ASIC imposes restrictions on iBosses over failure to file financial reports

Maria Nikolova

The company, which has been positioning itself as a “leading provider of Entrepreneurship Training”, has failed to submit audited financial reports for the years to end-March 2017 and end-March 2018.

The Australian Securities & Investments Commission (ASIC) has earlier today announced yet another set of measures it has taken against iBosses Corporation Limited, a company that is claiming to be a “global leading provider of Entrepreneurship Training and Development”.

Today, ASIC says it has restricted iBosses from using certain disclosure exemptions when making public offers of securities for failing to lodge financial reports.

In particular, iBosses did not lodge audited financial reports for the years ended March 31, 2017 and March 31, 2018 within the three months required by the Corporations Act.

The company’s securities are currently suspended from trading on ASX. They have been suspended from Official Quotation from July 3, 2017.

Back in September 2017, ASIC has made a determination preventing iBosses and other relevant persons from relying on:

  • (a) the disclosure exemptions for sale offers of securities under section 708A of the Corporations Act;
  • (b) the disclosure exemption for rights issues under section 708AA of the Corporations Act; and
  • (c) the special prospectus content rules under section 713 of the Corporations Act.

ASIC’s determination applied until September 17, 2018.

In the announcement posted today, ASIC says it has made a determination that applies until June 4, 2020 and prevents iBosses from relying on:

  • the disclosure exemptions for sale offers of securities and for rights issues (s 708A and s708AA of the Act); and
  • the reduced prospectus content requirements for continuously quoted securities (s713 of the Act).

ASIC notes that it may impose restrictions on the use of fundraising disclosure exemptions where it considers that an entity has contravened the financial reporting provisions of the Act.

Read this next

Digital Assets

Bybit exits UK market ahead of regulatory changes

Bybit is suspending its cryptocurrency services for users in the United Kingdom due to impending regulations from the country’s Financial Conduct Authority (FCA).

Digital Assets

Binance argues SEC trampled authority set by Congress

Binance, Binance.US, and Changpeng Zhao have jointly filed to dismiss a lawsuit brought by the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) in June.


Oscar Asly replaces Rasha Gad as CEO of M4Markets Dubai

Seychelles-regulated brokerage firm M4Markets has secured a license from the Dubai Financial Services Authority (DFSA) after it has already incorporated its new subsidiary in the Dubai International Financial Center (DIFC).

Retail FX

Capital Index UK reports mitigated loss despite revenue drop

FCA-regulated brokerage firm Capital Index (UK) Limited has released its annual financial report for the year 2022.

Digital Assets

Mike Novogratz’s Galaxy Digital expands in Europe

Galaxy Digital, the New York-based cryptocurrency financial services company founded by Mike Novogratz, is expanding its presence in Europe by appointing Leon Marshall as its first European CEO.

Metaverse Gaming NFT

Turingum Partners with MarketAcross to Drive Web3 Adoption in Global and Japanese Markets

Global blockchain PR leader MarketAcross joins forces with Japanese Web3 specialist Turingum to mutually expand its market reach, aiming to fortify Turingum’s worldwide footprint and MarketAcross’s presence in the lucrative Japanese blockchain landscape.

Digital Assets

Binance to delist all stablecoins in Europe next year

During a public hearing with the European Banking Authority (EBA), an executive from Binance said that the exchange could ultimately delist stablecoins from its European platforms by June 30, 2024.

Industry News

“Unconscionable conduct”: ASIC fines National Australia Bank $2.1m for overcharging customers

NAB faces a $2.1 million penalty for unconscionable conduct, as the Federal Court rules the bank knowingly overcharged customers, and took over two years to rectify the situation.