GBP could become THE number 1 major currency - just watch the liquidity!

GBP could become THE number 1 major currency – just watch the liquidity!

Andrew Saks

How did the GBP flash crash really happen? Why will the GBP be the currency to lead the entire range of majors very soon? Why does credit and liquidity mean more than European trade agreements? We investigate

The British Pound has for very many years been the strongest currency in the world, and still remains so, yet it has played second fiddle to the US Dollar as far as the benchmark currency for FX trading is concerned, even despite the Tier 1 banks – the uppermost level of the liquidity providers from which FX markets are actually created and order flow is handled for the entire world being based in London.

Yes indeed, the US dollar is a global standard for trade in all sectors of industry, across all international settlements and for creating comparisons and performance statistics. Effectively the US dollar is the measure by which to calculate absolutely everything, everywhere, yet the British pound remains the highest valued currency.

Dissenters have amassed ever since the United Kingdom’s electorate took to the polling booths and took the step that will future proof the British economy entirely by voting to leave the European Union.

The British pound dived in value to a 31 year low immediately – but still remained higher in value than any other currency.

It is too easy to consider the difference in currency values on face value and to look at the superficial soundbites that dominate mainstream market analyses that assess vanilla currency values without looking at what is actually behind these movements.

Taking a close look beneath the surface reveals a totally different set of circumstances and shows why the Pound is heading for a massive long term rise, and will be the best of the lot by far.

Confidence in British business is high – stock in FTSE 100 listed companies has not reached such lofty heights since 1986, this being an indication of the confidence that investors (some of which are majority shareholders) have in British business once the nation is freed from the unproductive burden of sponsoring the European Union to the tune of several billion per year, and being exposed to European Central Bank debt created by its policy of handing out free money to bankrupt countries over and over again and selling its debt back to the taxpayer numerous times.

This does not happen in highly productive Britain, whose FinTech and financial sectors dominate the world. London’s financial sector employs just 0.0009% of Europe’s workforce, yet is responsible for 19% of all tax receipts. Now that is the sign of efficiency.

So, if house prices are high and confidence in British firms’ future performance and ability to negotiate free trade agreements globally with critical regions in Asia, North America and Australia – all buoyant modern economies with highly developed financial markets sectors unlike Europe which is steeped in socialism, debt and dependency, and international venture capital investors are plowing money into the prowess of the British business minds, why is the pound low?

It is purely down to negotiating liquidity agreements. An independent Britain means new negotiations need to be made, thus a downturn in the value of the pound is inevitable due to liquidity shortages. Not lack of confidence, or the negative thought that the United Kingdom needs Brussels, but simply liquidity shortages.

When Theresa May’s government has completed the execution of Article 50 and Britain becomes completely independent, and the liquidity agreements with the banks across the world have been set in place, we can watch the Pound rocket in value.

Brussels hampers trade agreements, and dictates which EU member state can do business with which region overseas, usually looking after its own interests and restricting access to the important markets of the Far East and North America.

Risk aversion by banks offering liquidity and the issue of counterparty credit risk have also played a significant part in this, and will continue to do so.

capture
Source: FinancialExpress

The difficulty is that London’s banks measure the capitalization of firms that they extend credit to in US dollars and Euros only, not in British pounds.

The Bank for International Settlements which is owned by central banks and whose primary function is to foster international monetary and financial cooperation as well as serving as an actual bank for central banks only uses three currencies as a reference point for global liquidity, and the British pound is not one of them, therefore the methods of measuring pound liquidity are not transparent at all.

The term “global liquidity” is used by the Bank for International Settlements to mean the ease of financing in global financial markets.

Credit is among the key indicators of global liquidity and the focus of the global liquidity indicators constructed by the BIS (Domanski et al (2011). Global liquidity in general and credit in particular influence the build-up of financial system vulnerabilities in the form of asset price inflation, leverage, or maturity or funding mismatches.

The BIS constructs three indicators of global liquidity: banks’ international claims, banks’ total claims on the private non-financial sector, and total credit by currency of denomination. These indicators draw on national data and BIS international banking and financial statistics, but incorporate assumptions and estimations by BIS
statisticians, however these are conducted in Yen, Euro and US Dollar, with the Pound nowhere to be seen.

