How will MiFID II affect YOUR brokerage? Who has to report, and where do you stand? – Live from Cyprus

Price quality, speed of execution, likelihood of execution, settlement size, information relating to execution venue and financial instrument traded. The amount and nature of the reported data must be published and be made available for public viewing on a quarterly basis, says Point Nine’s Andrea Peratitis

Yesterday morning, FinanceFeeds attended a briefing, along with several electronic trading industry executives representing brokerages, legal entities, hedge funds, management consultancies and institutional entities, in which the MiFID II post trade reporting procedure was explained by senior executives of post-trade execution, operation, processing and reporting company Point Nine.

As part of the symposium which was held in Limassol, Cyprus, the subject of post-trade reporting responsibility was covered by Andrea Peratitis, Head of Regulatory Reporting & Compliance at Point Nine.

In presenting the reporting requirements under the impending MiFID II directive, Ms. Peratitis explained that the categories that will be integral to the regulatory structure will include best execution, and that the directive targets investment firms and trading venues as well as liquidity providers and systematic internalizers that operate in any jurisdiction within the European Union.

With regard to investment firms of any type which execute client orders on European and third country execution venues, regulation under MiFID II will insist that trades are reported across the entirety of the execution thread, including from third country venues outside the European Union.

Ms Peratitis elaborated on this, informing delegates that qualitative data should be separated according to each class of financial instrument and that brokers must publish full post trade information on their sites on an annual basis.

“Regulated markets (RM), multilateral trading faciltiies (MTFs) or organized trading facilities (OTFs) all should report and publish post trade data according to execution venue reporting requirements” she explained.

MiFID II categorizes the difference between each type of trading venue, and on this basis, Ms Peratitis explained how these are distinguished according to MiFID II.

“In terms of the differences between MTFs, OTFs and systematic internalizers (SIs) in MiFID II, there are some important differntiating factors. MTFs are considered to be the same as regulated markets but without enhanced government requirements, whereas OTFs have a discretionary matching system where only non-equities cna be traded, and regulated and unregulated firms can trade on OTFs whereas MTFs are only available to regulated firms. A systematic internalizer represents a company which internalizes its trades (b-book – Ed). In the case of systematic internalizers, all types of OTC transactions can be performed and traded but only the clients of that investment firm can trade with that type of company” she said.

What data needs to be published?

MiFID II will require substantial granular data to be made publicly available by regulated entities.

Ms. Peratitis explained that these include “Price quality, speed of execution, likelihood of execution, settlement size, information relating to execution venue and financial instrument traded. The amount and nature of the reported data must be published and be made available for public viewing on a quarterly basis.”

Who needs to report?

Ms Peratitis detailed the type of entities that will need to report their trades publicly post implementation of MiFID II. “These will be categorized as financial counterparties, non financial counterparties exceeding the clearing threshold defined under EMIR 10, credit institutions, market operators and trading venues, central counterparties and third country firms providing investment services within EU.”

“The reporting obligation shall apply to transactions in financial instruments in respective of whether or not such transactions are carried out on an EU trading venue. For example, derivatives which are traded outside the EU where the underlying is traded on an EU trading venue will have to be reported” – Andrea Peratitis, Head of Regulatory Reporting & Compliance, Point Nine

Interestingly, as far as the types of derivatives that will have to be reported, all FX derivatives are included in the remit except for spot FX.

In order to make the reporting process organized and efficient, transaction reports made to national competent authorities (NCAs) can be done by the investment firm itself, via an Approved Reporting Mechanism (ARM) or trading venue if the firm is a member of a trading venue.

“When delegating reporting to ARM or trading venue there are three execmptions” explained Ms Peratitis. “The first is when a non-EEA firm only has one branch within the EU, then the reporting should go to the national reporting authority of the branch but if the company is a non EEA firm and has branches located within multiple jursidictions within the EU then the company should report to just one jurisdiction of its choice and report all transactions through that particular branch.”

The second exception applies to trading venues executing trades on their platforms by members that are not investment firms, and the third refers to home competent authorities which are authorities located outside of the EEA and thus outside the scope of MiFID II / MiFIR.

“The reporting obligation lies with the entity that is performing the trade execution, that being an OTF, MTF or SI. If trading is taking place from a particular venue and the counterparty is not an internalizer, then the obligation for reporting post trade goes to the seller. When buy side transacting is taking place off-venue and the counterparty is not regulated in the EU then the responsibility for reporting is with the buy side via an Approved Publication Arrangement (APA).

“In this case” concluded Ms Peratitis, “reporting is only to be done via an APA. Trades must be reported as close to real time as possible, and the current guidelines state that until January 2020 the timescale for reporting each trade should be within 15 minutes from execution of a transaction and after January 2020, it will be reduced to 5 minutes.”

Image: Andrea Peratitis of Point Nine explains all at the Alasia Hotel, Limassol, Cyprus

Read this next

Digital Assets

Paxos opens R&D center in Israel to focus on transaction signing and crypto custody security

“Paxos is looking to expand its team in Israel in 2023 and beyond, giving engineers the opportunity to work on cutting-edge financial products and shape the future of the global economy.”

Executive Moves

Stash appoints Liza Landsman as CEO to further grow investing app

Stash is an investing and banking app with over 2 million active subscribers. Its subscription plans start at just $3 a month, and offer a range of products including investing, banking, education, and advice.

Institutional FX

Invast Global ramps up its offering with 10 soft commodity CFDs

Sydney-based prime-of-prime provider Invast Global has expanded its offering with the addition of ten soft commodity CFDs, which increases their index and commodity CFD offering to 35 instruments.

Retail FX

FF Simple and Smart Trades says Goodbye to CySEC authorization

The Cyprus Securities and Exchange Commission (CySEC) confirmed that it has wholly withdrawn the Cyprus Investment Firm (CIF) licenses of FF Simple and Smart Trades Investment Services Ltd.

Crypto Insider

Shining the Light in Crypto’s Dark Places

Something changed in regulators’ minds after the November crash of the FTX crypto exchange.

Executive Moves

Financial Commission Adds Sam Low to Dispute Resolution Committee

The Financial Commission (FinaCom PLC), a dispute resolution service that caters to the financial services industry, has appointed Sam Low as the newest member of its Dispute Resolution Committee (DRC).

Digital Assets, Uncategorized

De-facto owner of Bithumb exchange arrested in South Korea

South Korean prosecutors have arrested Kang Jong-Hyun, the anonymous chairman and owner of the country’s largest cryptocurrency exchange, Bithumb, on charges of embezzlement and stock manipulation.

Retail FX

Interactive Brokers volumes snap three-month losing streak

Electronic brokerage firm Interactive Brokers LLC (NASDAQ:IBKR) said its trading volumes rose in January, an indication that investor confidence in the financial markets is rebounding after having been fairly mixed over the past few months.

Digital Assets

VVF invests $5 million in Everscale, a potential Layer 2 solution for Venom blockchain

“For us, this is a strategic investment aimed at the technological development of projects and teams around technologies that we focus on and actively develop. In particular, we are talking about the Venom blockchain project and its ecosystem, which is planned to be launched soon and for which Everscale is a potential Layer 2 solution.”