Services Agreement between FXCM and Effex sparks plaintiffs’ reaction in securities class action

Maria Nikolova

Investors suing FXCM argue that the Court should disregard a number of documents submitted by the broker as extraneous.

fxcm

The “mega lawsuit” against FXCM and a number of its top executives continues at the New York Southern District Court, with the latest point of contention being whether copies of the “Services Agreement” between FXCM and Effex Capital should be considered by the Court or not.

The plaintiffs, who are purchasers of FXCM securities, had argued that the defendants make a number of claims concerning the “Services Agreement,” but had at no point filed this agreement publicly, nor had they attached this purported agreement to their motion papers. “If Defendants decline to supply the Court with the relevant document, it is entirely inappropriate for them to argue on a motion to dismiss that its contents contradict Plaintiffs’ allegations”, the investors argued back in September 2017.

According to the investors, the “order flow” payments made by Effex Capital to FXCM are “a complete sham”. From 2010 to 2014, the plaintiffs say, no market maker besides Effex paid FXCM for order flow. These payments are dubbed to have been merely kickbacks of FXCM’s cut of profits generated by Effex from trading against FXCM’s retail customers. That is, the supposed “order flow” payments were merely disguised profit-sharing payments per FXCM’s arrangement with Effex.

In response, Israel Dahan, who represents the FXCM defendants, filed a declaration in October, with the exhibits attached to it including copies of the “Services Agreement”. The documents are dated March 1, 2010 and May 1, 2010. According to the defendants, the Services Agreement was a pay-for-flow agreement based upon trading volume—not a profit sharing agreement. They refer to the March 1, 2010 Services Agreement explicitly stating that “[Forex Capital Markets, LLC] shall receive from Effex a fee equal to $21.00 USD per one million units of Base Currency . . . for the aggregated volume of Transactions executed via the Trading System.” The May 1, 2010 Services Agreement is materially the same in every respect, except that FXCM Holdings, LLC is substituted for Forex Capital Markets, LLC, the lawyers for the defendants explain.

On Tuesday, November 14th, the plaintiffs sent a Letter Motion to Judge Ronnie Abrams asking for the documents attached as exhibits to Dahan’s Declaration to be disregarded. The plaintiffs argue that these documents should have been provided earlier, when FXCM’s lawyers filed their motion to dismiss. Moreover, the plaintiffs say that they are unable to submit other documents to prove the falsity of the documents submitted by the defendants.

Accordingly, the plaintiffs request that the Court strike or disregard the extraneous documents submitted by Defendants with the Declarations filed by Israel Dahan.

The “mega lawsuit” names Global Brokerage Inc (NASDAQ:GLBR), formerly known as FXCM Inc, and 17 individuals, including directors and senior employees at the brokerage accounting department, as defendants. They are accused of fraud, market manipulation and of filing false financial statements with regulators. This is a federal securities class action on behalf of a class consisting of all persons and entities who purchased or otherwise acquired publicly traded FXCM securities, including FXCM 2.25% Convertible Senior Notes due 2018 and Class A common stock from March 15, 2012 to February 6, 2017.

Read this next

Digital Assets

BlockDAG’s Presale Achieves $9.9M: Aiming For A 5000-Fold ROI As Cardano’s Price Rises And Fantom Launches Sonic

Explore Cardano’s surge, Sonic’s efficiency, and why BlockDAG’s growth makes it the top crypto choice. A deep dive into the future of blockchain investments.

Digital Assets

US, UK probe $20 billion Tether transfers tied to Russian exchange.

U.S. and UK authorities are investigating the movement of $20 billion in the USD-pegged stablecoin tether (USDT) through Moscow-based exchange Garantex.

Digital Assets

BlockDAG Presale Raises $9.9M as Batch 5 Nears Sell-Out Amid Bonk’s Fluctuating Trading Volume & Spell’s Bullish Price

Explore BONK’s trading volume, SPELL’s market shifts, and why BlockDAG’s 10,000 ROI makes it an ideal crypto for savvy investors in 2024.

Digital Assets

Bybit expands into Europe amid regulatory scrutiny

Dubai-based cryptocurrency exchange Bybit is expanding its operations in Europe after encountering regulatory challenges in Hong Kong.

Digital Assets

Cathie Wood’s sponsored Bitcoin ETF sees historic $200 million inflows

The ARK 21Shares Bitcoin ETF (ARKB), co-sponsored by Cathie Wood’s ARK Invest, registered historic inflows exceeding $200 million on Wednesday, signaling a robust appetite among investors for Bitcoin-centric investments.

Digital Assets

Sam Bankman-Fried might see his 25-year sentence halved

Sam Bankman-Fried, the founder of the failed cryptocurrency exchange FTX, was sentenced to 25 years in federal prison by a Manhattan court on Thursday. This comes after he was convicted of defrauding customers and investors, with Judge Lewis Kaplan highlighting the potential future risks posed by Bankman-Fried.

Technical Analysis

EURJPY Technical Analysis Report 28 March, 2024

EURJPY currency pair under the bearish pressure after the pair reversed down from the major resistance level 164.25, which also stopped the sharp weekly uptrend at the end of last year,

Digital Assets

BlockDAG’s Presale Hits $9.9M, MultiversX & MINA Price Predictions Show Green

Read about BlockDAG’s promising $10 prediction and insights on MultiversX Price Prediction as MINA’s potential unfolds.

Digital Assets

Rockstar Co-Founder and All-star Line Up Join Advisory Board to Take Metacade into Post Beta Orbit

Metacade, the revolutionary Web3 gaming platform, prepares to streak out of beta with a slew of ground-breaking initiatives that will redefine the way blockchain games are developed.

<