Volume of Trading Technologies’ appeals against PTAB decisions grows further

Maria Nikolova

Earlier this week, the company filed another appeal against a Patent Trial and Appeal Board ruling over one of its GUI patents.

Trading Technologies continues to contest decisions made by the Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB) over its GUI solutions. The latest such appeal by the company was entered Federal Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals on January 22, 2018 with the case naming TradeStation Technologies as respondent/appellee.

The case, captioned Trading Technologies Intl. v. TradeStation Technologies Inc. (0:18-bcaag-01443) takes the number of such appeals filed by TT over the past six months to nine. The usual appellees in these cases are TradeStation and Interactive Brokers. These companies have been sued by Trading Technologies over patent infringement. TT has thus far objected to all patent decisions made in favor of TradeStation and Interactive Brokers.

The latest case challenges the decision made by the Patent Trial and Appeal Board on November 17, 2017, over U.S. Patent No. 7,818,247 (Patent ‘247). The Specification of the ’247 patent describes trading tools for trading and monitoring a commodity on an electronic exchange. The tools aim to increase a user’s efficiency and reduce the time it takes to enter an order or quote.

In November last year, PTAB agreed with TradeStation that the claims are directed to well-understood, routine, and conventional steps of receiving market information, color-coding and displaying such information to a trader, who uses the information to facilitate trading a commodity.

For example, the “BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION” section of the ’247 patent explains that it was well known for an electronic exchange to connect to participant computers, allowing traders to participate in the market, by using software that creates specialized interactive trading screens in the traders’ desktops to facilitate trading a commodity. PTAB found no indication in the ’247 patent that the inventors invented gathering market information, displaying it to a trader, and using the information to facilitate trading a commodity. The use of a computer to perform these functions also was known in the art at the time of the invention, and the ’247 patent does not claim any improvement of a computing device.

PTAB has agreed with TradeStation that the problem noted in the Specification of the ’247 patent is not a technical one. Rather, the ’ 247 patent Specification highlights the problem and importance of reducing the time it takes to evaluate market data and enter an order. Informing a trader of certain stock market trends or events is an activity that is financial in nature.

Patent Owner argues that the ’247 patent claims a technological GUI tool that improves upon prior GUIs using a particular combination of GUI features and functionality (the particular makeup, structure and features of a GUI tool), and that the claims solve a technical problem. Patent Owner, however, PTAB noted, does not tie its arguments to the actual claim language to explain how the claimed steps solve a technical problem. The Board did not find, for example, that the patent claims cite improved technological GUI tool or solves a technical problem.

The Board found that the patent claims are directed to the abstract idea of receiving market information, color-coding graphical areas based on market information, and then updating the display based on newly received market information to assist a trader to make an order, which is a fundamental economic practice.

PTAB agreed with TradeStation that the ’247 patent claims simply provide a graphical representation on a computer of what traders have done in their minds since trading began.

As a result, the PTAB determined TradeStation has shown by a preponderance of the evidence that claims 1–21 of the ’247 patent are unpatentable.

Now, Trading Technologies asks the Court to review the PTAB decision.

Read this next

Retail FX

Texas Slaps Forex Scam with Cease and Desist Order

The Texas State Securities Board (TSSB) is following through on its promise to crack down on online trading fraud.

Industry News

JPMorgan Chase to open its UK neobank next week

JPMorgan Chase, the biggest US bank by total assets, will next week launch its City’s digital-only bank, which offers a range of savings and loan products under its ‘Chase’ brand in the UK.

Retail FX

TIOMarkets UK reports $78,461 in 2020 revenues

TIOmarkets’ FCA-regulated entity reported its financial results for the year ending December 31, 2020. The company posted a revenue figure that was nine times the amount it reported in the fiscal year of 2019.

Technology

Equiduct deploys big xyt’s data analytics for equity market structure

“Banks, asset managers, exchanges and market participants across the globe consistently rely on big xyt as an independent reference for equity market structure”.

Retail FX

BDSwiss partners with PayRetailers to address payment landscape in LATAM

PayRetailers’ suite of payment options via single seamless API integration will be available for BDS Markets Ltd. only.

Digital Assets

Coinbase applies for NFA license while awaiting SEC lawsuit

A license from the National Futures Association (NFA) would open the door to cryptocurrency derivatives trading.

Industry News

Euroclear acquires MFEX to enhance offering for fund distributors and fund managers

This transaction brings together two highly complementary businesses.

Industry News

Madoff Victim Fund sends $568 million to 31,000 victims of Ponzi scheme

Bernard L. Madoff used his position as chairman of BLMIS to steal billions from his clients.

Digital Assets

Revolut uses Bitcoin to Pay for its office space

Revolut, the company that is looking to build a financial super app, has used bitcoin to pay for its largest office space in Dallas, Texas to the flexible workspace provider WeWork.

<