TIBCO Software seeks more than $22 million from GAIN Capital due to software over-deployment

Maria Nikolova

TIBCO seeks more than $22,064,629 based on GAIN’s alleged unauthorized use of TIBCO software without a license, including support and maintenance fees.

It’s official – the mediation negotiations that GAIN Capital and TIBCO Software agreed on in January this year have not born the desired result. As per the latest court filings with the California Northern District Court, TIBCO continues to insist that it is owed a heavy sum by the broker because of alleged over-deployment of its software. To be more precise, TIBCO says it is owed more than $22 million for unauthorized use of its software by the online trading major.

Let’s recall that TIBCO’s complaint asserts a number of claims against GAIN, including breach of contract; breach of the implied covenant of good faith and fair dealing; and copyright infringement.

The claims all relate to GAIN’s alleged over-deployment of certain products of TIBCO. On May 18, 2016, TIBCO notified GAIN that it intended to audit GAIN’s compliance with its use of the license. TIBCO hired KPMG to conduct an on-site audit in August 2016. KPMG produced a final deployment report, based on its August 2016 audit, which indicated that GAIN had over-deployed TIBCO software.

In 2016, the parties entered into another license agreement covering nine units of TIBCO ActiveSpaces Enterprise Edition, fifty-nine (59) units of TIBCO Enterprise Message Service, and eighty-one (81) units of TIBCO Hawk software. GAIN was required to make payment within 30 days.

GAIN refuses to pay licensee fees for the additional units deployed outside of the enterprise terms pursuant to the 2008 and 2010 licenses—worth more than $20 million including associated maintenance costs—and has refused to pay any of the more than $6 million it owes TIBCO under the separate 2016 license agreement.

In September last year, Judge Edward J Davila of California Northern District Court sided with GAIN Capital Group LLC and dismissed some of the claims in the case.

But now the parties in the lawsuit are clashing again.

TIBCO seeks at least the following relief:

  • In excess of $22,064,629 based on GAIN’s unauthorized use of TIBCO software without a license, including support and maintenance fees.
  • $5,243,800 comprised of invoices pursuant to the 2016 License Agreement.
  • Late Fees in excess of $1 million.
  • All damages available under the Copyright Act, including, at TIBCO’s election, either actual damages and disgorgement of profits, or the maximum statutory damages allowed;
  • A permanent injunction, enjoining GAIN and its employees, officers, parents, subsidiaries, and agents from using the Copyrighted Works;
  • For pre-judgment and post-judgment interest at the legal rate;
  • For TIBCO’s reasonable attorney’s fees, and other costs of suit incurred pursuant to the applicable license agreements, including the 2008 Terms and Conditions, which state in part: “Licensee agrees to pay all reasonable costs (including reasonable attorneys’ fees) incurred in collecting past due amounts under this Agreement.”

GAIN, on the other hand, anticipates seeking rescission of the 2016 Order Form. If liability is established, GAIN contends damages should be calculated on the basis of the correct methodology and relevant definitions provided by TIBCO to GAIN in Enterprise End of Term Deployment Record sent to GAIN in March 2016.

The case is captioned TIBCO Software Inc., v. Gain Capital Group, LLC (5:17-cv-03313).

Read this next

Metaverse Gaming NFT

DCentral Miami brings together all of Web3, NFT, DeFi, Metaverse

The world’s biggest Web3 meeting entitled DCENTRAL Miami is set to take place November 28-29, featuring a lineup of some of the biggest and most influential names in the blockchain space.

Digital Assets

Crypto ban expands across UK banks as Starling joins ‎crackdown

UK digital bank Starling has banned ‎all customer payments related to cryptocurrencies, another blow for the crypto traders ‎who recently saw a sizable number of banks deciding not to ‎finance the wobbly asset class.‎


Markets Direct at FIA EXPO 2022: Traders know what they want from brokers

The FIA Expo 2022, one of the most prestigious events within the global derivatives trading industry, took place in Chicago on 14 & 15 November.


FIA Expo 2022: TNS addresses public cloud limitations with hybrid infrastructure

November is the month of the FIA Expo, one of the largest futures and options conferences in the world, bringing together regulators, exchanges, software vendors, and brokers in one place: the Sheraton Grand Chicago Riverwalk. 

Retail FX

Italy’s regulator blacks out Finance CapitalFX, MFCapitalFX

Italy’s Commissione Nazionale per le Società e la Borsa (CONSOB) has shut down new websites in an ongoing clampdown against firms it accuses of illegally promoting investment products in the country.

Retail FX

Suspected leader of Honk Kong ramp-and-dump scam appears in court

A leader of a sophisticated ramp-and-dump scheme made his first court appearance in a Hong Kong court today, charged with market manipulation and various criminal offences. The case stems from an earlier joint operation of Hong Kong’s financial watchdog, the Securities and Futures Commission (SFC), and the local police. 

Institutional FX

Cboe’s James Arrante discusses growing demand for fixed income, FX algo

We caught up with James Arrante, senior director of FX & US treasuries product and business management at Cboe Global Markets, to uncover emerging trends in the FX and fixed income markets and learn more about the bourse operator’s recent initiatives.

Retail FX

Eurotrader acquires UK broker Petra Asset Management

Eurotrader Group has formally entered into the UK market with the acquisition of FCA-regulated broker, previously named Petra Asset Management Ltd. The new entity operates under the brand name Eurotrade Capital Ltd.

Inside View, Retail FX

The Game of Chess Continues – OPEC, China and the Oil Market

Over the past decade, the US has been complaining about the amount of power which the BRIC group, and specifically China, has on the global economy. BRIC stands for Brazil, Russia, India and China; these were the world’s fastest growing economies. Only in the past 10 months, the US has turned their attention toward OPEC due to the prices of fuel. Nevertheless, China seems to have a strong influence even over the price of crude oil.