Hong Kong’s SFC voices concerns about “nominees” and “warehousing” arrangements

Maria Nikolova

The regulator reminds intermediaries to be mindful of red flags indicating potential improper activities, which are often facilitated by “nominees” and “warehousing” arrangements.

Hong Kong’s Securities and Futures Commission (SFC) has earlier today published a circular to intermediaries voicing its concerns about the growing use of “nominees” and “warehousing” arrangements, which often facilitate corporate misconduct.

The SFC has observed cases where nominee clients took instructions from “masterminds”, and participated in activities to manipulate share prices or voting results in general meetings of listed companies, or to conceal the actual shareholding in a listed company to evade regulatory requirements.

The regulator warns intermediaries that they should be wary of potential red flags and critically review and enhance their systems and controls for the purpose of complying with related legal and regulatory requirements.

For instance, Paragraph 5.4 of the Code of Conduct, requires intermediaries to be satisfied on reasonable grounds about (i) the identity, address and contact details of (a) the person or entity ultimately responsible for originating the instruction in relation to a transaction; and (b) the person or entity that stands to gain the commercial or economic benefit of the transaction and / or bear its commercial or economic risk; and (ii) the instruction given by the person or entity referred to in (i).

Intermediaries are advised to be vigilant in looking out for potential red flags that may suggest use of “nominee” and “warehousing” arrangements for illegitimate purposes. For example, suspicions are likely to be triggered when:

  • clients effect transactions involving large amounts of funds that are not commensurate with their financial profiles;
  • clients only transact in one or two stocks over an extended period. The circumstances would be more suspicious if the clients are walk-in clients, opening an account to effect a single transaction involving a large sum of money;
  • there is a large number of seemingly unrelated clients having authorised the same third party (who is not a licensed representative or registered individual of the intermediary) to operate their accounts;
  • there is a large number of seemingly unrelated clients that share the same trading and settlement patterns (for example, investing in same stocks) or the same correspondence address;
  • there are frequent and large fund transfers to and from third parties absent a credible commercial rationale or explanation; and
  • clients transfer a large quantity of stock (representing a sizeable portion of the typical daily turnover of the stock on the stock exchange) to and from third parties by way of bought and sold notes which do not appear to have been concluded on a normal commercial basis (for example, the executed price is substantially below the prevailing market price or the stock has been transferred to the client unaccompanied by any payment).

The regulator expects intermediaries to meet certain standards. They should take reasonable steps to establish the true and full identify of each client and the beneficial owner. Intermediaries are also expected to implement proper controls and approval procedures for the opening of third party operated accounts. Furthermore, they are expected to make payments directly to their clients and discourage third party payments.

Regarding third-party fund deposits, the SFC says intermediaries should take all reasonable steps to tighten their controls to monitor third party fund deposits. They are expected to inquire about and document the reasons for the deposits and the relationship between the client and the third party.

Intermediaries should also implement proper transaction monitoring procedures and pay special attention to transactions which may be indicative of potential illegal or manipulative activities.

The Intermediaries Supervision Department is set to continue to look for signs that may suggest dubious “nominee” and “warehousing” arrangements in the course of the supervisory reviews (covering both onsite inspections as well as offsite monitoring work). All material issues and deficiencies identified as well as Manager in Charge responsibilities in this regard will be investigated. These will include situations where there is reason to suspect that intermediaries and their senior management have knowingly facilitated such arrangements as well as situations where it appears that they have failed to detect and act on any red flags, including inadequate systems and controls.

The SFC says it will not hesitate to initiate criminal or other proceedings and impose disciplinary penalties where it establishes any failings on the part of intermediaries, including suspension or revocation of a licence or a registration, as well as fines on intermediaries and senior management.

Read this next

Retail FX

Italian watchdog red flags Olympus Brokers, UnicoFX and Allfina Group

Italy’s Commissione Nazionale per le Società e la Borsa (CONSOB) has shut down new websites in an ongoing clampdown against firms it accuses of illegally promoting investment products in the country.

Retail FX

XTB revenues hits zł1.45 billion in 2022, Q4 earnings disappoint

Poland-based Forex and CFDs broker, XTB has reported its final results for Q4 of 2022 and the full fiscal year ending on December 31, 2022, showing one of its most successful corporate years.

Executive Moves

Lirunex Limited recruits Waleed Salah as head of MENA sales

Maldives-based brokerage firm Lirunex Limited has secured the services of Waleed Salah, who joined the company in the role of its head of sales for the MENA region.

Executive Moves

Trading 212 parts ways with co-founder Borislav Nedialkov

Trading 212 has a void to fill at its FCA-regulated business in London, following the departure of two key players, Raj Somal and Borislav Nedialkov.

Digital Assets

Binance acquires troubled crypto exchange GOPAX

Binance, the world’s largest digital asset trading platform, has reportedly acquired a majority stake in the troubled South Korea-based cryptocurrency exchange GOPAX.

Digital Assets

Kraken exits Middle East, closes UAE office

Digital currency exchange Kraken will close down its operations in Abu Dhabi, UAE and lay off the majority of its team focused on the Middle East and North Africa.

Industry News

CFTC comments on ION Cleared Derivatives issues after Russian-linked hack

“The ongoing issue is impacting some clearing members’ ability to provide the CFTC with timely and accurate data. As this incident unfolded, it became clear that the submission of data that is required by registrants will be delayed until the trading issues are resolved.”

Industry News

FCA took down 14 times more misleading ads in 2022 thanks to technology

The FCA has made significant improvements to the digital tools it uses to find problem firms and misleading adverts. These improvements have enabled it to work through a much larger number of cases compared with 2021.

Executive Moves

HKEX appoints ex-Goldman Sachs Matthew Cheong to lead platform’s focus on derivatives

“He has worked for a number of the world’s leading investment banks and his experience will be invaluable to HKEX as we continue to enhance our derivatives product offerings and build on our innovative and robust platform business, connecting capital with opportunities.”

<