Former MtGox clients object to Mark Karpeles’ arguments in US case

Maria Nikolova

The plaintiffs in a case against the ex-CEO of the ill-fated Bitcoin exchange say he is not protected from prosecution under the fiduciary shield doctrine.

The arguments of Mark Karpeles, former head of notorious Bitcoin exchange MtGox, have resulted in a stark response from former clients of the Exchange.

On Tuesday, October 16th, Gregory Greene and Anthony Motto, former customers of MtGox, filed their response to Karpeles’ motion to dismiss with the Illinois Northern District Court.

One of the central points of argument is the so-called fiduciary shield doctrine. This doctrine prevents courts from asserting jurisdiction over a person on the basis of acts taken by that person not on his own behalf, but on behalf of his employer.

Karpeles contends that the fiduciary shield doctrine prohibits the exercise of jurisdiction over him related to actions taken as MtGox’s CEO. He claims that a corporation must be his alter ego so that he may lose the protections of the fiduciary shield.

But the plaintiffs say it is not so. While a finding that a defendant is the alter ego of a subject entity would of course negate any protections afforded by the fiduciary shield doctrine, the doctrine itself is far narrower.

“The fiduciary shield doctrine does not protect a defendant who has decision-making authority and a financial stake in the company that directed him or her to a jurisdiction,” the plaintiffs argue.

According to them, Karpeles controlled all aspects of MtGox’s business. Karpeles acknowledges that he was the sole shareholder of the entity that held 88% of MtGox’s equity. Thus, the fiduciary shield doctrine does not preclude jurisdiction over Karpeles, the plaintiffs say.

Let’s recall that Mark Karpeles is being sued in Illinois by US clients of MtGox who accuse him of:

  • intentionally, with gross recklessness, or negligently stealing plaintiffs’ bitcoins and fiat currency;
  • negligence, alleging that Karpeles owed the plaintiffs a duty of reasonable care to prevent improper access and misuse of the plaintiffs’ bitcoins and fiat currency and to allow authorized users complete access to the same and breached those duties;
  • consumer fraud – Karpeles represented that he would protect MtGox clients’ bitcoins and fiat currency and allow them to buy, sell, trade, and withdraw those funds, while siphoning, or allowing others to siphon, funds from Mt. Gox customers’ accounts.

The plaintiffs also allege that Karpeles concealed that Mizuho Bank was no longer providing international withdrawal services, that thousands of bitcoins had been lost or stolen, and that he was shutting down the exchange and filing for bankruptcy.

The case, captioned Greene v. MtGox Inc. et al (1:14-cv-01437), continues at the Illinois Northern District Court.

Read this next

Digital Assets

Swarm Markets deploys DEX on the Polygon Network

A blockchain bridge within the platform UI will help investors move assets seamlessly from Ethereum to Polygon to take advantage of the low-fee pools.

Industry News

Peel Hunt renews with ION’s Fidessa Trading Platform as broker enters new growth phase

Peel Hunt is an increasingly important provider of trade execution services to UK retail platforms and brokers. We are delighted that Peel Hunt has chosen the Fidessa Trading Platform to grow its business further.”

Digital Assets brings crypto trading platform to Middle East and North Africa

“The demand economics for digital assets in the Mena region is extremely promising. The region is currently undergoing a tech-powered sociocultural evolution, which has consequently increased the appetite for digital assets.”

Industry News

Nasdaq fines SpeedRoute $450,000 for numerous erroneous orders

“As a gatekeeper providing access to our market for its clients, SpeedRoute plays a critical role in protecting investors and market integrity”

Digital Assets

Bybit launches P2P transactions for financial inclusion while disregarding regulators

“For the underbanked and retail investors everywhere, this fiat currency payment solution provides them with seamless access to invest in cryptocurrencies, freeing investors from the burdens of intransparent fees, layers of intermediaries, delays and high barriers to entry.”

Retail FX

eToro launches stocks and ETFs in the United States as crypto investors diversify

“Of the 2,000 U.S. crypto investors surveyed, 35% have been investing for less than a year, 50% have been investing for one to three years, and 56% indicated that investing in crypto made them more likely to consider investing in stocks in the future”.

Digital Assets

Is Ripple’s XRP a security and does the SEC believe in its own case theory?

Conspiracy theories aside, it remains worthy of note that the SEC, which has sought injunctive relief many times, has forgotten (?) to do the same in the SEC v. Ripple case. Why?

Digital Assets

Ripple lawsuit: “Today’s XRP isn’t 2013’s token”: John Deaton renews Amicus Curiae argument

Indeed, the case for utility has just initiated a new chapter as XRP moves into the wider blockchain universe to be used according to the wishes of its holders. 

Digital Assets

UK government to bring crypto adverts into FCA’s oversight

The UK Government plans to toughen up rules on crypto advertising that could be considered misleading. The Exchequer is proposing to bring the promotion of crypto-assets into the scope of the FCA’s existing oversight, rather than creating a new framework specifically for these products.