SEC pushes back against Ripple’s “flawed search” of evidence on XRP

Rick Steves

“The recordings are the best, unadulterated evidence of Ripple’s and the Individual Defendants’ contemporaneous views, treatment, and marketing of XRP during the relevant time period.”

The Securities and Exchange Commission has requested a conference and order compelling Ripple to search and produce video and audio-taped recordings of the firm’s meetings that include the individual defendants Garlinghouse and Larsen as well as other key employees speaking on topics relevant to disputes in the lawsuit.

The plaintiff accused Ripple of having a flawed search methodology that excluded highly probative evidence from its belated production of responsive recordings until the SEC raised these issues with Ripple.

“Ripple agreed to “search all recorded meetings by the custodians of such meetings, meeting name, and other criteria.” But the SEC recently learned that Ripple’s search is not reasonably designed to identify responsive documents for at least two reasons”, said the letter.

“First, Ripple’s definition of “custodian” includes the electronic location in which a recorded meeting was stored – for example, “Ripple videoconference” is the purported “custodian” for many recordings that Ripple has refused to search — rather than the relevant employees who spoke at or attended the meeting.

“Second, where the file name of the recorded meeting provides no information as to whether responsive topics were addressed at the meeting — for example, “Ripple meeting” — Ripple has refused to search the recording’s content”.

“Ripple has insisted that the SEC — which has no access to the recordings or even to Ripple’s list of the recordings, which Ripple has also refused to produce — must identify the specific additional recordings it seeks”.

For those reasons, the SEC asked the Court to reject Ripple’s attempt to shift its own document production obligations to the SEC.

“The recordings are the best, unadulterated evidence of Ripple’s and the Individual Defendants’ contemporaneous views, treatment, and marketing of XRP during the relevant time period. Indeed, the recordings Ripple has produced so far are highly probative of the key disputes in this case.

“Ripple should be required to conduct a reasonable search to identify additional responsive recordings of meetings at which the agreed-upon custodians spoke, regardless of the name of the electronic folder in which such recordings are stored or the titles of their file names.”

The SEC wants to secure evidence that the individual defendants and key employees were aware that XRP could be considered a security as they marketed the digital asset as an investment contract. This is the agency’s strongest case against Ripple.

The plaintiff, however, is responsible for regulatory clarity and it is known that Ripple executives tried to learn the agency’s position on the matter to no avail.

In addition, there are most likely to be issues with the SEC’s security argument given that the technology had been fully developed prior to the sale of XRP.

The SEC has also complained to the Court about Ripple’s close to 30,000 requests for admission. The plaintiff requested a protective order relieving the SEC of any obligation to respond to the 29,947 requests.

The SEC informed the Court that it spent more than 100 hours responding to 254 requests. At that rate, the Plaintiff would need over 473 days to complete the task.

There’s more on Ripple:

Ripple pushes SEC up against the wall: ‘If personal opinions, then no privilege”

Ripple buries SEC in paperwork in XRP lawsuit: Nearly 30,000 requests

Ripple running out of time as BIS ‘conspires’ to end cryptos’ threat to financial system

Ripple responds to Senator Toomey on XRP, the SEC, and how to do better

SEC v. Ripple: XRP’s utility and currency value backed by former U.S. Treasurer

Read this next

Digital Assets

Russian Duma’s working group to address gaps in crypto regulation

A working group formed by the Russian State Duma to tackle the issues of cryptocurrency regulations is set to hold its first meetings, said the head of the parliamentary Financial Market Committee, Anatoly Aksakov.

Digital Assets

Kevin O’Leary says XRP lawsuit is “a very bad idea”

“I have zero interest in investing in litigation against the SEC, that is a very bad idea”.

Industry News

SFC freezes 17 client accounts on suspected ‘pump-and-dump’ scam

Hong Kong’s financial watchdog, the Securities and Futures Commission (SFC), has issued notices to two local brokers, instructing them to freeze certain client accounts suspected of market manipulation.

Retail FX

FSCS starts to offer LCF investors compensation under government scheme

The Financial Services Compensation Scheme (FSCS) has gone live with the government’s redress scheme to reimburse eligible London Capital & Finance victims.

Industry News

Aquis Exchange appoints Glenn Collinson as new Chair

Aquis Exchange, a group of companies that provide services for exchanges, has announced the appointment of Glenn Collinson as its new Chair and he would succeed Niki Beattie effective from January 1, 2022.

Digital Assets

Bitpanda onboards Lydia’s 5.5 million users to white label solution

Lydia has deployed the white label solution, with transactions made by the more than 5 million Lydia customers in a wide range of assets, from crypto to fractional stocks, being executed via Bitpanda for as little as EUR 1.

Digital Assets

Archax deploys Scila AB’s AML and surveillance tech for crypto trading

Scila is very much in tune with digital assets and cryptocurrencies and has some of the largest cryptocurrency exchanges and traders in its client roster.

Institutional FX, Retail FX

ATFX goes all in on US equities: FX broker adds 113 US stock CFDs

With the addition of 113 US stock CFDs, ATFX boasts more than  300 tradable instruments, 273 of which are stock CFD products.

Industry News

Citadel CEO outbids 17,000 crypto investors after winning Short Squeeze Lawsuit

Citadel Securities has been a key source of trading platforms’ revenue, which fed conspiracy theories that the US market maker leaned on their executives to end the short squeeze by restricting users from buying meme stocks.