FXCM’s “flash crash” narrative is merely a smokescreen, according to plaintiffs in securities fraud case

Maria Nikolova

Plaintiffs in a securities fraud case concerning the events from January 15, 2015 assert that Drew Niv misrepresented the fundamental and inherent risks of FXCM’s retail currency business.

fxcm

The proceedings in a securities fraud class action against Global Brokerage Inc (NASDAQ:GLBR), formerly known as FXCM Inc, and Drew Niv continue at the New York Southern District Court, with the plaintiffs in the case, captioned International Union of Operating Engineers Local No. 478 Pension Fund v. FXCM Inc. et al (1:15-cv-03599), filing their opposition to the defendants’ motion to dismiss on Tuesday.

The document, seen by FinanceFeeds, provides a detailed response to the rather colorful defense that FXCM’s legal representative has offered. One of the main points of this defense was that Drew Niv need not be clairvoyant, meaning that he could not have predicted the SNB decision from January 15, 2015 and its outcome. In their response to this argument, the plaintiffs note that they do not allege that Defendants should have been clairvoyant, but rather that they violated their legal duty under the federal securities laws to truthfully disclose the risks inherent in the Company’s so-called “agency” trading model.

The plaintiffs reiterate their earlier allegations that Defendants’ narrative about FXCM being the innocent victim of a “Black Swan” event is just a fiction designed to cover-up fraudulent misconduct.

Specifically, Defendants are alleged to have wrongly attributed FXCM’s losses to a once-in-a-lifetime “Black Swan event,” falsely stating that the failure of its banks to provide pricing and a lack of liquidity had caused its customers’ positions to be liquidated at dislocated prices. In fact, as testimony of FXCM witnesses and documents produced by FXCM in the CFTC proceeding have since revealed, the “flash crash” narrative was a smokescreen. As Defendant Niv himself admitted in a February 11, 2015 email, FXCM’s banks on the other side of its EUR/CHF trades – Citibank and Deutsche Bank – had “never turned FXCM off.”. This was confirmed by Janelle Lester, FXCM’s head of compliance.

The case is not about whether the SNB actions were a “surprise,” but rather about whether Defendants knowingly misstated and concealed the fundamentals of FXCM’s business and the massive risks facing the broker, the plaintiffs argue.

Rather than a “low-probability” event, the risk of loss to FXCM was both known to and discussed by the defendants, as shown by the testimony of operations manager Paresh Patel who raised the issue of increasing margins with Niv as its competitors’ customers flocked to FXCM to take advantage of its more generous (and risky) margin requirements, but Niv declined to do so. A confidential witness also said that he had issued a similar warning to Niv subordinate Brendan Callan, head of the Company’s European operations.

The plaintiffs also stress the importance of the events from February 2017, when the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) and the National Futures Association (NFA) published proceedings against FXCM and Niv. Rather than contest the allegations made in these proceedings, Defendants opted to settle them, the plaintiffs stress. FXCM and Niv have noted that “the CFTC Consent Order is a ‘no-admit no-deny’ settlement with no evidentiary value,” and that the Court should draw inferences in their favor from the fact that the CFTC did not make certain allegations.

The plaintiffs note that they rely on testimony and documents produced by Defendants to the CFTC, not the findings in the Consent Order.

That the CFTC did not allege, for example, “that FXCM’s public filings were false or misleading, or that Defendants had misled . . . investors regarding the risks associated with the agency model” is not surprising given that the CFTC’s regulatory focus is the protection of customer assets, not the protection of investors.

As FinanceFeeds has reported, the case at hand is a securities fraud class action brought on behalf of all purchasers of FXCM common stock between March 17, 2014 and January 20, 2015. During the Class Period, Plaintiff and the Class purchased FXCM securities at allegedly artificially inflated prices. When FXCM’s and Niv’s alleged misrepresentations were revealed and the information once concealed from the market was unravelled, the price of FXCM’s securities significantly declined, causing investors’ losses. The Defendants’ conduct is said to have caused an economic loss to the Plaintiff and the Class.

Read this next

Executive Moves

XS.com hires Ahmed Negm, a popular market analyst on CNBC, Sky News, Bloomberg’s Asharq

“Ahmed’s expertise and passion for understanding the intricacies of the financial markets will be invaluable as we continue to grow our client base and expand into new jurisdictions.”

Institutional FX

ATFX uses blockchain to help clients verify IBs and vice versa

ATFX said it has been working on the IB verification project for a few months.

Industry News

Research market in dire straits as SEC’s ‘no-action’ letter on MiFID II lapses in June – survey

“Of all the regulatory news that has hit the research market in the last few months, this is the one change that will fundamentally impact what fund managers can access and pay for in future.”

Executive Moves

Wombat appoints ex-abrdn Richard Charnock as UK platform turns to Europe

Launched in 2019, Wombat provides a dedicated mobile investing platform – available on both iOS and Android – offering users both range and choice.

Institutional FX

Broadridge integrates Point Focal’s pre and post-market reports

“Point Focal provides a unique lens on the market which will help add alpha to the trading process and these new insights will rapidly improve performance while mitigating execution risk and simplify trading.”

Technology

XCritical integrates with Brokeree Solutions, allowing its clients to launch copy trading 

The forex software provider – XCritical, has integrated Social Trading by Brokeree Solutions into their CRM system.

Industry News

HKEX partners with Saudi exchange for cross listings, ESG, Fintech

“The Kingdom of Saudi Arabia, and the broader Middle Eastern region, are one of the world’s most dynamic and exciting economic and innovation hubs and also home to some of the fastest growing investor groups in the world. Hong Kong and HKEX’s markets offer significant opportunities for international investors and corporates, including unrivalled connectivity to the Mainland Chinese markets through our unique Connect programmes. This agreement signals the beginning of even greater collaboration between our companies and our home markets, and we look forward to exploring many future areas of cooperation.”

Executive Moves

CMC Markets Connect relocates APAC team led by Peter Foster to Singapore

“Singapore is a vibrant city and is now undoubtedly seen as Asia’s leading financial hub. The decision to bolster the CMC Markets Connect team here will help us cement the company’s position as a leading provider of multi asset liquidity and comprehensive trading solutions across the region.”

Retail FX

Italian watchdog red flags Olympus Brokers, UnicoFX and Allfina Group

Italy’s Commissione Nazionale per le Società e la Borsa (CONSOB) has shut down new websites in an ongoing clampdown against firms it accuses of illegally promoting investment products in the country.

<