The Pound Flash Crash

When the British Pound took a tumble in value as a result of the ‘Flash Crash’ in early October, once again the European Commission as well as the pro-EU brigade in British media began to once again assume that Britain’s top quality sovereign currency was floundering because Britain dared to leave the European Union.

Fortunately the astute business leaders of the Square Mile know that this is not the case, and had examined possible reasons closely.

Immediate finger-pointing centred on the likelihood of a “fat-finger” trade, where someone typed the wrong number in an order, which is not unheard of.Another theory is that it was a glitch in an algorithm used to automate trades — along the lines of the 2010 US stock market “flash crash” or the 2014 spike in US Treasuries.

capture-3
Liquidity benchmarks are measured in EUR, JPY and USD by the Bank for International Settlements – Result: Lack of transparency with regard to interbank GBP liquidity

If it was a fat finger, then the market convention is that the counterparties will agree to wipe it out and it will be scrubbed from the records within hours. The fact that has not happened yet makes a fat finger less likely, but watch this space.

One day after its occurrence, some pundits considered that it could have been timed to take advantage of low liquidity however there is no proof that it was deliberate, but if someone wanted to try moving the market sharply, then the time that it occurred would have suited such an action perfectly with Wall Street finishing its working day, the Asia Pacific region well into the early hours of the mornin and Australia already into its next working day with Singapore’s morning having commenced. Singapore is Asia’s largest center for institutional and interbank FX.

capture-2

Other theories consider that it was connected to options expiries because Friday is the day forex options tend to expire and this can cause extreme trading moves if the writers of those options — banks — suddenly need to hedge themselves against a big drop in a currency.

Based on data from the DTCC trade depository, the biggest group of expiring sterling-dollar options was at the $1.25 level, with a notional $1.23bn outstanding. In other words, the sudden slide in the pound below $1.25 triggered a scramble by writers of options to sell the pound and protect themselves from losses.

If, as some other analysts may believe, it was due to stop-loss orders below $1.26 then that would be a very over-reaching market explaination which covers many sharp moves with no obvious cause

Investors leave orders with their banks to reduce or close out their positions at pre-agreed levels — to mitigate the risk of a sharp move when they are, say, asleep. The risk is that a build-up of orders at the same level exacerbates a price move when they are all triggered simultaneously.

Wouldn’t it be an interesting thing to do now, to place a very long pound trade and then look back in one year’s time and reminisce about a circumstance that is never likely to happen again.

Read this next

Inside View

Stable Scandinavia: Nordic currencies going for absolute gold. We get the inside view

Following a Bloomberg report that singled out Nordic currencies as ones to watch this year, FinanceFeeds took a look within.

Industry News

Bureaucratic FX industry stifler Gary Gensler tipped as Joe Biden’s new SEC chair

During his term, the CFTC created 68 new rules, orders and guidance’s and extended its regulatory reach to encompass not only exchange-traded derivatives but also the far larger OTC markets as well. Will he cosy up to ESMA?

Industry News

DriveWealth buys US floor trading firm

30% of the DriveWealth’s orders in Q4 2020 were placed outside of normal trading hours

Industry News

The Daily Telegraph calls time on Spread Betting and CFDs

Questor acknowledges that it has openly tipped the shares of CMC Markets in the past, but also that the shares have risen by 269% since then and that selling after such a run would be “prudent”

Inside View

SE Asia’s derivatives trading explosion should make all FX brokers look long and hard

SE Asia has been a region of importance for many years. FX brokers went in en masse, some got a bloody nose, some sold to Chinese firms. Meanwhile, exchange traded contracts for retail clients are at unprecedented highs and sustainable. Going on-exchange and multi-asset is the future for firms wanting to approach Asia.

Opinion

How can FX relationship managers and directors maintain relationships in a Corona world? – Op Ed

“The marketplace is cram packed with FX firms vying for business and the only difference is how their personnel approach and handle the clients” says Meir Velenski

Opinion

How to protect your corporate FX exposure from British pound volatility

The corporate foreign exchange impact from the UK’s divorce from the EU can be mitigated.

Industry News

Bank of Russia joins Global FX Code

We take a look at the ethos and origins of the Global FX Code, and how Russia’s FX brokers may well align with those of the West as a result of the Russian Central Bank’s position

Industry News

The UK chancellor plans a second “Big Bang” for London’s markets

Currently, the chancellor’s vision seems to be long on promise and short on substance