FXCM, Drew Niv and William Ahdout strike back in “mega lawsuit”

Maria Nikolova

According to the defendants, the plaintiffs had a duty to take reasonable action to minimize any allegedly sustained damages.


After a short delay, Global Brokerage, Inc. formerly known as FXCM Inc., Dror Niv, and William Ahdout have filed their answer and defenses in the so-called “mega lawsuit” brought by stockholders of FXCM Inc. 

The lead plaintiffs in this case – 683 Capital Partners, LP and Shipco Transport Inc., and named plaintiffs Sergey Regukh and Brian Armstrong, have brought this action, alleging that, from March 15, 2012 until February 6, 2017, the defendants committed securities fraud in violation of Sections IO(b) and 20(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and Rule l0(b)-5. Specifically, the plaintiffs allege that the defendants were responsible for false or misleading statements with respect to the company’s purported agency-trading model and FXCM’s relationship with another company, Effex.

On March 28, 2019, the Court concluded that the second amended complaint adequately alleges that FXCM, Niv and Ahdout have committed securities fraud with respect to statements or omissions concerning FXCM’s supposed agency-trading model, the Company’s purported “order flow” payments with Effex, and Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (“GAAP”).

The defendants filed their answer with the New York Southern District Court on May 13, 2019. The document, seen by FinanceFeeds, enlists 46 affirmative defenses. Let’s note that the statements contained in the affirmative defenses are merely statements – at this point, there are no arguments supporting these statements, nor are there any details regarding these statements.

Let’s mention some of these affirmative defenses:


Plaintiffs’ claims are barred, in whole or part, because Plaintiffs and members of the purported class had actual or constructive knowledge of the acts and omissions complained of and therefore assumed the risk of any alleged damages proximately caused thereby.


Plaintiffs’ claims are barred, in whole or part, because of the contribution of or the comparative fault and contributory negligence of Plaintiffs or other entities or persons.


Plaintiffs’ claims are barred in whole or in part by Plaintiffs’ own actions, omissions and/or negligence.


Plaintiffs and members of the purported putative class at all relevant times had a duty to take reasonable action to minimize any damages allegedly sustained as a result of the facts alleged in the Complaint. Plaintiffs and members of the purported putative class failed to comply with that duty and are therefore barred from recovering any damages that might reasonably have been avoided.


Plaintiffs’ claims are barred because Plaintiffs have failed to allege, and have not suffered, any cognizable injury attributable, in whole or in part, to any conduct by Defendants. Any damages which Plaintiffs seek to recover against the Defendants were in fact caused by actions or omissions of Plaintiffs and members of the purported putative class and/or third parties.

Here are a couple of defenses regarding the alleged misstatements made by the defendants:


Plaintiffs’ claims against Defendants are barred, in whole or in part, because the alleged misstatements were mere puffery or were vague statements of optimism.


The claims are barred, in whole or in part, because the alleged misrepresentations are non-actionable statements that contain expressions of opinion that Plaintiffs have not alleged, and cannot prove, were not truly held.

Finally, the defendants argue that they at all times acted in good faith and in reasonable reliance upon the representations, reports, expert opinions and advice of others. They insist they were entitled to, and did, rely upon representations, reports, expert opinions and advice of others in affixing their signatures to, and authorizing the public filings at issue.

“They believed that those individuals upon whose representations, reports, expert opinions and advice they relied were, in fact, expert in their field and were competent to render the opinions they had provide. Defendants had no notice, and had no reasonable grounds to believe, that the representations, reports, expert opinions and advice provided were in any way inadequate, unfounded or incorrect”.

Read this next


SteelEye tries ChatGPT for market surveillance

This capability can be used as a starting point for initiating a surveillance investigation and to standardize workflow processes to boost the throughput and consistency of cases. It is also useful when analyzing communications in foreign languages, as the system returns the above insights in English regardless of the languages being used.

Industry News

SEC charges ex-Morgan Stanley advisor of NBA players after $13m fraud

Darryl Matthew Cohen was arrested this week and is facing three different federal counts of fraud, which could amount to 20 years in prison if convicted, besides the SEC complaint. 

Industry News

AWS FinTech Africa Accelerator launched, applications until April 27, 2023

Founders will be offered tech resources, expert guidance, and a global network of industry leaders, technologists, entrepreneurs, investors, associations, and partners, in order to build their fintech products. 

Industry News

Interactive Brokers pays unmatched interest up to USD 4.33% on cash balances over $10,000

For clients of Interactive Brokers, interest accrues daily, and payments are posted on a monthly basis. Interactive Brokers’ cash management is integrated into client broker accounts, making it simple to earn interest and borrow at the lowest rates without transferring cash.

Retail FX

FP Markets adds cTrader to roster of trading platforms that include MT4, MT5, Iress

“Our market share swings towards the more sophisticated segment of traders and we have been inundated with requests for an additional platform with more institutional-style characteristics. The addition of the cTrader trading platform offering allows our clients the choice to further shape their trading experience with us.”

Digital Assets

SEC mulls lawsuit against Coinbase’s staking and spot trading

Shares in Coinbase fell 15 percent after the US Securities and Exchange Commission threatened a potential enforcement action against the crypto exchange over certain products.

Digital Assets

Kraken halts ACH transactions amid banking crisis

San Francisco-based cryptocurrency exchange Kraken says it will no longer process Automated Clearing House (ACH) following the failure of its payments partner, Silvergate Bank.

Digital Assets

French influencers face two years in jail for promoting crypto products

France’s National Assembly’s Economics Committee voted in favor of a law that bans social media influencers from touting risky financial services, including cryptocurrencies.


Exberry’s Guy Melamed on paradigm shift with cloud-native exchanges at FIA Boca 2023

FinanceFeeds Editor-in-Chief Nikolai Isayev spoke with Guy Melamed about Exberry’s cloud-native exchange SaaS platform certified by AWS to bring about a paradigm shift in the industry at a time of cybersecurity concerns.