000 of fastest growing companies in America

oneZero started out by serving the foreign exchange trading community, developing and executing technology that could scale with the growth of the FX market.

Industry News

CFTC wins case against broker for secretly taking other side of client orders in block trades

“As we said at the outset of this case, the illegal use of inside or confidential information undermines confidence in markets and will not be tolerated.”


BankiFi raises $4.8m to bring embedded banking platform to North America

“Our mission is to make all aspects of cash management and payments easier for SMBs everywhere, and this investment is another huge step to making that a reality.”

Executive Moves

Shieldpay hires ex-Payoneer Chris Andrews as Head of Sales

“We’ll be expanding our position in existing markets and accelerating growth into new verticals, whilst building on our direct and indirect channels.”

Digital Assets secures preliminary approval to operate in Canada, one of the longest-established crypto platforms, has become the first digital asset platform to sign a Pre-‘Registration Undertaking’ with the Ontario Securities Commission (OSC) in Canada.