SIFMA asks SEC to take it slow on its UST clearing plan

Rick Steves

“U.S. Treasury securities are the underlying currency of the financial markets. Market participants need to have confidence in the structure of this market, that it is fit for purpose, that it will do what people expect it to do, and that it can finance the government at low cost.”

SIFMA has commented on the SEC’s proposal, “Standards for Covered Clearing Agencies for U.S. Treasury Securities and Application of the Broker-Dealer Customer Protection Rule With Respect to U.S. Treasury Securities.”

The letter, co-signed by the Institute of International Bankers (IIB), suggests that, rather than moving directly to the implementation of a broad central clearing requirement for Treasury transactions, the SEC follow a more incremental and calibrated process.

UST securities, the underlying currency of the financial markets

Kenneth E. Bentsen, Jr., SIFMA president and CEO, said: “U.S. Treasury securities are the underlying currency of the financial markets. Market participants need to have confidence in the structure of this market, that it is fit for purpose, that it will do what people expect it to do, and that it can finance the government at low cost. SIFMA supports the broad policy objective of enhancing the resiliency and capacity of the Treasury market through carefully calibrated reforms that encourage market participation from a diverse group. However, we believe other actions to strengthen the market—either those which have already been proposed, or initiatives such as infrastructure builds, incentives and further study—should be pursued before further reforms are enacted, so as to minimize unintended negative outcomes for market participants and broader market resilience.”

SIFMA proposes several steps which will ensure that the SEC and the market are able to analyze comprehensively the impacts of additional clearing of Treasury transactions on each segment of the Treasury market and determine that the benefits to any central clearing requirement outweigh the costs. These include:

Increase incentives: The SEC should increase incentives for buy-side and sell side participants to centrally clear Treasury transactions and address barriers to clearing in existing regulations and market infrastructure prior to requiring Treasury transactions to be centrally cleared.

Conduct further study. Prior to introducing a central clearing requirement for Treasury transactions, the SEC should conduct detailed analysis on the costs and benefits of central clearing across market segments and participant types, as well as analyze the overall impact on Treasury market liquidity. It is widely recognized within existing literature on Treasury market structure reform that further detailed study is needed in this Increased central clearing resulting from incentives to centrally clear Treasury transactions would provide additional data for this analysis.

Only if supported by further study, implement a targeted clearing requirement. The SEC should determine whether to proceed with a central clearing requirement only after considering the findings from the cost-benefit analysis, addressing existing barriers to central clearing and implementing proposed changes with respect to customer. If warranted by these analyses, such a requirement should be introduced initially on a targeted basis, focusing on segments of the market that would realize the most net benefit from increased central clearing and that would not otherwise have a natural incentive to centrally clear.

SIFMA continued: “If the SEC determines to move forward with a clearing requirement, based on the limited analysis currently available we would suggest that the SEC first target Treasury cash transactions executed by a direct participant that is an interdealer broker (IDB), as it is more challenging to incentivize clearing in Treasury cash transactions than in Treasury repurchase and reverse repurchase transactions (Treasury Repos) and IDB transactions have been recognized to pose a particular contagion risk due to “hybrid clearing.”

“With respect to Treasury repos, we note there are existing incentives for central clearing due to the ability of dealers to achieve efficiencies with respect to balance sheet capacity through netting trades cleared at a Treasury CCP. Therefore, a central clearing requirement with respect to Treasury repos should only be considered at a later stage if justified by robust analysis. Were the SEC to determine that a central clearing requirement with respect to Treasury repos is warranted, the requirement’s scope should be limited to Treasury repos entered into by a direct participant that is an IDB or by any direct participant and a counterparty that is a broker-dealer or a government securities broker or dealer.
Phase in any clearing requirement. The implementation of any central clearing requirement should be done on a phased basis and at a measured pace commensurate with the size, scope and scale of the implementation program required. A phased implementation will provide a deeper understanding of how targeted changes impact certain market segments or market participants.”

Read this next

Executive Moves

Wombat appoints ex-abrdn Richard Charnock as UK platform turns to Europe

Launched in 2019, Wombat provides a dedicated mobile investing platform – available on both iOS and Android – offering users both range and choice.

Institutional FX

Broadridge integrates Point Focal’s pre and post-market reports

“Point Focal provides a unique lens on the market which will help add alpha to the trading process and these new insights will rapidly improve performance while mitigating execution risk and simplify trading.”


XCritical integrates with Brokeree Solutions, allowing its clients to launch copy trading 

The forex software provider – XCritical, has integrated Social Trading by Brokeree Solutions into their CRM system.

Industry News

HKEX partners with Saudi exchange for cross listings, ESG, Fintech

“The Kingdom of Saudi Arabia, and the broader Middle Eastern region, are one of the world’s most dynamic and exciting economic and innovation hubs and also home to some of the fastest growing investor groups in the world. Hong Kong and HKEX’s markets offer significant opportunities for international investors and corporates, including unrivalled connectivity to the Mainland Chinese markets through our unique Connect programmes. This agreement signals the beginning of even greater collaboration between our companies and our home markets, and we look forward to exploring many future areas of cooperation.”

Executive Moves

CMC Markets Connect relocates APAC team led by Peter Foster to Singapore

“Singapore is a vibrant city and is now undoubtedly seen as Asia’s leading financial hub. The decision to bolster the CMC Markets Connect team here will help us cement the company’s position as a leading provider of multi asset liquidity and comprehensive trading solutions across the region.”

Retail FX

Italian watchdog red flags Olympus Brokers, UnicoFX and Allfina Group

Italy’s Commissione Nazionale per le Società e la Borsa (CONSOB) has shut down new websites in an ongoing clampdown against firms it accuses of illegally promoting investment products in the country.

Retail FX

XTB revenues hits zł1.45 billion in 2022, Q4 earnings disappoint

Poland-based Forex and CFDs broker, XTB has reported its final results for Q4 of 2022 and the full fiscal year ending on December 31, 2022, showing one of its most successful corporate years.

Executive Moves

Lirunex Limited recruits Waleed Salah as head of MENA sales

Maldives-based brokerage firm Lirunex Limited has secured the services of Waleed Salah, who joined the company in the role of its head of sales for the MENA region.

Executive Moves

Trading 212 parts ways with co-founder Borislav Nedialkov

Trading 212 has a void to fill at its FCA-regulated business in London, following the departure of two key players, Raj Somal and Borislav Nedialkov.