China signals a crackdown on its Fintech giants

Darren Sinden

Chinese authorities are thought to have been drafting legislation in areas such as anti-trust and data-use.

Only a few weeks ago one of the worlds richest men, who was on the cusp of launching the world’s largest IPO, was summoned to a crucial meeting with regulators who told him that the business he was hoping to float, Ant Group, no longer met the listing requirements and that the IPO of the $35 billion Fintech could not go ahead, and that major issues had been identified at the business.

The IPO which was scheduled to take place a few days later in Shanghai and Hong Kong was postponed indefinitely.

At first, it was thought that these moves were a sort payback for Jack Ma, who had been openly critical of China’s regulators, and that the authorities had moved to clip his wings, and remind both Mr Ma, and the markets who was in charge, and to do so in a very public way.

And while there may have been something in that theory it now seems as though the Chinese authorities are looking to clamp down on all Fintechs in the country.

On Tuesday, Guo Shuqing, Chinas top banking regulator questioned the power and influence enjoyed by the countries tech giants and suggested that “timely and targeted measures” could be introduced “to prevent new systematic risks”.

The regulators stopped short of mentioning any specific companies or indeed the measures that may be introduced, however Alibaba, Tencent and Baidu are seen as likely candidates.

Chinese authorities are thought to have been drafting legislation in areas such as anti-trust and data-use. Apps such as Alipay and WeChat have massive penetration in Chinese society and have a dominant position in the mobile payments space in the country, some 47% of Chinese cell phone users use mobile payment services.

In 2018 almost 533 billion transactions were recorded on the countries mobile payment networks which had a value of 445.2 trillion Yuan according to research and

Ant Group’s Alipay has 700 million unique users. Whilst rival service WeChat, owned by Tencent, enjoyed sign up rates of 200,000 new users per day in 2019.

US regulators and lawmakers have begun to examine the power and possible monopolies enjoyed by the likes of Google, Facebook, Amazon and Microsoft, and it now seems as though their Chinese counterparts are considering something similar.

Guo Shuqing who is Chairmen of the China Banking and Insurance Regulatory Commission or CBIRC said that

“Facing the rapid growth of fintech, we will adopt a positive and prudent approach. We will encourage innovation while enhancing risk control, so as to address  new problems and challenges,” he said. He also added that promoting fair market competition was a priority but that traditional anti-monopoly rules may not work where Fintechs are concerned.

In November China’s competition regulator the State Administration for Market Regulation published draft rules on what constituted monopolistic or anti-competitive behaviour, which may have been a first in the one-party state.

Additionally, China’s central bank recently drafted new rules around online microlending, which could have implications for WeChat pay, Alipay and their respective parent companies.

Data gathering and use also seem to be a concern to the Chinese authorities, earlier in the year the state legislature passed a new civil code on data protection for individuals that will come into effect in 2021, and as part of his comments yesterday Guo Shuqing said that there was a need for “clarifying data ownership”,  that large technology firms have “de-facto control over data.” and that it was “necessary to clarify data rights of different parties.”

In the past, it has often been necessary to read between the lines of what Chinese authorities say, or don’t say, to be able to interpret their likely course of action, but in this case, it seems pretty clear that the wind is changing and that change may well not be favourable to China’s Fintech behemoths.

Read this next

Retail FX

Malaysia regulator exposes OctaFX clone, shady FB profiles

Malaysia’s financial regulator today warned online investors about the risks of following investment tips made on social-media platforms.

Digital Assets

Crypto trading volume spikes at Swiss bourse amid FTX collapse

The shockwaves from the historic collapse of Sam Bankman-Fried’s crypto empire are still being felt across the industry, but some trading venues are actually doing better because of it.

Executive Moves

CMC Markets adds Camilla Boldracchi to institutional sales

UK’s biggest spread better, CMC Markets has promoted Camilla Boldracchi to take on an expanded role within its institutional sales desk.

Institutional FX

FXSpotStream reports $1.48 trillion in monthly volume for November

FXSpotStream’s trading venue, the aggregator service of LiquidityMatch LLC, reported its operational metrics for November 2022, which moved higher on a yearly basis but reflected weak performance across executed trade volumes when weighed against the figures of the prior month.

Retail FX

Interactive Brokers’ client activity drops 30% YoY

Interactive Brokers LLC (NASDAQ:IBKR) saw 1.95 million daily average revenue trades, or DARTS, in November 2022 compared to 1.96 million transactions in the prior month.

Digital Assets

The rise of Crypto ETPs in traditional exchanges as crypto winter deepens

Institutional investors are increasingly looking at traditional regulated exchanges as their first route into digital assets amid market turmoil caused by the crypto winter and the collapse of several big names within the space, including FTX. Acuiti and Eurex surveyed 191 buy and sell-side firms on their views of the digital assets markets in order […]

Digital Assets

TP ICAP’s crypto arm receives FCA’s go-ahead

UK interdealer broker TP ICAP has received a regulatory go-ahead to launch its cryptocurrency services in the UK. The bid shows that the recent collapse of FTX exchange has done little to damp the interest of big names in running their own crypto business.

Industry News

Coin Signals founder to pay $2,847,743 after prison sentence over crypto Ponzi scam

The U. S. District Court for the Southern District of New York has ordered Jeremy Spence, founder of Coin Signals, to pay $2,847,743 in restitution to victims of a fraudulent virtual currency scheme.

Digital Assets

CME Group goes DeFi: Reference rates and real-time indices of Aave, Curve, Synthetix

“These rates are designed to provide traders, institutions and other users transparency and price discovery across a much broader range of tokens, allowing them to confidently and more accurately value cryptocurrency sector specific portfolios and manage price risk around various blockchain-based projects.”