SEC v. Ripple: SEC refuses to answer interrogation under oath and Ripple ‘suspects why’

Rick Steves

“The SEC refuses to answer […] because, Defendants suspect, a truthful, sworn answer would reveal that no contractual provisions actually bear the weight the SEC intends to place on them.

Defendants Ripple Labs and Chris Larsen have filed their reply to the SEC’s opposition to the motion to compel the SEC to provide clear responses to its interrogatory.

The inquiry regards the application of the Howey Test, particularly in what relates to the sales of XRP over the last eight years.

The defendants first summarized the SEC’s opposition to the motion: “The whole purpose behind the liberal discovery afforded by the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure is to avoid surprise and trial by ambush”, according to the regulator.

The SEC further stated that contention interrogatories are designed to assist parties in narrowing and clarifying the dispute issues in advance of summary judgment practice or trial.

However, the agency continued, Ripple and Chris Larsen’s interrogatories “are crafted precisely to address what Defendants believe are issues as to which there can be no genuine dispute, and which Defendants believe will facilitate the resolution of motions for summary judgment, or narrow the issues at trial.”

The SEC’s arguments fail to address the issue, according to Ripple and Chris Larsen, who stated the SEC has refused to provide basic information.

Given that the SEC has asserted that it may prove the existence of “investment contracts” based on the specific provisions of commercial contracts by which the defendants sold XRP, based on evidence outside the four corners of the contracts, or both, the defendants asked the SEC to identify such provisions.

The SEC’s refusal to answer is because “under Howie’s progeny, the contours of the investment contract may come not just from “contracts” but also from statements made in commerce and the very nature of character of the instruments”.

“That is a non sequitur”, Ripple remarked, pointing that such interrogatory is focused on the contractual language and asks the SEC to identify the terms – if any – in which it plans to rely”.

Ripple suspects why the SEC refuses to answer

“The SEC refuses to answer […] because, Defendants suspect, a truthful, sworn answer would reveal that no contractual provisions actually bear the weight the SEC intends to place on them.

“The same is true regarding the identification of the “common enterprise” in which XRP buyers allegedly invested, among several others.

“Each of these interrogatories addresses issues that Defendants believe are essential elements of their defense, and for each of them, the SEC has transparently refused to provide direct answers to avoid providing supporting evidence.

“The SEC can argue all it wants to the court that truthful answers to these interrogatories are not dispositive under their interpretation of Howie, but what it cannot do is refuse to answer the interrogatories in written”.

Ripple added that the SEC is still equivocating about its most basic allegations and Rule 33 prohibits this gamesmanship.

The legal fight over the interrogatories is seen as a “This is It” moment for XRP in the SEC v. Ripple lawsuit, according to expert analysis by the Hogan attorneys.

Thien-Vu Hogan explained why she predicts Ripple’s motion to compel better answers to interrogatories will be granted in large part and why it’s probably in the SEC’s best interests to amend its answers.

“They aren’t very compelling to me and obviously not very specific and if I was representing the SEC I would want to amend these with an eye towards summary judgment and I think it will be allowed to do so because discovery has not been completed yet”.

Read this next

Digital Assets

Ripple’s string of wins analyzed, XRP lawsuit to drag on until Spring 2022

“Absent a settlement, this case will not be decided until March 2022 at the earliest and possibly not even until late spring if the court decides not to rule on some of the pending motions until after the discovery deadline, which looks really possible”.

Industry News

Stripe partners with BNPL giant Klarna

Stripe, one of the largest payment providers in the world, has announced the launch of a partnership with the BNPL giant Klarna which might prove to be a game-changer as far as the buy-now-pay-later industry is concerned.

Retail FX

ADSS’ UK business reports £3.09 million in 2020 revenues, down 38%YoY

ADSS’ FCA-regulated entity reported its financial results for the year ending December 31, 2020. The company posted a revenue figure that was 38 percent lower than the amount it earned in the fiscal year of 2019.

Retail FX

OANDA hires FX Global Code contributor Lisa Shemie as General Counsel

Lisa Shemie was Chief Legal Officer at Cboe and was part of several working groups under the Global Foreign Exchange Committee, which is responsible for the FX Global Code.

Digital Assets

Saxo Bank boosts Crypto FX offering after $2.5b in turnover since May

Saxo increased maximum position limits and several new crypto instruments, including the first ever US Crypto ETF issued by Proshares last week under ticker BITO.

Digital Assets

Tether tests Notabene for AML in cross border transactions

The Financial Action Task Force (FATF) has issued guidelines holding VASPs to the same standards as regulated financial institutions.

Digital Assets

Mobilum upgrades OTC crypto desk for trades above $50,000

Mobilum added a wide variety of crypto assets, fast settlements, no deposit or withdrawal fees, competitive trading fees, and a personalized service with human traders.

Digital Assets

Trakx launches digital asset trading platform in France

Crypto Traded Indices (CTIs) enhance portfolio diversification and reduce the complexity and fees associated with the setting and reach of positions on many digital and cryptocurrency assets.

Digital Assets

China adds crypto mining to “phased-out” industries, a ban revision or the final nail?

China’s National Development and Reform Commission (NDRC) announced on October 21 that it is seeking public feedback on its proposal to include bitcoin mining on a list of “phased-out” industries. 

<