ASIC issues infringement notice to Interactive Brokers over client’s manipulative stock trading

Maria Nikolova

Interactive Brokers has paid a penalty of $250,000 to comply with the notice.

Electronic trading firm Interactive Brokers LLC has paid a penalty of $250,000 in order to comply with an infringement notice given to it by the Australian Securities and Investments Commission (ASIC).

Interactive Brokers operated an Automated Order Processing (AOP) system that allowed clients to enter Orders into the Chi-X Market and the ASX Market. Depending on best execution, the Orders would be submitted either to the Chi-X Market or routed to a related body corporate of Interactive Brokers for entry into the ASX Market. A client of Interactive Brokers placed a series of bids for shares in Altona Mining Limited (AOH) throughout November and December 2013 using the AOP system.

During November 2013, the client placed 39 Bids through the AOP system—17 Bids were submitted to the Chi-X Market and 26 Bids were routed to the ASX Market, with 4 of those Bids being split between those two markets. The Bids reflected a particular pattern of trading, namely, the Bids that resulted in trades:

  • represented 6.57% of all trades in AOH on both markets but caused 73% of all price increases from the last traded prices of AOH; and
  • only consumed between 0.03% and 24% of AOH that was the subject of Offers at the respective Bid prices.

Also, 22 Bids were for very small volumes of AOH which traded in a way that caused price increases from the last traded price, whereas 31 Bids resulted in trades causing price increases of 0.25c and 0.5c, including to the highest price, or equal to the highest price, at which AOH traded on the particular Trading Day. The investigation found that 13 Bids were placed within 15 minutes of decreases in the price of AOH shares.

During December 2013, the pattern of trading of the client in relation to bids for AOH seen during November continued. In December, the client placed 22 Bids through the AOP system—9 Bids were submitted to the Chi-X Market and 13 Bids were routed to the ASX Market. The Bids reflected the same or similar pattern of trading, namely the 22 Bids caused 19 price increases from the last traded price, and created 16 price increases with Bids valued at less than $150.

The MDP has reasonable grounds to believe that Interactive contravened Rule 5.7.1(b)(iii) on the basis that a Market Participant in Interactive’s position during the relevant period ought reasonably to have suspected that the Bids submitted through Interactive’s AOP system to Chi-X by the client by way of a course of conduct were placed by the client with the intention of creating a false or misleading appearance with respect to the market for, or the price of, AOH shares.

ASIC’s Market Disciplinary Panel accepts that some of the Bids placed by the client during November and December appeared to be genuine Bids to acquire AOH shares. Generally, these Bids were for larger volumes (eg 20,000, 50,000 and 100,000) which resulted in trades that did not impact on the price of AOH shares.

However, a number of Bids placed by the client seemed consistent with an intention to support the share price of AOH because those Bids appear to have been timed to create a price impact at minimal cost. These Bids seemed inconsistent with the actions of a genuine purchaser seeking to acquire AOH shares at the best possible price because the resulting trades consumed a very small proportion of the AOH shares on offer at the Bid prices. The client had an interest in supporting the share price of AOH, given the client’s significant indirect holding in AOH. The penalty payable for this contravention is $170,000.

The rest of the monetary penalty stems from the MDP’s findings that Interactive Brokers’s compliance framework lacked sophistication, and its management lacked the required level of focus to ensure compliance with the Rules. Interactive Brokers’ systems, procedures and resources, when benchmarked against those of its peers, were inadequate, the MDP states. For instance, the pre-trade filters failed to detect a series of Bids of very low value. Interactive Brokers was unaware of the suspicious trading by the client. ASIC detected the suspicious trading and brought it to the attention of Interactive. The MDP rejects any suggestion that, because the market will correct itself, this is justification for not having systems to detect low value Bids creating price increases.

The penalty payable for this contravention is $80,000.

The compliance with the infringement notice is not an admission of guilt or liability, ASIC notes.

Read this next

Retail FX

Investors from Cyprus and Dubai acquire ‘significant stake’ in M4Markets

Seychelles-regulated brokerage firm M4Markets firm has picked up some investment from Cyprus and Dubai based investors in a new funding round that it will be using to grow its business.

Executive Moves

UAE broker Amana elevates Amr Masry to sales director

Amr Masry has been promoted to a new senior role at Amana Capital, becoming the group’s newest Sales Director, following a successful tenure with the UAE-based FX and CFDs broker.

Executive Moves

TopFX promotes Omar Al-Janabi to head of sales and business development

Prime brokerage firm TopFX has strengthened its Middle East operations with the promotion of Omar Al-Janabi, who is taking on an expanded role as global head of sales and business development.

Retail FX

Plus500 says 2022 revenue to be ‘significantly’ ahead of analysts’ estimates

Israeli-based, but London-stock market listed Plus500 said it expects annual revenue and earnings to be ahead of analysts’ estimates even as trading levels normalised from record volumes in the first quarter.

Digital Assets

Crypto derivatives giant BitMEX launches spot market

Crypto exchange BitMEX is looking to branch out of its singular focus on crypto derivatives with a suite of new product offerings. Although derivatives are to remain at the heart of BitMEX’s business, the popular platform will add spot crypto trading as it aims to aggressively grow their user base.

Uncategorized

PrimeXM reports mixed trading volumes for April

PrimeXM has reported weaker trading volumes for April 2022, in line with other institutional and retail platforms that saw the activity of their clients dropped compared to a month earlier.

Digital Assets

DLT Finance approved by BaFin to support brokerage and custody of digital assets

DLT Finance is already partnered with big names within the digital asset space, including Kraken, Bitstamp, B2C2, and Bittrex.

Institutional FX

LUKB taps vestr to launch actively managed products, AMCs

The partnership with vestr goes to show the growing importance of digitising the active investment management space.

Digital Assets

Jewel taps Tokeny to launch stablecoin-as-a-service solution on Polygon

Jewel aims to offer a stablecoin-as-a-service solution to other digital asset and financial institutions B2B, allowing those businesses to provide cheaper, easier and near real time payments with stablecoins issued and redeemable directly at the bank level at Jewel.

<