Big US stock exchanges face opposition in market manipulation case

Maria Nikolova

The plaintiffs argue the Court should nix the motion for an interlocutory appeal filed by BATS, Chicago Stock Exchange, Direct Edge, Nasdaq and NYSE.

About a fortnight after some of the biggest US stock exchanges filed their Motion for an interlocutory appeal in a market manipulation case, the plaintiffs in the case have argued against the Exchanges’ request.

According to documents filed with the New York Southern District Court on July 1, 2019, and seen by FinanceFeeds, the plaintiffs in the case – the City of Providence, Rhode Island, Plumbers and Pipefitters National Pension Fund, Employees’ Retirement System of the Government of the Virgin Islands, and State-Boston Retirement System, oppose the defendants’ Motion to Certify Opinion and Order for Interlocutory Appeal.

Let’s recall that the lawsuit was brought by various investors (the plaintiffs) under Sections 6(b) and 10(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 against BATS Global Markets, Inc., Chicago Stock Exchange, Inc., Direct Edge ECN, LLC, New York Stock Exchange, LLC, NYSE Arca, Inc., Nasdaq OMX BX, Inc., and the Nasdaq Stock Market LLC.

Section 10(b) of the Exchange Act states that it is unlawful “for any person, directly or indirectly, . . . to use or employ, in connection with the purchase or sale of any security . . . any manipulative or deceptive device or contrivance in contravention of such rules and regulations as the [Securities and Exchange] Commission may prescribe as necessary or appropriate in the public interest or for the protection of investors.”

The investors allege that the Exchanges are violating the federal securities laws by providing services to high-frequency trading (HFT) firms in a way that amounts to actionable “market manipulation.” In particular, the investors argue that by providing (or selling) HFT firms services that allow those firms to execute allegedly harmful trading strategies more successfully, the Exchanges have engaged in conduct that adds up to an unlawful manipulative scheme under Securities and Exchange Commission Rule 10b-5 and are therefore liable under Section 10(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.

In May 2019, the Court sided with the plaintiffs and nixed the Exchanges’ motion to dismiss the complaint against them.

On June 17, 2019, BATS Global Markets, Inc., Chicago Stock Exchange, Inc., Direct Edge ECN, LLC, The Nasdaq Stock Market LLC, Nasdaq OMX BX, Inc., New York Stock Exchange, LLC, and NYSE Arca, Inc. filed a motion with the New York Southern District Court requesting that the Court certify for interlocutory appeal the Opinion and Order denying their renewed motion to dismiss the second consolidated amended complaint (“SCAC”) from May 28, 2019.

The Exchanges argued that the Court’s decision leaves room for differences of opinion. They noted that the plaintiffs did “not allege that they transacted in any particular security at any particular price, or how that price was supposedly affected by the alleged manipulation.”

According to the Exchanges, having simply alleged that the plaintiffs’ bought and sold unidentified stock on unidentified markets at unidentified times and unidentified prices without alleging that they suffered losses attributable to specific transactions, it is equally plausible that the plaintiffs were not injured at all or perhaps even benefitted from the alleged manipulation.

Further, the Exchanges argue that although the Court concluded that it was sufficient for the plaintiffs to allege that they purchased or sold unspecified securities, there is substantial ground for disagreement on this question.

In their response to the Exchanges’ motion for appeal, the plaintiffs note that the defendants’ main underlying argument is that the plaintiffs did not allege specific losses on specific securities that they traded during the Class Period. But, the plaintiffs stress, the defendants fail to address the fact that appellate review of this issue would not end the litigation even if the defendants were correct on the law – and they are not. For instance, with respect to Article III standing, the plaintiffs could amend the complaint by listing their thousands of class-period transactions, which would put them in the same position as the plaintiffs in Whole Foods, 858 F.3d 732, where Article III standing was adequately alleged.

And the issue of which of the plaintiffs’ transactions resulted in damages from the Exchanges’ market manipulation (which the Court properly recognized cannot be answered at this procedural stage in a market manipulation case) will soon be answered (and properly so) through discovery, the plaintiffs say.

Thus, according to the plaintiffs, the Exchanges are improperly seeking to raise these issues now through a §1292(b) motion precisely because they will soon become moot through discovery.

Finally, the plaintiffs stress that, rather than expedite the time until trial, there is a substantial risk that interlocutory review will not only fail to dispose of all issues raised but will also prolong the case and lead to piecemeal litigation.

Read this next

Digital Assets

Coinbase CEO says Chase UK’s ban on crypto “totally inappropriate”

Coinbase CEO Brian Armstrong criticized Chase UK’s decision to restrict cryptocurrency-related transactions in the UK. He called the move “totally inappropriate” and expressed his disagreement with the bank’s decision to ban its UK customers from conducting debit card or wire transfers related to cryptocurrencies.

Digital Assets

Binance CZ refutes any connection with CommEX

Changpeng “CZ” Zhao, the founder and CEO of Binance, has denied being the owner of CommEX, the company that reportedly acquired Binance’s business in Russia.

Institutional FX

Refinitiv’s spot FX volumes hit 8-month low

Refinitiv, the former Financial and Risk business of Thomson Reuters, today reported that the average daily volumes (ADV) of currency trading were $424 billion last month on the company’s main FX trading services.

Executive Moves

Integral hires industry veteran Paul Arnold as liquidity manager

Integral, a technology provider to the financial markets’ buy-side, has appointed Paul Arnold, a highly experienced FX industry professional, as its liquidity manager, according to information made public on his Linkedin profile.

Digital Assets

Terraform’s Do Kwon challenges US extradition request

Do Kwon, the crypto entrepreneur and former CEO of Terraform Labs, is opposing the U.S. Securities Exchange Commission’s request to question him about the crash of his company’s stablecoins Terra and Luna.

Digital Assets

Coinbase gets nod to offer futures for retail customers

Coinbase International Exchange has received regulatory approval from Bermuda’s financial regulator, the Bermuda Monetary Authority (BMA), to allow eligible non-US retail customers to trade perpetual futures contracts.

Inside View

How brokers can win the trading tech wars: Insights from iFX EXPO 2023

Last week’s iFX EXPO International 2023, held at the City of Dreams Mediterranean Integrated Resort in Limassol, Cyprus, welcomed a series of insightful discussions. A panel that particularly stood out focused on the role and evolution of trading technology.

Crypto Insider

Web3 Transformation: Radix’s Babylon Update Redefines User and Developer Engagement

Radix Publishing leaps forward in the decentralized world with the release of the Babylon mainnet upgrade, bridging the gap between innovative tech and user-friendly DeFi experiences.

Digital Assets Joins Forces with PayPal and Paxos for Enhanced PYUSD Exchange Experience collaborates with PayPal and Paxos to fortify its position as the premier exchange for PYUSD, marking a significant milestone in the global crypto landscape.