Westpac’s fine over $12b pre-hedging trade in Australia puts regulators under spotlight

Rick Steves

“Currently, there’s no global guidance on this, emphasizing the existence of a grey area and underscoring the need for better regulatory oversight to uphold market integrity and safeguard investor interests.”

The Federal Court of Australia has found Westpac Banking Corporation guilty of engaging in unconscionable conduct during a major financial transaction in October 2016. This involved a $12 billion interest rate swap, the largest transaction of its kind in the history of the Australian financial market.

Westpac is ordered to pay a $1.8 million penalty, the highest possible for this case, along with $8 million to cover the Australian Securities and Investments Commission’s (ASIC) litigation and investigation costs.

The issue arose when Westpac, in dealing with a Consortium consisting of AustralianSuper and IFM entities, engaged in pre-hedging before executing an interest rate swap. This swap was crucial for managing the interest rate risk linked to the Consortium’s purchase of a majority stake in Ausgrid from the NSW Government.

The draws attention to the intricate and somewhat unclear nature of practices like pre-hedging and pre-close calls in the financial industry. These methods allow investors who have access to non-public information to strategically execute trades. By doing so, they can anticipate and respond to potential market movements, thus hedging their risks. This advantage adds a level of opacity to market operations and may lead to market shifts that are detrimental to clients and, in certain instances, may resemble insider trading due to the informational advantage they confer.

There is, however, a lack of uniform global guidelines on these practices which require the urgent need for more robust regulatory oversight in this domain.

“Appropriate conduct for pre-hedging is an issue of global significance”

ASIC Deputy Chair Sarah Court said: “This is a significant outcome which assists to clarify expectations regarding pre-hedging, particularly around disclosure and consent where the pre-hedging can have a detrimental impact on the counterparty to the transaction. Appropriate conduct for pre-hedging is an issue of global significance. In this case, Westpac’s behavior was unconscionable and exposed its client to significant risk. Westpac’s conduct was also in stark contrast with several other banks. We share the Court’s concern regarding the maximum penalty available in relation to the conduct, and note that had Westpac engaged in similar conduct today the maximum available penalty would have been significantly higher.”

The court identified Westpac’s conduct as unconscionable because it was aware of the Consortium’s concerns about pre-hedging, which could adversely impact the swap transaction price. Yet, Westpac proceeded with significant pre-hedging trades without obtaining client consent or providing full disclosure.

Westpac profited $20.7 million

Westpac’s derivatives trading desk gained a profit of approximately $20.7 million from this transaction, raising further questions about its conduct. The court also noted Westpac’s failure to manage conflicts of interest adequately and to ensure efficient, honest, and fair service to the Consortium.

A decision is pending on whether Westpac will be required to undergo a compliance program with an independent review of its pre-hedging practices and conflict of interest management.

Background information reveals that ASIC’s original allegations against Westpac included insider trading, unconscionable conduct, and breaches of obligations as a financial services licensee. This case has highlighted the evolution of civil penalties since 2016, with current penalties for similar misconduct now significantly higher.

ASIC emphasizes that pre-hedging practices are of global concern, and the organization is actively involved in addressing these issues with the International Organisation of Securities Commissions (IOSCO).

No global guidance on pre-hedging and pre-close calls

“The parallels between pre-hedging and pre-close calls highlight a complex and somewhat ambiguous area within the industry,” said Matt Smith, CEO of SteelEye, a market surveillance solution provider.

“These practices enable investors with access to non-public information to strategically position trades, anticipating specific market moves to hedge their risks, giving them an advantage and adding a layer of opaqueness to the market. In many cases, this can lead to market shifts against clients and, in certain cases, raise concerns resembling insider trading.

“Currently, there’s no global guidance on this, emphasizing the existence of a grey area and underscoring the need for better regulatory oversight to uphold market integrity and safeguard investor interests.”

  • Read this next

    Institutional FX

    Cboe to launch MSCI-based options and volatility indices

    “We are excited to expand our Cboe-MSCI toolkit with additional index options and volatility indices – an enhancement that will not only broaden our customers’ product choice, but also enrich the ways they interact with and analyze the global markets.”

    Fintech

    Traxys taps Quantifi for risk management in commodities trading

    “We wanted to take a more sophisticated approach to risk management and have a consolidated view of risk exposures across our global operating model. Quantifi was our preferred choice as it has a track record of success in the commodities markets.”

    Digital Assets

    Startale Labs Secures Funding for Web3 Expansion

    Startale Labs, a leader in Japan’s Web3 development, including Astar Network and Startale Web3 Cloud, has raised an additional $3.5m from UOB Venture Management and Samsung Next. This seed extension round boosts their total seed funding to $7m, following a $3.5m investment from Sony Network Communications in June 2023.

    Retail FX

    XS.com acquires South African broker Ubutyebi Financial Services

    XS.com, the multi-regulated financial services provider, has made a strategic move to expand its presence in Africa by acquiring Ubutyebi Financial Services, a licensed Financial Service Provider (FSP) in South Africa regulated by the Financial Sector Conduct Authority (FSCA).

    Digital Assets

    Hong Kong advances legislation on stablecoins and crypto trading

    Hong Kong is moving forward with legislation to regulate stablecoins and crypto over-the-counter (OTC) trading in the latest effort to develop a legal framework to service the city’s digital-asset industry.

    Digital Assets

    Do Kwon to be extradited to US as South Korea request overturned

    Terraform Labs co-founder Do Kwon is set to be extradited to the United States to face fraud charges related to massive losses suffered by U.S. investors due to its algorithmic stablecoin collapse.

    Retail FX

    Prop firm Instant Funding pauses US accounts, citing ThinkMarkets ban

    Proprietary trading firm Instant Funding has become the latest retail platform to halt onboarding new US clients, citing a recent decision by their partner broker, ThinkMarkets.

    Retail FX

    Funded Trader and Alpha Capital switch to cTrader, Lark Funding to DXTrade

    Proprietary trading firms Lark Funding and Alpha Capital have both announced changes to their operations that mainly affect their business with US clients.

    Fintech

    Top 5 Most Reliable KYC Technology Providers

    The financial sector’s trade evolution has led to the emergence of several financial markets that provide excellent opportunities for wealth creation. However, it has also given rise to many fraudulent organisations that attempt to steal money from traders. KYC providers developed and offered KYC technology to combat criminal activity in the field of trading and investing.

    <