Barclays seeks to defend itself in “dark pool” case

Maria Nikolova

Barclays affirms that it had expressly disclosed that there were, in fact, “aggressive” traders in LX, but it also claims to have offered a “Liquidity Profiling” tool to protect against such traders.

Bank account for FX firm

Barclays Capital Inc and Barclays PLC (LON:BARC) have sought to defend themselves in a civil action brought by investment banking and securities firm Great Pacific Securities. In court filings, dated October 11, 2017, Barclays aims to dismiss the appeal filed by Great Pacific Securities, a large and sophisticated client of Barclays.

The Plaintiff alleges that Barclays PLC and Barclays Capital Inc. (together, “Barclays” or “Defendants”) violated California’s laws of concealment, false advertising, and unfair competition by misrepresenting certain information concerning the operation of Barclays’ LX – an Alternative Trading System (ATS), also known as “dark pool”.

As FinanceFeeds has previously reported, Great Pacific Securities claims that Barclays has concealed the true extent of aggressive HFT trading in LX, the significant limitations of its safeguards, and manipulations to its trading algorithms to favor LX.

In its response filed with the Court earlier this week, Barclays says it expressly disclosed that there were, in fact, “aggressive” traders in LX. The bank adds that the Plaintiff never chose to use the optional Liquidity Profiling tool, thereby undermining Plaintiff’s claim that it supposedly wanted to avoid transactions with “aggressive” HFTs.

The “Liquidity Profiling” service was launched by Barclays in January 2012. Rather than blocking by counterparty type, this optional product allowed blocking based on whether Barclays rated a counterparty’s trading “aggressive,” “neutral,” or “passive.” Clients could, for example, “disable their orders from interacting with [ELP] traders” with “aggressive” flow and allow “neutral” or “passive” ELP flow to execute against their orders.

Regarding the allegations by the Plaintiff that it would have acted differently, had it known about Barclays’ alleged interaction with HFT firms, Barclays says that the Plaintiff fails to explain with any plausibility how it would have done that. Indeed, Barclays notes, Plaintiff’s admission that it continued to trade in LX and use Barclays’ algorithms after learning of Barclays’ alleged misconduct belies entirely any claim of reliance.

Barclays requests that Ninth Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals should affirm the District Court’s decision that Plaintiff failed to plead damages, as Great Pacific Securities provides no factual support for the allegation that it was harmed when HFTs in LX were allegedly able to “skim” information about Plaintiff’s trades to its detriment, or that its clients did not receive “best execution” when trading in LX or using Barclays’ algorithms or router.

Regarding the claims that Barclays violated the advertising laws, the bank demands that this Court affirms the District Court’s dismissal of these claims as the alleged misrepresentations were not transmitted to the public at large, and thus do not constitute “advertising”.

Great Pacific Securities also referred to the settlements that Barclays reached with the New York Attorney General (NYAG) and the US Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) in January 2016 over the operations of LX. In these settlements, Barclays admitted that, from December 2011 through June 2014, it misled its clients and violated securities laws. In its latest filings with the Court, Barclays notes that Great Pacific Securities acknowledges that it continued to submit trades to LX after the NYAG’s allegations became public and therefore cannot plausibly allege that it would not have used these products had it known of the information.

The case is captioned Great Pacific Securities v. Barclays Capital Inc., et al (0:16-cv-56804).

Read this next

Digital Assets

Alameda sues Voyager Digital to recover $445 million

FTX’s failed trading arm, Alameda Research, asked a court to claw back $445 million from Voyager Digital, which it said SBF’s empire paid to the crypto lender before collapsing into bankruptcy.

Metaverse Gaming NFT

Toyota taps Astar Network to explore Web3 in grand style

Although the crypto ecosystem has faced its fair share of bumps, Japanese automaker Toyota is seemingly bullish about the space and continue to look at Web3 as a promising opportunity.

Digital Assets

Bitcoin dominates inflows into crypto funds, AuM hits $28B

As the price of bitcoin continues to consolidate around recent highs, investors expand their positions in funds designed to profit from further appreciation in the cryptocurrency.

Institutional FX

Fiserv secures major payment institution licence in Singapore

Brookfield-based financial services technology provider Fiserv Inc has obtained nod for a Major Payment Institution license in Singapore.

Institutional FX

Finalto expands NDFs line-up with Taiwanese dollar

Finalto announced today that it has expanded its non-deliverable forwards (NDFs) offering with the addition of Taiwan’s dollar to its trading platform.


It’s time for FX to Harness Crypto’s Potential

Jonathan Cumberlidge, FX Sales Director for BVNK, makes the case for cryptocurrencies in improving the efficiency and flexibility of foreign exchange trading.

Digital Assets

Owner of OptionMint, OptionKing, and OptionQueen gets 30 months in prison

A US federal judge has sentenced Ohio resident Jared Davis, who was found guilty for his participation in a multi-million fraud scheme carried out by Israeli-run binary options websites.

Executive Moves

iS Prime co-founders Raj Sitlani and Jonathan Brewer leave, but “business as usual”

“For our clients and teams at iS Prime, iS Risk and iS Prime Hong Kong, it is business as usual. We will be increasing our investment in our technology and staff, putting our clients first as we drive the business forwards to maintain our market leadership position.”

Digital Assets

Germany-focused DekaBank taps METACO for digital asset custody offering

“Digital assets are a critical part of the future, a radical new way for how assets will be represented, from currencies to real estate.”