US govt chooses not to provide all trading details in FX manipulation case

Maria Nikolova

In a letter to Judge Berman, the US government argues that “the trading itself was not the crime nor is it an element of the charged crime. The trading is evidence that the crime occurred”.

The conflict over evidentiary details in the case brought by the United States Government against three members of the so-called “FX Cartel” or “FX Mafia” continues. It has been apparent that neither of the parties in the case, captioned USA v. Usher et al (1:17-cr-00019), is eager to go through the huge amount of data associated with the allegedly collusive trading that went on for nearly five years.

The Defendants in this case: Richard Usher, Rohan Ramchandani, and Christopher Ashton, are accused of having conspired to manipulate the FX market by “coordinating their bidding, offering, and trading” at “certain times.”

In a letter to Judge Berman at the New York Southern District Court, dated September 12, 2017, the US Government stated its arguments not to provide trading data detail on any particular episode of collusive trading alleged to have occurred during the five-year period of the conspiracy. The letter is in response to Defendants’ request from last week about such details being included in a bill of particulars.

The US Government requests the Court to reject the Defendants’ requests for a bill of particulars and for the Government to provide specificity for all of the many thousands of episodes of collusive trading that took place during the entire five-year run of the conspiracy, whether or not those episodes will be discussed at trial, as well as for the Government to provide the specifics on a much earlier timetable.

A bill of particulars is seen as unwarranted by the Government because the Indictment provides factual background and a clear statement of the alleged collusive agreement.

The Government alleges that the conspirators carried out that agreement, in part, by coordinating their currency trading. However, it adds that: “the trading itself was not the crime nor is it an element of the charged crime”.

“The trading is evidence that the crime occurred, just as chat transcripts, emails, and recorded phone calls are”.

Even with no trading data, the combination of witness testimony, chat transcripts, emails, internal bank documents, and recorded phone calls should be sufficient, according to the Government, as evidence that the collusive agreement existed and trading in conformance therewith occurred.

“The Government chooses not to provide trading data detail on any particular episode of collusive trading”, the letter says.

The Government also notes the hefty volume of data in question. The alleged conspiracy in this case lasted approximately five years, during which the conspirators communicated together in an online chat room nearly all day, every day. The Government says it has not catalogued, and does not intend to catalogue, each of those thousands of collusive trading episodes. The Government adds that it will need to identify a small subset of representative episodes to be tried.

“Requiring the Government to specify “the episodes” (which is the same as “all episodes”) of collusive trading would likely take many months if not years to accomplish, to no one’s benefit”.

The Government argues that the timetable suggested by the Defendants is unachievable. In exchange, it proposes that:

  • Within two weeks of the Court’s Order, the Government will identify no more than 200 episodes involving alleged coordination of trading between the co-conspirators for potential use in the case-in-chief at trial. For each episode, the list will provide the date, Bates number of the associated chat or phone call that describes the episode, and the approximate time of each episode.
  • The Government will provide two updates to this list, on November 3, 2017, and December 15, 2017.
  • The Parties will exchange initial trial exhibit lists for case-in-chief evidence, either two weeks after the Court provides its opinion and order on dispositive motions or March 1, 2018, whichever is earlier, and final trial exhibit lists for case-in-chief evidence on May 3, 2018.

The trial is scheduled for June 4, 2018.

Usher, former Head of G11 FX Trading-UK at an affiliate of Royal Bank of Scotland plc, as well as former Managing Director at an affiliate of JPMorgan Chase & Co., Ramchandani, former Managing Director and head of G10 FX spot trading at an affiliate of Citicorp, and Ashton, former Head of Spot FX at an affiliate of Barclays PLC, have pleaded not guilty.

Read this next

Retail FX

Malaysia regulator exposes OctaFX clone, shady FB profiles

Malaysia’s financial regulator today warned online investors about the risks of following investment tips made on social-media platforms.

Digital Assets

Crypto trading volume spikes at Swiss bourse amid FTX collapse

The shockwaves from the historic collapse of Sam Bankman-Fried’s crypto empire are still being felt across the industry, but some trading venues are actually doing better because of it.

Executive Moves

CMC Markets adds Camilla Boldracchi to institutional sales

UK’s biggest spread better, CMC Markets has promoted Camilla Boldracchi to take on an expanded role within its institutional sales desk.

Institutional FX

FXSpotStream reports $1.48 trillion in monthly volume for November

FXSpotStream’s trading venue, the aggregator service of LiquidityMatch LLC, reported its operational metrics for November 2022, which moved higher on a yearly basis but reflected weak performance across executed trade volumes when weighed against the figures of the prior month.

Retail FX

Interactive Brokers’ client activity drops 30% YoY

Interactive Brokers LLC (NASDAQ:IBKR) saw 1.95 million daily average revenue trades, or DARTS, in November 2022 compared to 1.96 million transactions in the prior month.

Digital Assets

The rise of Crypto ETPs in traditional exchanges as crypto winter deepens

Institutional investors are increasingly looking at traditional regulated exchanges as their first route into digital assets amid market turmoil caused by the crypto winter and the collapse of several big names within the space, including FTX. Acuiti and Eurex surveyed 191 buy and sell-side firms on their views of the digital assets markets in order […]

Digital Assets

TP ICAP’s crypto arm receives FCA’s go-ahead

UK interdealer broker TP ICAP has received a regulatory go-ahead to launch its cryptocurrency services in the UK. The bid shows that the recent collapse of FTX exchange has done little to damp the interest of big names in running their own crypto business.

Industry News

Coin Signals founder to pay $2,847,743 after prison sentence over crypto Ponzi scam

The U. S. District Court for the Southern District of New York has ordered Jeremy Spence, founder of Coin Signals, to pay $2,847,743 in restitution to victims of a fraudulent virtual currency scheme.

Digital Assets

CME Group goes DeFi: Reference rates and real-time indices of Aave, Curve, Synthetix

“These rates are designed to provide traders, institutions and other users transparency and price discovery across a much broader range of tokens, allowing them to confidently and more accurately value cryptocurrency sector specific portfolios and manage price risk around various blockchain-based projects.”