FXCM’s “flash crash” narrative is merely a smokescreen, according to plaintiffs in securities fraud case

Maria Nikolova

Plaintiffs in a securities fraud case concerning the events from January 15, 2015 assert that Drew Niv misrepresented the fundamental and inherent risks of FXCM’s retail currency business.

fxcm

The proceedings in a securities fraud class action against Global Brokerage Inc (NASDAQ:GLBR), formerly known as FXCM Inc, and Drew Niv continue at the New York Southern District Court, with the plaintiffs in the case, captioned International Union of Operating Engineers Local No. 478 Pension Fund v. FXCM Inc. et al (1:15-cv-03599), filing their opposition to the defendants’ motion to dismiss on Tuesday.

The document, seen by FinanceFeeds, provides a detailed response to the rather colorful defense that FXCM’s legal representative has offered. One of the main points of this defense was that Drew Niv need not be clairvoyant, meaning that he could not have predicted the SNB decision from January 15, 2015 and its outcome. In their response to this argument, the plaintiffs note that they do not allege that Defendants should have been clairvoyant, but rather that they violated their legal duty under the federal securities laws to truthfully disclose the risks inherent in the Company’s so-called “agency” trading model.

The plaintiffs reiterate their earlier allegations that Defendants’ narrative about FXCM being the innocent victim of a “Black Swan” event is just a fiction designed to cover-up fraudulent misconduct.

Specifically, Defendants are alleged to have wrongly attributed FXCM’s losses to a once-in-a-lifetime “Black Swan event,” falsely stating that the failure of its banks to provide pricing and a lack of liquidity had caused its customers’ positions to be liquidated at dislocated prices. In fact, as testimony of FXCM witnesses and documents produced by FXCM in the CFTC proceeding have since revealed, the “flash crash” narrative was a smokescreen. As Defendant Niv himself admitted in a February 11, 2015 email, FXCM’s banks on the other side of its EUR/CHF trades – Citibank and Deutsche Bank – had “never turned FXCM off.”. This was confirmed by Janelle Lester, FXCM’s head of compliance.

The case is not about whether the SNB actions were a “surprise,” but rather about whether Defendants knowingly misstated and concealed the fundamentals of FXCM’s business and the massive risks facing the broker, the plaintiffs argue.

Rather than a “low-probability” event, the risk of loss to FXCM was both known to and discussed by the defendants, as shown by the testimony of operations manager Paresh Patel who raised the issue of increasing margins with Niv as its competitors’ customers flocked to FXCM to take advantage of its more generous (and risky) margin requirements, but Niv declined to do so. A confidential witness also said that he had issued a similar warning to Niv subordinate Brendan Callan, head of the Company’s European operations.

The plaintiffs also stress the importance of the events from February 2017, when the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) and the National Futures Association (NFA) published proceedings against FXCM and Niv. Rather than contest the allegations made in these proceedings, Defendants opted to settle them, the plaintiffs stress. FXCM and Niv have noted that “the CFTC Consent Order is a ‘no-admit no-deny’ settlement with no evidentiary value,” and that the Court should draw inferences in their favor from the fact that the CFTC did not make certain allegations.

The plaintiffs note that they rely on testimony and documents produced by Defendants to the CFTC, not the findings in the Consent Order.

That the CFTC did not allege, for example, “that FXCM’s public filings were false or misleading, or that Defendants had misled . . . investors regarding the risks associated with the agency model” is not surprising given that the CFTC’s regulatory focus is the protection of customer assets, not the protection of investors.

As FinanceFeeds has reported, the case at hand is a securities fraud class action brought on behalf of all purchasers of FXCM common stock between March 17, 2014 and January 20, 2015. During the Class Period, Plaintiff and the Class purchased FXCM securities at allegedly artificially inflated prices. When FXCM’s and Niv’s alleged misrepresentations were revealed and the information once concealed from the market was unravelled, the price of FXCM’s securities significantly declined, causing investors’ losses. The Defendants’ conduct is said to have caused an economic loss to the Plaintiff and the Class.

Read this next

Digital Assets

US court rules crypto trades as securities in Coinbase case

A US court ruled that trading crypto assets on platforms like Coinbase constitutes securities transactions.

Market News

Weekly Data: Oil and Gold: Brief Review before the NFP

This preview of weekly data looks at USOIL and XAUUSD where economic data coming up later this week are the main market drivers for the near short-term outlook.

Institutional FX

FXSpotStream reports lower volumes for February 2024

FXSpotStream’s trading venue, the aggregator service of LiquidityMatch LLC, reported its operational metrics for February 2024, which moved lower on a monthly basis.

Fundamental Analysis

Global FX Market Summary: EUR, USD, Gold March 4th,2024

US Dollar Weakness: The US Dollar (USD) is currently struggling to gain strength due to a combination of factors.

Technical Analysis

Bitcoin Technical Analysis Report 4 March, 2024

Bitcoin cryptocurrency can be expected to rise further toward the next resistance level 69000.00 (former multiyear high from January)

Opinion

Finding Opportunity in Challenge: Why New Regulations Offer a Chance For Business to Get on Top of Data Management

The combination of CESOP, PSD3 and the PSR, has put businesses under new pressures. In this engaging article, André Casterman, Senior Advisor at Intix provides invaluable guidance on how companies can stay ahead of the curve.

Institutional FX

Finalto launches Prime of Prime offering on LSEG’s FX Matching venue

“By combining our expertise in Prime of Prime services with LSEG’s robust trading platform, we aim to empower clients with the tools and resources needed to navigate the FX market with confidence.”

Digital Assets

Tether’s USDT stablecoin nears 100 billion in circulating supply

USDT, the world’s largest stablecoin, has reached close to 100 billion in circulating supply, currently sitting at around 99.5 billion. Its market capitalization, which reached over $100 billion at one point, is calculated by multiplying the supply by the price.

Market News

5 Hot Stocks For March 2024

Entering March 2024 marks the beginning of the final stretch of the first quarter of the year, seemingly passing swiftly amidst market anticipation and global economic factors.

<