Effex Capital, embroiled in FXCM’s US exit, loses appeal in case against NFA

Maria Nikolova

The Seventh Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals said permitting a collateral attack on NFA’s proceedings based on Effex’s tort claims would impair the NFA’s ability to enforce its rules.

Effex Capital, the company embroiled in the exit of FXCM from the US retail FX market, has suffered a defeat at the Seventh Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals in a case alleging the National Futures Association (NFA) defamed it in its press release about proceedings against FXCM.

On August 13, 2019, the Seventh Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals issued Final Judgment affirming the District Court’s ruling in the case. Put briefly, the Court of Appeals sided with the District Court in that Effex Capital had not exhausted all administrative remedies available to it before taking NFA to Court.

Effex Capital, LLC launched an action alleging that NFA had defamed it in documents related to a settlement between the NFA and one of its members, Forex Capital Markets, LLC (FXCM).

Let’s recall that the NFA initiated an investigation into an association member, FXCM, and found that the company had engaged in several practices that violate the NFA’s rules. FXCM chose to settle with the NFA, and on February 6, 2017, the NFA released several documents related to the settlement. These documents include: (1) a complaint setting forth the NFA’s allegations against FXCM; (2) a decision by the NFA Business Conduct Committee finding that FXCM committed the violations outlined in the complaint and de‐ tailing the terms of a settlement between the NFA and FXCM; (3) a publicly accessible narrative summarizing the decision; and (4) a press release announcing the decision and directing the public to the narrative posted on the NFA’s website.

The NFA’s complaint against FXCM alleged that FXCM failed to comply with a litany of NFA rules. In particular, the NFA claimed that Effex was involved in the misconduct allegedly committed by FXCM. The resulting decision outlined the allegations in the complaint, including those involving Effex, and accepted them as true. The accompanying narrative summarized the decision, including its statements about Effex. The press release, although it did not specifically reference Effex, noted that FXCM committed numerous deceptive and abusive actions and directed the public to the narrative on the NFA’s website. Effex alleged that the NFA’s findings in the FXCM Settlement Documents are false and that their publication is defamatory.

Effex did not seek review of either the NFA’s decision or the Commission’s decision regarding FXCM. Rather, four months after the decisions were released, Effex filed this action against the NFA in the district court.

Effex sought injunctive relief, asking for an order requiring the NFA to remove the FXCM Settlement Documents from its website, to delete all references to Effex, or, alternatively, to provide Effex with a “name clearing hearing.” It further requested an order compelling the NFA to “issue a new press release stating: (a) NFA did not make any findings against Effex or Dittami; (b) Effex was not a de facto dealing desk of FXCM; (c) Effex was not controlled by FXCM; and (d) FXCM was not ordered to make any customer restitution.” Effex also asked for money damages of $10,000,000 for lost profits and to redress its constitutional injury.

The district court dismissed Effex’s Complaint. Effex timely appealed.

In affirming the District Court’s ruling, the Court of Appeals notes that the NFA’s discipline of its own members is a specific and central element of the role Congress delegated to SROs in its regulation of the commodities futures market.

If a member could challenge the NFA’s discipline and disciplinary process through a state‐tort claim, the NFA’s capacity to discipline its members- here, FXCM- for violating its rules would be impaired significantly. State courts effectively could supervise the NFA’s regulation of its members and thus impede its federally mandated role in the Commodity Exchange Act’s overall scheme. The resulting obstacle to Congress’s purposes in creating federal regulations overseeing the national commodities futures market is obvious.

Allowing suits against the NFA arising out of the NFA’s disciplinary actions would present a serious obstacle to the NFA’s ability to carry out its regulatory duties, especially where there are administrative remedies available.

Effex claims, in essence, that the NFA improperly conducted its disciplinary proceedings. It does not matter whether Effex is a member or nonmember of the NFA or a party or nonparty to the proceedings.

“Permitting a collateral attack on those proceedings based on Effex’s tort claims would impair the NFA’s ability to enforce its rules and carry out its regulatory role”, the Court says.

The CFTC has filed an amicus brief outlining its view on whether a nonparty can seek review of an NFA disciplinary procedure or otherwise seek redress before the Commission. The Commission said that although nonparties do not have a right to CFTC review of an NFA action that implicates them, the Commission does have the discretion to permit nonparties to obtain CFTC review in extraordinary circumstances. The district court was of the view that nonparties also have the right to CFTC review through intervention or by asking the CFTC to review a matter sua sponte.

The Court of Appeals says it does not believe it appropriate for it to delineate in any definitive way the administrative paths that may be open to Effex. It is not at all clear that Effex will choose to pursue the administrative remedies that may be open to it.

Read this next

Digital Assets

Himalaya Exchange customers seek release of frozen funds from DOJ

FormerFeds, a corporate defense and litigation service provider, has filed a lawsuit against the U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ) on behalf of over three and a half thousand Himalaya Exchange customers.

Digital Assets

Nubank, Circle, and Talos join forces for crypto adoption in Brazil

Nubank, the Brazilian neobank backed by Warren Buffett’s Berkshire Hathaway and Softbank Group Corp, announced new partnerships with cryptocurrency firms Circle and Talos.

Metaverse Gaming NFT

Flare onboards Ankr, Figment, Restake, and NorthStake as validators

Flare, an EVM smart contract platform known for its focus on blockchain data utility, has announced a major step in its development. The platform has onboarded leading infrastructure providers, including Ankr, Figment, Restake, and NorthStake.

Digital Assets

Sui Joins DeFi Leaders, Topping $100M in Bridged USDC

Sui, the groundbreaking Layer 1 blockchain created by the technology experts who led Meta’s Diem blockchain initiative and created the Move smart contract language, continues its explosive ascent in decentralized finance (DeFi). This week, it surpassed $100 million in bridged USDC. 

Digital Assets

Poloniex hit by UK regulator, listed as ‘unauthorised’ exchange

The UK’s Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) has added the cryptocurrency exchange Poloniex to its warning list of non-authorized companies. Poloniex, which is based in Seychelles, has experienced four hacks in the last two months and is affiliated with entrepreneur Justin Sun.

Industry News

Exclusive Markets is Proudly ISO/IEC 27001:2013 Certified by MSECB for Unparalleled Commitment to Information Security

Exclusive Markets, a leading name in the FINTECH sector, proudly announces the attainment of ISO/IEC 27001:2013 Certification by the MSECB. This esteemed certification highlights Exclusive Markets’ persistent commitment to fortifying information security within its cutting-edge trading technology. 

Digital Assets

SEC is discussing ‘technical details’ of Bitcoin EFTs ahead of approval

Discussions between the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) and asset managers seeking to list Bitcoin exchange-traded funds (ETFs) have reportedly advanced to key technical details.

Digital Assets

Versatus Labs Reaches $50 Million Valuation Following $2.3 Million Seed Funding Round

Versatus Labs, a peer-to-peer web services protocol aiming to help Web2 developers transition to Web3, has completed a $2.3 million funding round at a $50 million valuation led by key investors in the Web3 space including NGC Ventures and Republic Crypto. The latest funding round aims to help the company develop the ‘world’s first stateless roll-up’, Versatus LASR. This follows Versatus Labs’ recent pivot from Layer 1 solutions to Ethereum scaling solutions. 

Digital Assets

Binance ex-chief’s sentencing looms as court accepts his guilty plea

A U.S. district judge has accepted a guilty plea from former Binance CEO Changpeng Zhao (CZ) on charges related to anti-money laundering violations. The plea was accepted by Judge Richard Jones in the U.S. District Court for the Western District of Washington in Seattle.