UK Govt brushes off questions about FCA's proposals to ban crypto investment products - FinanceFeeds

UK Govt brushes off questions about FCA’s proposals to ban crypto investment products

Maria Nikolova

As questions about the impact of the proposed ban grow in volume, John Glen stresses that the FCA is operationally independent from government.

For more than a year, the UK Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) has been mulling rules concerning cryptoasset-related activities. These efforts have led to, inter alia, the launch of the Cryptoasset Taskforce, as well as a set of consultations about the offering of cryptoasset-based products and the requirements for companies that offer crypto-based services.

Judging from the latest comments made by John Glen, Economic Secretary to the Treasury, the UK Government is not quite concerned about the issues related to the cryptoasset sector nor about the developments around the FCA consultations.

On October 21, 2019, John Glen replied to a series of questions related to cryptocurrencies, with most of them about the effects of the proposed ban on the offering of crypto-based investment products to retail investors.

Here is one of these questions:

“To ask the Chancellor of the Exchequer, what assessment he has made of the effect of the Financial Conduct Authority’s proposed ban of cryptoasset investment products for retail investors on (a) Revolut and (b) other challenger banks that offer products linked to cryptoassets”.

The answer by John Glen to all of the questions was uniform:

“The Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) made a commitment to consult on the potential prohibition of the sale to retail consumers of derivatives referencing certain types of cryptoassets in the final report of the Cryptoasset Taskforce, comprised of HM Treasury, the Bank of England and the Financial Conduct Authority, in October 2018.

The final decision on this consultation is a matter for the Financial Conduct Authority (FCA), which is operationally independent from government.

The government continues to endorse the approach set out in that the Cryptoasset Taskforce report as the right way to facilitate innovation while protecting consumers and firms.”

John Glen avoided replying to questions about the number of responses to the FCA’s consultation restricting the sale to retail clients of investment products that reference cryptoassets and the number of formal complaints the FCA has received from consumers in relation to the (a) sale and (b) distribution of Exchange Traded Notes that reference cryptoassets.

Let’s recall that, when the FCA launched its consultation it said it believed that retail consumers cannot reliably assess the value and risks of derivatives (contracts for difference, futures and options) and exchange traded notes (ETNs) that reference certain cryptoassets. This is due to the:

  • inherent nature of the underlying assets, which have no reliable basis for valuation;
  • prevalence of market abuse and financial crime (including cyberthefts from cryptoasset platforms) in the secondary market for cryptoassets;
  • extreme volatility in cryptoasset prices movements;
  • inadequate understanding by retail consumers of cryptoassets and the lack of a clear investment need for investment products referencing them.

The regulator said back then it estimates a ban could reduce harm by £75m to £234.3m a year for retail investors.

Read this next

Industry News

Admiral Markets doubled net trading income in 2020

The Forex-and CFD-focused company, which was founded 20 years ago, now aims to onboard 10 million clients by 2030.

Industry News

SEC wages war against ‘meme stocks’, suspends 22 securities

These 22 securities were being promoted on social media with the only purpose of inflating the price. The typical pump and dump scheme now being perpetrated on social media on a mass scale.

Opinion

Missing the Point over GameStop

Yesterday we saw further volatile trading in GameStop shares. Whether this is the start of another rally or just day traders ‘shaking the tree’, time will tell. But what is clear is that this new trading type won’t just go away. 

Industry News

Bitpay to pay up: $507,375 for 2,102 violations of sanctions programs

OFAC determined that BitPay failed to exercise due caution and did not voluntarily disclose the 2,102 sanctions violations. BitPay agreed to pay $507,375 to settle with the Treasury Department.

Industry News

Whistleblower Awards: SEC Crosses $750 million in awards since 2012

While “crime never pays” is far from being absolute truth, “no one likes a tattletale” has completely lost its meaning in the United States.

Industry News

Aghaz launches values-based trading in the US, starting with Islamic Finance

Aghaz is targeting U.S.-based Muslim consumers, but will soon offer custom-values products for anyone wishing to invest based on their personal values like climate change or equal rights.

Industry News

Ron Kalifa fights for fintech sector in the wake of Brexit

In 2020, investment into UK fintech stood at $4.1 billion in 2020, which is more than the next 4 European countries combined.

Inside View

How is Michael Bolton supposed to live without… PFOF?

Mullet-clad, leather jacket toting 1980s soft rock crooner Michael Bolton sings about the heartbreak Payment For Order Flow (PFOF) can cause FX liquidity takers

Inside View

Goldman Sachs CEO David Solomon is right!

Working from home should absolutely not be the way forward, and companies closing their office space to make working from home a permanent feature are making a big mistake.