New rules for Scottish Limited Partnerships, seen to counter binary options fraud, face criticism - FinanceFeeds

New rules for Scottish Limited Partnerships, seen to counter binary options fraud, face criticism

Maria Nikolova

The House of Lords and lawyers find errors and loopholes in the new rules that require enhanced transparency of Scottish Limited Partnerships, often used as corporate front for fraudulent activities, including binary options scams.

In June this year, FinanceFeeds reported of new rules demanding increased transparency in reporting by Scottish Limited Partnerships (SLPs). Scottish Partnerships (Register of People with Significant Control) Regulations 2017 came into force on June 26, 2017 with the aim to bring SLPs in line with others in the UK, as they now have to provide extra information about the persons with significant control (PSC), that is, they have to disclose the identity of their beneficial owners.

The move has been long awaited by many, as SLPs are often used as fronts for illegal activities, including binary options scams.

The new rules, however, have faced criticism, as exhibited by a recent report by the House of Lords’ Secondary Legislation Scrutiny Committee.

The Committee notes the confusion stemming from the requirements concerning PSC.

“The “person with significant control” test is set as someone with the right to receive 25% of the assets on winding up. In many partnership agreements it is not clear in advance what percentage of assets will be received by an individual partner. Many partnerships provide for the priority repayment of subscribed capital, often to the original partners, with the remaining surplus distributed in different proportions, sometimes prioritising newer younger partners. The percentage of the total assets received by each partner will therefore depend not only on the individual percentages but also on the relative balance between subscribed and retained capital”, the report says.

The report also stresses that such requirements are associated with a bureaucratic process and certain costs, and that there has been “no assessment of the effectiveness and value for money of the bureaucratic process proposed, particularly as compliance costs are inevitably passed on to the customer”.

Another point made in the report is that the regulations were laid on June 23, 2017, and brought into force on June 26, 2017, thus breaching the convention that 21 days are normally allowed between the laying of an instrument and its coming into force.

The new Scottish regulations have attracted scrutiny from law firms too, with a notable example being Shepherd and Wedderburn LLP. According to Peter Alderdice and Roderick MacLeod of Shepherd and Wedderburn LLP the new rules contain a number of drafting flaws or errors that need to be clarified or amended.

Let’s mention one of them – it concerns the Enforcement procedure. Paragraph 16(1)(a) of Schedule 2 to the Scottish Regulations states that it is an offence for any Person with Significant Control (PSC) to fail to comply with their duty to update PSC information supplied about them. However, one of the duties in the provision refers to a regulation containing no relevant duties, rather than to Regulation 13 which contains corresponding duties obliging a PSC to provide relevant information to the SLP where it has not been requested by the SLP. PSCs are still required to comply with Regulation 13 and provide the relevant PSC information, but failure to comply with this duty does not appear to attract sanction.

Read this next

Industry News

John McAfee indicted on crypto fraud charges

This is only the first case brought by the CFTC for a manipulative scheme involving digital assets

Industry News

ASIC announces regulatory costs ahead of CFD trading restrictions

The Australian regulator “is acutely aware of the challenges facing many businesses due to COVID-19”, but made no reference to the challenges FX and CFD brokers will face amid the leverage restrictions.

Industry News

Top lawyers say 2021 will be record year for AML penalties

Federal regulators have imposed more than $200 million in penalties on corporations, just in the last two months.

Industry News

Swedish crypto conman pleads guilty to $16 million scam

Karlsson was extradited from Thailand and is facing a maximum sentence of 20 years for the wire fraud and securities fraud charges and another 20 years for the money laundering charge.

Industry News

ESG premium on corporate bonds of +5bps in Europe

The top issuers of ESG bonds and loans in 2020 were France, Germany, and Luxembourg, compared to France, the UK, and Spain in 2019.

Technology

Finastra gains access to NICE Actimize AML and fraud solution

The AI-powered platform provides AML and fraud solutions, with real-time behavioral analytics and machine learning capabilities.

Industry News

A new dawn in stock trading is here. Your brokerage should embrace it!

London looks set to capitalize on the latest global equities trend of Spacs – This could well be the new trend for electronic trading firms. We investigate how.

Industry News

SEC launches Climate and ESG Task Force

The task force will develop initiatives to identify ESG-related misconduct and use data analysis to mine and assess information across registrants, to identify potential violations.

Industry News

Mobile trading takes center stage: Is your brokerage doing what it takes?

Mobile trading has grown in popularity in recent years to the point it became indispensable for the trading industry. The lifestyle changes and mass retail adoption amid the COVID-19 pandemic made sure there is no going back.