SEC opposes attempt by Blockvest to delay proceedings

Maria Nikolova

The Securities and Exchange Commission argues against a request by Blockvest and its founder Reginald Buddy Ringgold, III to continue the proceedings.

More than a year after the United States Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) obtained a Court order halting ongoing pre-ICO sales by Blockvest LLC and its founder, Reginald Buddy Ringgold, III, the proceedings go on at the US District Court for the Southern District of California and the regulator tries to press ahead with its action.

The latest Court filings indicate that whereas the defendants are trying to continue the proceedings, the SEC is trying to secure the Court’s approval of its motion for summary judgment against the defendants.

On January 24, 2020, the SEC filed its motion for summary judgment. Now, a month later—after the deadline for any opposition has expired – Blockvest and Ringgold have filed an ex parte application for an indefinite continuance of these proceedings. According to the SEC, the application is deficient and baseless under both this District’s rules and Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 56(d).

The SEC notes that the defendants have flouted the procedural rules. In addition to serving their application after the opposition deadline, Defendants failed to give the SEC advance notice of the application or file any affidavit articulating why notice was not required.

The regulator argues that the defendants also have not provided a sufficient basis to delay consideration of the SEC’s summary judgment motion under the standard set forth in Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 56(d). The defendants contend that they need additional time to review discovery and to conduct further discovery, but their lack of evidence is a failure of their own making, the SEC says.

The discovery period in this matter lasted roughly seven months, during which time the SEC produced thousands of pages of documents (at least eight months ago) and responded to the defendants’ written discovery requests (six months ago). The defendants also had the opportunity (but failed) to attend numerous depositions of Blockvest investors and employees taken by the SEC, the regulator points out. The defendants do not specify what additional discovery would be necessary, nor how long it would take. Further, the defendants claim that they need an unspecified additional time to retain counsel to assist with their defense, but their prior counsel withdrew over a year ago which means that they have had ample opportunity to obtain counsel since then, but have simply failed to do so.

In summary, the SEC argues that the Court should proceed to consider the SEC’s motion for summary judgment and treat th defendants as having failed to oppose it.

The SEC’s complaint alleges that Blockvest falsely claimed its ICO and its affiliates had regulatory approval from various agencies. The complaint further says that Blockvest and Ringgold, who also goes by the name Rasool Abdul Rahim El, were using the SEC seal without permission, thus committing a violation of federal law. Ringgold promoted the ICO with a fake agency he created called the “Blockchain Exchange Commission,” using a graphic similar to the SEC’s seal and the same address as SEC headquarters.

Blockvest and Ringgold continued their fraudulent conduct even after the National Futures Association (NFA) sent them a cease-and-desist letter to stop them from using the NFA’s seal and from making false claims about their status with that organization.

The SEC’s complaint charges Blockvest and Ringgold with violating the antifraud and securities registration provisions of the federal securities laws. The regulator seeks injunctions, return of ill-gotten gains plus interest and penalties, and a bar against Ringgold to prohibit him from participating in offering any securities, including digital securities, in the future or making misleading statements about regulatory approval.

Read this next

Digital Assets

Point72 invests $77.5 million in Bitcoin, Morgan Stanley holds $269.9 million

Point72, the $34 billion hedge fund owned by billionaire and New York Mets owner Steven Cohen, held $77.5 million in the Fidelity Wise Origin Bitcoin Fund (FBTC) at the end of the first quarter, according to a recent filing.

Digital Assets

Binance claims Nigerian officials sought $150 million bribe

A Nigerian court has ruled that Tigran Gambaryan, a Binance executive detained on charges of tax evasion and money laundering, can stand trial on behalf of the world’s largest cryptocurrency exchange.

Digital Assets

Kraken reviews Tether listing in Europe ahead of MiCA adoption

Cryptocurrency exchange Kraken is “actively reviewing” whether to delist the stablecoin Tether (USDT) from its European platform, according to a report by Bloomberg.


Discover How MoonBag Coin Presale Stacks Up Against Dogecoin & Litecoin

Discover how the MoonBag Coin presale compares to Dogecoin and Litecoin, with unique features, a robust presale structure, and new opportunities in 2024.

Fundamental Analysis, Market News, Tech and Fundamental

Global FX Market Summary: Federal Reserve Policy, USD, May 17 ,2024

Overall, both the Federal Reserve’s policy and the US dollar’s outlook are shrouded in some degree of uncertainty.

Market News, Tech and Fundamental, Technical Analysis

Ethereum Technical Analysis Report 17 May, 2024

Ethereum cryptocurrency can be expected to rise further toward the next resistance level 3200.00, which is the top of the previous impulse wave i.

Digital Assets

Hong Kong adopts digital yuan payments through Chinese banks

Hong Kong has launched a pilot program enabling digital yuan payments through major Chinese banks, marking the first instance of China’s digital currency project being deployed outside the mainland.

Retail FX

Saxo Bank increases client assets five-fold to $116 billion

Copenhagen-based broker Saxo Bank has achieved a major milestone, surpassing $116 billion (DKK 800 billion) in client assets.

Inside View

ISDA says US Basel III “endgame” to heighten market risk capital

ISDA further explained that, by requiring banks to hold additional capital that is misaligned with levels of risk, the proposal would significantly reduce capital market access for US end users and businesses, restrict the ability of businesses to hedge exposures to changes in commodity prices, and increase the cost of everyday consumer goods, including food and gasoline.