After last week's explosive argument about trade execution, what do retail brokers think? - FinanceFeeds

After last week’s explosive argument about trade execution, what do retail brokers think?

Andrew Saks

RTS28 is a lot of paper and hot air….


Last week, FinanceFeeds reported in detail with regard to an unprecedented and explosive argument which erupted in the public domain between some of the institutional FX industry’s most renowned and respected figures.

Each had an important issue to bring forward with regard to trade execution, and how the European trade execution reporting requirement RTS28 fits into the FX industry’s remit, along with whether it is a futile regulation or a valuable one.

Clearly, trade execution among prime of prime brokerages is a contentious point, and following the diatribe involving several senior executives, FinanceFeeds discussed these issues in detail with each company involved in order to provide a full insight into what matters with regard to trade execution.

This has always been a sore point, as brokerages, liquidity providers and even banks are not required to disclose the method by which they executed their trades, they simply have to be able to demonstrate that they act according to the trader or end user’s interests under ‘best execution’ guidelines, which are vague a best, and being challenged by senior industry executives to the extent that regulators are even considering dropping such guidelines.

Since the implementation of MiFID II across the European Union, in which infrastructure requirements were standardized by the European regulatory authority ESMA, some complex procedures were put in place, namely RTS27 and RTS28, which FinanceFeeds has discussed at length with specialists in this procedure.

The furious tirade was ignited by Yuriy Maevskiy, an FX project manager who has spent the last ten years within Cyprus-based brokerages.

Mr Maevskiy’s comment sparked an unprecedented battle among some of the leaders of the FX industry, from IS Prime, Advanced Markets & Fortex, and INVAST Global, who interacted vigorously with each other.

Responding to a LinkedIn publication by Eduardo Delgado, Managing Partner of Fintexify, in which Mr Delgado responded to an RTS report by the regulators by observing “It shows the own broker/LP as the only trading venue where 100% of the flow is executed: This means that the FX broker/LP is internalizing all the orders’ flow it’s receiving, taking the counterpart to the trades are managing the risk internally. It shows different brokers or liquidity provider and an unknown company as execution venues where x% of the flow is executed: This most probably means that the broker is sending the flow they want to STP to the LPs, and the flow they want to b-book to the unknown company”, Mr Maevskiy put forward his viewpoint.

Once our esteemed professionals had argued this out, the full extent of which can be viewed here, it was considered of value to look at this from a retail brokerage perspective.

Indeed, retail FX brokers are the direct audience and customer base of prime of prime brokerages, and they are also subject to the same rulings under RTS28. The question is, is RTS28 of any value, or is it an impedance which has been implemented by regulators who do not understand trade execution properly (I think it’s certainly the latter – Ed).

FinanceFeeds spoke today to Natalia Zakharova, Business Development Manager at FXOpen, a brokerage with licenses in all of the regions in which FX brokerages are populous.

Ms Zakharova explained to FinanceFeeds “The only thing that counts is how the trade has been filled.”

“When retail clients trade with us they legally face us as a counterparty and it is our job as a broker to protect their interests and choose the liquidity providers and prime brokers” continued Ms Zakharova.

“Should there be some issues with execution, we are the ones at risk. Pointing the finger at some counterparty down the line might be rightfully correct, but ultimately pointless from then reputational standpoint. Therefore, as long as prime of prime brokerages act in good faith and their business practices are fair, it doesn’t really matter with whom the trade was executed” concluded Ms Zakharova.

This echoes the current rationale among many OTC derivatives firms when choosing which Tier 1 counterparty to face. XTX Markets, along with some of its non-bank market making competitors now litter the top 10 Tier 1 FX dealers by market share like a vagrant on a beach.

This is clearly because the OTC derivatives industry understands well that the Tier 1 banks do not prioritise FX brokers, even though Tier 1 FX dealing is the core business activity of most American and British investment banks adorning the water’s edge here at London’s Canary Wharf.

Instead of rejecting fills, operating a cherry-picking last-look execution policy, and castigating OTC derivatives firms as a potential default risk by applying huge capital adequacy requirements alongside the extremely risk averse execution policies, non-bank market makers understand the OTC industry well and give the brokers what they want, that being quick fills, no last look and no slippage.

In effect, no messing about which banks call normal practice, yet FX brokers would be up before a judge for participating in.

So yes, RTS28 is a lot of paper and hot air.

Read this next

Industry News

Citadel Securities dominates European FX, and is one of the most profitable businesses in the world

Non bank market makers are absolutely dominating the growth of FX order flow execution. Citadel Securities is now the largest internalizer in Europe by market share, a battle it is winning against Tier 1 banks alongside global leader XTX Markets. It is good to see the OTC sector holding its own.

Industry News

Playtech confirms it has been approached over the sale of Finalto

Finalto was described by the company as Playtech’s outstanding performer in H1 2020

Industry News

More greenwash: CME bends to the eco agenda by launching global emissions offset contract. Yawn….

CME Group has capitulated to the green agenda. Today, the company puts out tedious and jargonistic soundbites, saying that its new instruments will reduce emissions. Who will be interested and who will fall asleep?

Industry News

CQG Releases New PanXchange Widget on CQG Desktop for OTC and listed products

Seamlessly taking positions and managing risk across listed and OTC markets has to be the way forward for many brokers.

Industry News

The EU sets out its position

TP ICAP will not be allowed to temporarily service all of its EU customers from London as it had previously believed it could

Industry News

2021 is the year of the non-bank market maker in FX: Optiver leads the way on FXall

Clearly, the banks are being shown a clean pair of heels by the most advanced companies in the FX business. Let’s hope that this paves a new way forward for OTC counterparty relationships and that execution and settlement is now the channel for innovation.

Industry News

CMC Markets selects AWS to improve speed of product delivery

Instead of focusing on the undifferentiated heavy lifting of managing servers, by using AWS CMC Markets has freed up valuable development hours

Industry News

OANDA plays an ace against Australian OTC trading restrictions, goes for pro traders with 1:100 leverage

OANDA Corporation’s Australian division has launched an account with higher leverage for professional traders. During the regulatory reforms by ASIC, many Australian brokers began an attempt to lobby the regulator to accept different leverage rates for different levels of trader.

Industry News

Are US equity markets in a bubble?

88.88 % of all S&P 500 stocks are trading above their 200-day moving average