NYSE responds to allegations in HFT case

Maria Nikolova

NYSE is among the Exchanges accused of selling certain services to high-frequency trading firms, which then used those services to engage in allegedly manipulative trading schemes at the plaintiffs’ expense.

Less than a fortnight after Judge Jesse M. Furman of the New York Sourhern District Court dashed an attempt by major US stock exchanges to dismiss a market manipulation case against them, New York Stock Exchange LLC, NYSE Arca, Inc., and Chicago Stock Exchange, Inc. (collectively, “NYSE”) filed their response to the allegations against them.

The plaintiffs – several investment funds – bring claims against several stock exchanges, including NYSE, under Section 10(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, 15 U.S.C. § 78j(b). In brief, the plaintiffs allege that the Exchanges sold certain services to high-frequency trading (HFT) firms, which then used those services to engage in allegedly manipulative trading schemes at the plaintiffs’ expense.

In a document filed on July 25, 2019, and seen by FinanceFeeds, NYSE outlines 21 affirmative defenses in response to the plaintiffs’ complaint.

According to NYSE, the paintiffs fail to state a claim upon which relief may be granted against the Exchange.

Further, NYSE argues that the plaintiffs’ claims are barred, in whole or in part, by the applicable statute of limitations and repose.

Also, according to NYSE, the plaintiffs’ claims are barred, in whole or in part, to the extent they failed to take steps to mitigate their alleged damages, including that the plaintiffs continued to trade on the Exchanges’ markets after allegedly learning of the supposed manipulation.

NYSE also argues that the plaintiffs’ claims are barred because NYSE is absolutely immune from private damages suits, such as this one, challenging conduct that is undertaken in connection with the discharge of its regulatory responsibilities as a self-regulatory organization under the Exchange Act.

Moreover, NYSE is informed and believes, and on that basis alleges, that if and to the extent that its descriptions of the challenged products and services are determined to have contained false or misleading statements (which NYSE denies), the plaintiffs either knew or should have known about the matters alleged in the Second Consolidated and Amended Complaint, and their own negligence or other fault proximately contributed to the injuries allegedly suffered by Plaintiffs from the purchase and sale of stocks on NYSE exchanges, and bars any recovery to the extent thereof.

NYSE expressly denies that it engaged in any unlawful conduct and states that all or part of the damages alleged in the Second Consolidated and Amended Complaint, if they occurred, were caused by independent, intervening, and/or superseding events beyond NYSE’s control and unrelated to NYSE’s conduct, and/or by the policies, practices, acts, or omissions of independent persons or entities for whose conduct NYSE is not legally responsible.

The plaintiffs’ alleged damages, if any, are therefore not recoverable from NYSE, the Exchange says. In the alternative, any damages that Plaintiffs might be entitled to recover against NYSE, if any, must be reduced to the extent that such damages are attributable to the intervening acts and/or omissions of persons or entities other than NYSE.

NYSE also says that the plaintiffs’ claims against NYSE are barred in whole or in part by their own actions, omissions, and/or negligence.

NYSE denies liability and requests judgment dismissing the Second Consolidated Amended Complaint with prejudice and awarding NYSE its costs of suit, including attorneys’ fees, incurred in defending this action.

Read this next

Opinion

The FX Algo Wheel, is it wheels up and ready to take flight?

by David Catterick, Sales Director, BidFX Australia

Retail FX

eToro users now can trade underlying Italian stocks

Israeli social trading and multi-asset brokerage company eToro has expanded its service offering and trading products by incorporating new markets, namely Italian stocks listed at underlying exchanges.

Digital Assets

BlackRock bets on crypto bank Silvergate despite drastic fall

BlackRock, the world’s largest asset manager, has increased its stake in Silvergate Bank, a crypto-friendly lender that counts major crypto exchanges like Coinbase and Kraken as clients.

Opinion

A viewpoint from Anatoly Crachilov, CEO and Founding Partner at Nickel Digital, on SEC regulation of the digital asset sector

The SEC’s latest episode comes across as more of a PR performance rather than an act of investor protection.

Digital Assets

Tether denies receiving any loans from Celsius, the opposite is true

World’s largest stablecoin issuer, Tether dismissed reports suggesting that it received a $2 billion loan from the bankrupt cryptocurrency lender Celsius.

Institutional FX

Cboe FX volume makes strong rebound in January

Cboe’s institutional spot FX platform today announced its trading volume for the month ending January 2023, which marks a mild rebound after a steep fall in December.

Uncategorized

XS.com appoints Exness alumni Mohamad Ibrahim as CEO

XS.com, the multi-regulated financial services provider, has appointed Mohamad Ibrahim as the group’s newest chief executive officer (CEO).

Technology

B2Broker Integrates Match-Trader Solution to Expands Its White Label Liquidity Offering

A global provider of technology and liquidity for the FX and cryptocurrency markets, B2Broker recently announced the extension of its white label liquidity offering by merging with Match-Trader.

Digital Assets

UK launches open consultation to regulate crypto exchanges, custody, and lending

The government’s proposed measures have been informed by recent market events – including the failure of FTX – which reinforce the case for effective regulation and sector engagement.

<