FCA to continue firm visits dedicated to payment for order flow checks

Maria Nikolova

Nearly all of the brokers the FCA has visited have now stopped charging PFOF where they consider themselves as acting in an agency-like capacity.

The UK Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) has published an update on its work regarding Payment for Order Flow (PFOF), indicating it will continue to monitor firms to check about possible PFOF arrangements.

Let’s recall that Payment for Order Flow (PFOF) occurs when an investment firm (typically a broker) that executes orders on behalf of its client receives a fee/commission from the client that originates the order, as well as from the counterparty the trade is then executed with (typically a market maker or other liquidity provider). These payments result in a conflict of interest between the firm and its client by incentivising the firm to execute its client orders with counterparties willing to pay the highest commission and so undermine the firm’s ability to act as a good agent.

In December 2017, the UK regulator published a “Dear CEO letter”, underlining its position on PFOF. The letter also set out the FCA’s expectations on the practice in the context of MiFID II, particularly its strengthened conflicts of interest regime.

Subsequently, the FCA Business Plan 2018/2019 outlined supervisory work on PFOF as one of the FCA’s priorities to address conflicts of interest in the wholesale sector. The FCA said this work would focus on ensuring that firms are complying with the strengthened standards in MiFID II.

Before the implementation of MiFID II, the FCA found that most firms had stopped charging PFOF for retail and professional client business. However, market intelligence suggested that some firms were still charging PFOF for ECP business. Intelligence also suggested that some brokers were considering various avoidance tactics so they could continue to charge PFOF after MiFID II implementation. This was the context for the ‘Dear CEO’ letter on PFOF in December last year.

As a result, the FCA current supervisory work has focused on PFOF charged by firms for ECP business, following the implementation of MiFID II.

The FCA supervisory work to date suggests that there have been several developments in the market since January 2018.

Nearly all of the brokers the FCA has visited have now stopped charging PFOF where they consider themselves as acting in an agency-like capacity, regardless of the client’s categorisation.

Many of the brokers the FCA has visited still charge both sides of a transaction for what they characterise as interdealer-broking business, where they do not consider themselves to be acting in an agency capacity. These instances are now the vast majority of transactions where brokers charge both sides of a transaction. The regulator is currently gathering more information about brokers’ activities for this type of business. This is set to enable the FCA to assess whether firms are applying consistent judgements across the market that align with the rules on managing conflicts of interest.

The regulator has also identified isolated evidence of behaviour, in the context of providing an agency-like service to clients, whereby a broker seeking liquidity from liquidity providers has been wrongly defined as a service to those counterparties, with a corresponding charge being levied on the liquidity provider. The FCA will take action against firms who characterise their relationship with liquidity providers in a way that does not reflect economic reality and which are PFOF arrangements.

Furthermore, the FCA has received reports of some brokers booking transactions to overseas offices so they could argue that they were allowed to charge PFOF. The regulator says it will continue to examine brokers’ order routing to overseas entities for any evidence of circumventing behaviour that breaches the FCA rules; for instance, when relevant orders are handled at any stage by a UK broker but are subject to two-sided charging contrary to the FCA PFOF position.

The FCA will continue its program of firm visits. These will evaluate how robust firms’ systems and controls are for monitoring adherence to all relevant rules, policies and procedures on PFOF. Firms should note that, for a given transaction, they should analyse the capacity in which they and the different counterparties involved act, rather than look to their or these counterparties’ general business models.

The UK regulator notes that its work will include scrutiny of the specific controls for correctly classifying individual transactions, such as what a firm classifies as interdealer broking activities. The FCA will also look at the policies applied by firms, focusing particularly on how they manage potential conflicts, and the extent of their compliance monitoring and oversight activity.

Read this next

Industry News

UK FCA provides guidance ahead of anti-greenwashing rule

“Consumers care about investing in products that have a positive impact on the planet and people. That’s why we want to boost the integrity of the market and ensure people can make informed decisions about how to invest their money.”

Retail FX

Moomoo onboards 100,000 Malaysian clients in six weeks

“We are committed to enhancing the investment experience with smarter tools and deeper insights. Our mission is to not only grow with the Malaysian market but to lead it, shaping the future of investing in the region.”

Institutional FX

Clearwater completes acquisition of Wilshire’s analytics solutions

“Our vision is to create the preeminent investment management solution for firms around the globe. Clearwater’s integrated platform eliminates the need for multiple data reconciliations, serving as a reliable singular source of truth.”


BizCuits integrates DXtrade platform for CFD brokers and props

The DXtrade platform features built-in trading journals, performance dashboards, responsive charting, and mobile trading apps.


Decoding Bitcoin’s Future: Bybit Insights on Halving, ETFs, and Macro Shifts

In a riveting panel discussion hosted by Bybit, one of the world’s top three crypto exchanges by volume, key figures from the crypto industry gathered to discuss crypto and global finance.

Digital Assets

CoinMENA taps Zodia Markets for enhanced liquidity

“With Zodia Markets we substantially enhanced our service offering and can provide investors with more efficient avenues for entering and exiting the digital assets market, with minimal transaction costs and efficient settlement.”


BlockDAG’s Rise: A Potential $20 By 2027 Against Bitcoin And Ethereum Classic’s Fluctuations, Achieving $19.5M In Presale

With projections setting BlockDAG’s value to soar to $20 by 2027, its innovative ASIC mining rigs and a strategic lunar keynote teaser enhance its allure as the top long-term cryptocurrency investment.


Unveiling the KARRAT Protocol: Pioneering the Next Era of Gaming, Entertainment, and AI Innovation, Reshaping Hollywood and Beyond

$KARRAT is the governance token of the KARRAT Protocol. Using $KARRAT, the community will determine how the KARRAT Protocol is integrated into games and products, empowering the community of players and consumers, much more than traditional entertainment titles have.

Digital Assets

FTX customers drop claims against Sam Bankman-Fried

Former FTX CEO Sam Bankman-Fried has reached a preliminary settlement agreement with a group of FTX customers who have decided to drop their class action lawsuit against him.